From: bknight on
On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 13:30:59 -0600, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com>
wrote:

>
>"Jack Hollis" <xsleeper(a)aol.com> wrote in message
>news:s706n55a73pn8c3ef3qtqm8tgtgjg4svet(a)4ax.com...
>> On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:52:17 -0600, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>"Jack Hollis" <xsleeper(a)aol.com> wrote in message
>>>news:9264n5l6besm20bkqla1b1fgmeqcglhgm9(a)4ax.com...
>>>> On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 20:02:37 -0600, bknight(a)conramp.net wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>You know Jack, I might be willing to discuss this with Mike, or
>>>>>Ketchum, or another conservative, but you, and a couple of others here
>>>>>are so inane with the ultra-right messages that I won't waste my time.
>>>>>Of all the posts that you've delivered here for instance the one about
>>>>>Palin possibly being elected president renders you certifiably insane.
>>>>>
>>>>>BK
>>>>
>>>> Right now, the polls show that she's the leading contender for the
>>>> Republican nomination. I'd gladly vote for her over Obama.
>>>
>>>They would be complete fools to run her again.
>>
>> It's not up to the Republican Party. It's up to the Republican
>> primary voters. She has two years to put her run together. I
>> wouldn't bet against her.
>
>If they want four more years of Obamunism they simply have to nominate her.
>She gets the nod and I leave the Republican party for good.

You said that you liked that she scares liberals, but she obviously
scares you too Mike. :-)

BK
>
From: William Clark on
In article <l546n55gtq33prlgih128a5jtbhg86781n(a)4ax.com>,
bknight(a)conramp.net wrote:

> On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 13:30:59 -0600, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com>
> wrote:
>
> >
> >"Jack Hollis" <xsleeper(a)aol.com> wrote in message
> >news:s706n55a73pn8c3ef3qtqm8tgtgjg4svet(a)4ax.com...
> >> On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:52:17 -0600, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>>"Jack Hollis" <xsleeper(a)aol.com> wrote in message
> >>>news:9264n5l6besm20bkqla1b1fgmeqcglhgm9(a)4ax.com...
> >>>> On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 20:02:37 -0600, bknight(a)conramp.net wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>>You know Jack, I might be willing to discuss this with Mike, or
> >>>>>Ketchum, or another conservative, but you, and a couple of others here
> >>>>>are so inane with the ultra-right messages that I won't waste my time.
> >>>>>Of all the posts that you've delivered here for instance the one about
> >>>>>Palin possibly being elected president renders you certifiably insane.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>BK
> >>>>
> >>>> Right now, the polls show that she's the leading contender for the
> >>>> Republican nomination. I'd gladly vote for her over Obama.
> >>>
> >>>They would be complete fools to run her again.
> >>
> >> It's not up to the Republican Party. It's up to the Republican
> >> primary voters. She has two years to put her run together. I
> >> wouldn't bet against her.
> >
> >If they want four more years of Obamunism they simply have to nominate her.
> >She gets the nod and I leave the Republican party for good.
>
> You said that you liked that she scares liberals, but she obviously
> scares you too Mike. :-)
>
> BK
> >

I think she scares liberals in the sense of wondering how anyone quite
so dim and uneducated could ever have got so close to the WH, but she
provides enormous comfort, too, with the thought of her being in
contention to be on another GoP ticket. It would be suicide for the
Republicans.
From: BAR on
In article <clark-560843.15533410022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-
state.edu>, clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu says...
>
> In article <l546n55gtq33prlgih128a5jtbhg86781n(a)4ax.com>,
> bknight(a)conramp.net wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 13:30:59 -0600, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >"Jack Hollis" <xsleeper(a)aol.com> wrote in message
> > >news:s706n55a73pn8c3ef3qtqm8tgtgjg4svet(a)4ax.com...
> > >> On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:52:17 -0600, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>>"Jack Hollis" <xsleeper(a)aol.com> wrote in message
> > >>>news:9264n5l6besm20bkqla1b1fgmeqcglhgm9(a)4ax.com...
> > >>>> On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 20:02:37 -0600, bknight(a)conramp.net wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>>You know Jack, I might be willing to discuss this with Mike, or
> > >>>>>Ketchum, or another conservative, but you, and a couple of others here
> > >>>>>are so inane with the ultra-right messages that I won't waste my time.
> > >>>>>Of all the posts that you've delivered here for instance the one about
> > >>>>>Palin possibly being elected president renders you certifiably insane.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>BK
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Right now, the polls show that she's the leading contender for the
> > >>>> Republican nomination. I'd gladly vote for her over Obama.
> > >>>
> > >>>They would be complete fools to run her again.
> > >>
> > >> It's not up to the Republican Party. It's up to the Republican
> > >> primary voters. She has two years to put her run together. I
> > >> wouldn't bet against her.
> > >
> > >If they want four more years of Obamunism they simply have to nominate her.
> > >She gets the nod and I leave the Republican party for good.
> >
> > You said that you liked that she scares liberals, but she obviously
> > scares you too Mike. :-)
> >
> > BK
> > >
>
> I think she scares liberals in the sense of wondering how anyone quite
> so dim and uneducated could ever have got so close to the WH, but she
> provides enormous comfort, too, with the thought of her being in
> contention to be on another GoP ticket. It would be suicide for the
> Republicans.

I heard the other day that there are man Republicans who will throw
themselves in front of a bullet in order to ensure that Joe "JOBS" Biden
doesn't ascend to the presidency by other than electoral methods.


From: MNMikeW on

<bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message
news:l546n55gtq33prlgih128a5jtbhg86781n(a)4ax.com...
> On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 13:30:59 -0600, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Jack Hollis" <xsleeper(a)aol.com> wrote in message
>>news:s706n55a73pn8c3ef3qtqm8tgtgjg4svet(a)4ax.com...
>>> On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:52:17 -0600, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>"Jack Hollis" <xsleeper(a)aol.com> wrote in message
>>>>news:9264n5l6besm20bkqla1b1fgmeqcglhgm9(a)4ax.com...
>>>>> On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 20:02:37 -0600, bknight(a)conramp.net wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>You know Jack, I might be willing to discuss this with Mike, or
>>>>>>Ketchum, or another conservative, but you, and a couple of others here
>>>>>>are so inane with the ultra-right messages that I won't waste my time.
>>>>>>Of all the posts that you've delivered here for instance the one about
>>>>>>Palin possibly being elected president renders you certifiably insane.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>BK
>>>>>
>>>>> Right now, the polls show that she's the leading contender for the
>>>>> Republican nomination. I'd gladly vote for her over Obama.
>>>>
>>>>They would be complete fools to run her again.
>>>
>>> It's not up to the Republican Party. It's up to the Republican
>>> primary voters. She has two years to put her run together. I
>>> wouldn't bet against her.
>>
>>If they want four more years of Obamunism they simply have to nominate
>>her.
>>She gets the nod and I leave the Republican party for good.
>
> You said that you liked that she scares liberals, but she obviously
> scares you too Mike. :-)
>
She gives me hives.


From: dene on

"MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote in message
news:7tgqo7Fv96U1(a)mid.individual.net...
>

> >>> It's not up to the Republican Party. It's up to the Republican
> >>> primary voters. She has two years to put her run together. I
> >>> wouldn't bet against her.
> >>
> >>If they want four more years of Obamunism they simply have to nominate
> >>her.
> >>She gets the nod and I leave the Republican party for good.
> >
> > You said that you liked that she scares liberals, but she obviously
> > scares you too Mike. :-)
> >
> She gives me hives.

She gives me a tingly feeling....

-Greg