From: Frank Ketchum on

"Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> wrote in message
news:hpkp8f$7g0$2(a)speranza.aioe.org...
>>
>> At what point to you just say you are done answering questions about this
>> and just play golf. Those who don't like it can worship someone else.
>
> Probably the day you stop taking sponsor money.


Bullshit. Nike wants this to get put to rest as badly as Tiger does.


From: bknight on
On Thu, 8 Apr 2010 11:28:49 -0400, "Frank Ketchum"
<nospam(a)thanksanyway.fu> wrote:

>
>"Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> wrote in message
>news:hpkp8f$7g0$2(a)speranza.aioe.org...
>>>
>>> At what point to you just say you are done answering questions about this
>>> and just play golf. Those who don't like it can worship someone else.
>>
>> Probably the day you stop taking sponsor money.
>
>
>Bullshit. Nike wants this to get put to rest as badly as Tiger does.
>
I would've thought so until this latest Nike ad. Bad judgment on
their part IMO.
___,
\o
|
/ \
.
�Someone likes every shot�
bk
From: Moderate on

"Frank Ketchum" <nospam(a)thanksanyway.fu> wrote in message
news:5wmvn.62045$y13.23386(a)newsfe12.iad...
>
> "Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> wrote in message
> news:hpkp8f$7g0$2(a)speranza.aioe.org...
>>>
>>> At what point to you just say you are done answering questions about
>>> this and just play golf. Those who don't like it can worship someone
>>> else.
>>
>> Probably the day you stop taking sponsor money.
>
>
> Bullshit. Nike wants this to get put to rest as badly as Tiger does.

Ignoring it isn't going to put it to rest. If Tiger did not have a sponsor
he could ignore it.