Palin's book on top at amazon
in [Golf]
|
From: Frank Ketchum on 20 Nov 2009 15:10 "William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in message news:clark-123909.14010520112009(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > > Not when some idiot is holding it up as the only impartial and accurate > news source, it isn't. You don't even comprehend what he said but he is the idiot. Got it.
From: William Clark on 20 Nov 2009 15:52 In article <zFCNm.19618$We2.12125(a)newsfe09.iad>, "Frank Ketchum" <nospam(a)thanksanyway.com> wrote: > "William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in message > news:clark-123909.14010520112009(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > > > > Not when some idiot is holding it up as the only impartial and accurate > > news source, it isn't. > > You don't even comprehend what he said but he is the idiot. Got it. You don't even know whose quote I am referring to, but you are an expert. Got it.
From: William Clark on 20 Nov 2009 15:55 In article <4b06e88b$0$5342$bbae4d71(a)news.suddenlink.net>, "Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> wrote: > "William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in message > news:clark-123909.14010520112009(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > > In article <FaANm.17212$gd1.6000(a)newsfe05.iad>, > > "Frank Ketchum" <nospam(a)thanksanyway.com> wrote: > > > >> "William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in message > >> news:clark-93CB2D.09012920112009(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > >> > > >> > Indeed, here's an indication of how smart and accurate Fox News is: > >> > > >> > http://tiny.cc/FqC5z > >> > > >> > http://tiny.cc/jtCJ5 > >> > > >> > Clearly the most reliable and unbiased news source around. Right. > >> > >> That's the best you can do to attack Fox? Pretty laughable. > > > > Not when some idiot is holding it up as the only impartial and accurate > > news source, it isn't. > > You obviously misread his original post. Here it is again > > ** > No one ever pretends? Pretty pretentious of you to claim to speak for > everyone. IMHO FOX News has a strong conservative bias, but they are > more honest than any of the other major networks, IMHO. Unlike say NBC > and MSNBC, they don't make up news to comment on. > ** > > Last time I checked, "strong conservative bias," doesn't mean impartial. It was the "more honest" that I was talking about - "they don't make news up to comment on". Please - fake footage purporting to show big crowds ata Palin book signing, that is actually from a year ago. That might be excused as a slip is it was not their track record - witness the DC Tea Party rally, where Fox had to blow up the numbers by using a two year old picture of a totally different gathering on the Mall. "More honest" - give me strength.
From: Dinosaur_Sr on 20 Nov 2009 16:27 On Nov 20, 1:05 pm, William Clark <cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio- state.edu> wrote: > In article > <0ea27d18-f4dd-4524-acc0-bfb0afd22...(a)j24g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>, > > Dinosaur_Sr <frostback2...(a)att.net> wrote: > > On Nov 20, 9:24 am, William Clark <cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio- > > state.edu> wrote: > > > > Did Gregory lie about the T shirt? I don't think so: > > > Nope. The lie was that it had anything to do with tea parties. > > You missed the point - people who hold up signs saying "End Socailism > (sic)" tend to wear t shirts like that. McVeigh did, and we know where > he stood on the political spectrum. Or do they all have Che Guevara ones? > > But I am glad to see that you no longer challenge the accuracy of > Gregory's comment about McVeigh t shirt. That is progress. > > > > > > Actually it is hard to fathom why people would line up for 24 hours to > > > have a grabage book signed by her. But then, they line up for Paris > > > Hilton and Mylie Cyrus, too, so perhaps it shouldn't be a surprise. > > > Or Barack Obama. Too bad no one bought your book! > > Oh, but they did. At full price, too. Really? Did you sell as many copies as Palin's book sold before Palin's book came out?
From: Frank Ketchum on 20 Nov 2009 19:37
"William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in message news:clark-E0F3E1.15521920112009(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > In article <zFCNm.19618$We2.12125(a)newsfe09.iad>, > "Frank Ketchum" <nospam(a)thanksanyway.com> wrote: > >> "William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in message >> news:clark-123909.14010520112009(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... >> > >> > Not when some idiot is holding it up as the only impartial and accurate >> > news source, it isn't. >> >> You don't even comprehend what he said but he is the idiot. Got it. > > You don't even know whose quote I am referring to, but you are an > expert. Got it. I am no expert. I can read what you posted. That is all it takes to discredit you usually. |