Say goodbye to the internet as we know it
in [Golf]
|
From: BAR on 13 Aug 2010 17:27 In article <clark-74DC08.14092013082010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio- state.edu>, clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu says... > > In article <i43f8d$k6c$1(a)speranza.aioe.org>, > "Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> wrote: > > > "William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in message > > news:clark-C68C0C.07522913082010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > > > In article > > > <1427564051303355565.467835nospam-nomail.com(a)news.suddenlink.net>, > > > Moderate <nospam(a)nomail.com> wrote: > > >> > > >> Newt got canned by Republicans. Nobody is defending his actions. You on > > >> the other hand continue the apology tour. Case closed. > > > > > > No, Newt is posing himself as the darling of the right, and is being > > > received as such. The hypocrisy tour goes on. Case wide open. > > > > So Newt getting canned means nothing? Nice double standard. > > > > Now you grab at straws and come up empty. > > So Newt is not going around trying to drum up suppport for a > Presidential run? Or being welcomed by you loons at all the Tea Party > rallies? > > You need to keep your eyes open more. Newt is toxic and will never be the GOP nominee.
From: BAR on 13 Aug 2010 17:34 In article <G9ednTiNHqLh7_jRnZ2dnUVZ_sOdnZ2d(a)supernews.com>, x(a)y.z says... > > R&B wrote: > > For those who have dozed through the "net neutrality" debate, here's > > the result. > > > > You're about to start paying more for the internet. And the internet > > you get will be a tiered system, like cable television, where you pay > > extra to access everything. > > > > No longer will you just be able to surf the 'net and go to any website > > you want. The internet service providers (and telecoms) will be able > > to "slow the faucet" to certain sites that don't pay a premium fee to > > be served up with everything else. And some sites will just be > > restricted altogether, unless you buy the "premium package" from your > > ISP to be able to access them. > > > > Oh, and if your company has its own website, that website may or may > > not be as accessible to just anyone as it's been up to now if your > > company doesn't pay a fee to Google or Verizon (or whoever else gets a > > piece of this action). > > > > Your tax dollars at work. > > > > This is what happens when a citizenry sleeps through a critically > > important matter -- a matter some are arguing is the First Amendment > > issue of the 21st century. > > > > http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/05/technology/05secret.html?_r=2&hp > > > > It's almost here. > > > > And you can thank the corporatists in Congress -- both Republicans and > > Democrats -- for siding with the telecoms on this. > > > > Douchebags. > > > > Randy > > http://www.pervices.com/docs/throttling_tech_brief.pdf Where there is a will there is a way. Nice method for tunneling.
From: BAR on 13 Aug 2010 17:38 In article <clark-BD5499.14112213082010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio- state.edu>, clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu says... > > In article <MPG.26cefcee8b68156398a1f3(a)news.giganews.com>, > BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: > > > In article <clark-C68C0C.07522913082010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio- > > state.edu>, clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu says... > > > > > > > > > > So then why do you care what goes on behind the closed door of the WH? > > > > > > > > > > Oh, yes, I remember, it was a Democrat. > > > > > > > > Newt got canned by Republicans. Nobody is defending his actions. You on > > > > the other hand continue the apology tour. Case closed. > > > > > > No, Newt is posing himself as the darling of the right, and is being > > > received as such. The hypocrisy tour goes on. Case wide open. > > > > > > > Newt isn't going anywhere, he is damaged goods. > > Tell that to your buddy Immoderate. He seems to have missed the memo. We don't have memos in the GOP, we think for ourselves.
From: Moderate on 13 Aug 2010 17:57 BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: > In article <clark-BD5499.14112213082010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio- > state.edu>, clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu says... >> >> In article <MPG.26cefcee8b68156398a1f3(a)news.giganews.com>, >> BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: >> >>> In article <clark-C68C0C.07522913082010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio- >>> state.edu>, clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu says... >>>>>> >>>>>> So then why do you care what goes on behind the closed door of > > > > > > the WH? >>>>>> >>>>>> Oh, yes, I remember, it was a Democrat. >>>>> >>>>> Newt got canned by Republicans. Nobody is defending his actions. > > > > > You on >>>>> the other hand continue the apology tour. Case closed. >>>> >>>> No, Newt is posing himself as the darling of the right, and is > > > > being >>>> received as such. The hypocrisy tour goes on. Case wide open. >>>> >>> >>> Newt isn't going anywhere, he is damaged goods. >> >> Tell that to your buddy Immoderate. He seems to have missed the memo. > > We don't have memos in the GOP, we think for ourselves. Clark gets confused. For some reason he thinks we are at odds on Newt. He missed a memo.
From: Moderate on 13 Aug 2010 17:57
BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: > In article <i43cmq$cip$1(a)speranza.aioe.org>, no_spam_(a)no_mail.com > says... >> >> "BAR" <screw(a)you.com> wrote in message >> news:MPG.26cefd4cd2561d6498a1f5(a)news.giganews.com... >>> >>> When are the Dems going to throw Rangel and Waters under the bus. > > > Doing >>> so would save them a couple of seats in November. >> >> They don't have to throw them under the bus, but it would be nice if > > they >> stopped having rallies for them. > > How much campaign booty did Rangel raise at his belated birthday > party? > Do you believe we will ever know or will it end up in mattresses? It won't show up on his tax return. |