Say goodbye to the internet as we know it
in [Golf]
|
From: Don Kirkman on 12 Aug 2010 13:43 On Thu, 12 Aug 2010 07:32:31 -0400, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: >In article <r63766h17bpiobt8qd6h75ct4e7tqkp7hm(a)4ax.com>, donsno2 >@charter.net says... >> >> On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 20:56:16 -0400, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: [. . .] >> >Balancing the budget is just a matter of accounting. Any competent >> >accountant can "balance" a budget. >> Er, it sort of depends on whether you're balancing a paper budget or >> a real expenditure plan that has to be implemented. >The federal budge is a paper budget. ^"t" ". . . a real expenditure plan that has to be implemented." When I was a financial manager my staff could balance budgets, but they had no control over revenues and expenditures--that authority lay elsewhere. -- Don Kirkman donsno2(a)charter.net
From: BAR on 12 Aug 2010 19:05 In article <492866ps9n7ggd1ccaoog9cnvilv716ctd(a)4ax.com>, bknight(a)conramp.net says... > > On Thu, 12 Aug 2010 09:27:23 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> > wrote: > > > > >"William Clark" <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote > >> So you do admit that Dubya was not competent. Good, after all this time. > > > >Dems must not be either as we have no budget this year. > > > > Unfortunate, but true. The incompetence of Dems, I agree and so does a majority of the US.
From: Carbon on 12 Aug 2010 19:51 On Thu, 12 Aug 2010 19:03:56 -0400, BAR wrote: > In article <32v766pk8uge2vum684fpaoqvkvt99ttek(a)4ax.com>, > bknight(a)conramp.net says... >> On Thu, 12 Aug 2010 07:34:53 -0400, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: >>> In article <e3m6661pmda23rfbji7i5p72lk1ggrekig(a)4ax.com>, >>> bknight(a)conramp.net says... >>> >>>> Fool. I repeat, show where I approve of Clinton's dalliance with >>>> Monica. You just ignore common sense, and blather on. >>> >>> Do you approve of bosses screwing, sexually, the hired help. >> >> The two replies that I rendered above answered that question, but >> only a fool would miss them. > > You did not answer the question directly. You used your typical MO and > alluded to an answer. Bert, that's YOUR typical M.O.
From: Howard Brazee on 12 Aug 2010 20:09 On 12 Aug 2010 22:25:32 GMT, Carbon <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote: >> I've stated several times Bush spent like a drunken liberal. > >He was in fact way worse than any drunken liberal I know. In fact, the >supply-side fantasists in the Republican party have all blown money like >it was going out of style every time they got the chance, and often in >conjunction with tax cuts. There seems to be a crowd of Republican economic advisors who are telling us now that the Republican policies have been disasters. They don't have anything good to say about Democratic economic policies, particularly Keynesian economics. But they *expected* better from the Republicans. -- "In no part of the constitution is more wisdom to be found, than in the clause which confides the question of war or peace to the legislature, and not to the executive department." - James Madison
From: Howard Brazee on 12 Aug 2010 20:15
On 12 Aug 2010 14:37:08 GMT, Carbon <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote: >Well immoderate, why don't you spell it out for everyone? If you've >forgotten, the argument was that Clinton was an effective President even >though he tried to screw everything that moved and then lied about it. >You see, among the sane his behavior was seen as douchey but not nearly >as bad as misleading the country into a war that so far has cost >hundreds of billions of dollars and thousands of lives. Or his "let's >cut taxes and print more money" economic policies. Or their endless >bungling of their handling of detainees. Et cetera. He wasn't called an "Ultra-Liberal", the way Obama is. I keep wondering how our country would be different if we had elected a run-of-the-mill liberal instead of electing Obama. -- "In no part of the constitution is more wisdom to be found, than in the clause which confides the question of war or peace to the legislature, and not to the executive department." - James Madison |