Solitude
in [Golf]
|
Prev: Slicing my 4 iron
Next: Baker is right!
From: Bobby Knight on 5 Dec 2007 12:59 On Wed, 05 Dec 2007 12:51:13 -0500, John van der Pflum <nowhammymyspammy(a)bite.org> wrote: >On Wed, 05 Dec 2007 15:45:25 GMT, Bobby Knight <bknight(a)conramp.net> >wrote: > >>The Moderator Missed that one >>Assimilate @borg >I know who that is. Played golf with him. > >>Carbon >>Fairway Missed those two. >>Pin High >I know who that is. Played golf with him. > >>Annika1980 >I know who that is. Played golf with him. >>BAR >I know who that is. Played golf with him. >>MoiMoi Missed that one. >>Gordo You know who he is. >>Dugjustdug >I know who that is. Played golf with him. >>me >>Sparky >I know who that is. Played golf with him. >>WW Missed that one too John. >> >>Or even Dene. >I know who that is. Never golfed with him. > >How can they be anons if I know who they are? Of course I know many too, but you obviously missed the point John. Rob uses the term anon to fit him when he doesn't have a decent response to a question. You know 7, and don't know 5 of this list. and a good number on this news group doesn't know any of them. -- ___, \o | / \ . "Someone likes every shot"! bk
From: Dene on 5 Dec 2007 13:34 On Dec 5, 7:45 am, Bobby Knight <bkni...(a)conramp.net> wrote: > Patent bullshit, as usual Rob. This "Dene Rule" is stupid in > itself.... Knit's idiocy revealed below. Most of these so-called anoms are known and are as follows... Neither of you call out any of the following for not identifying themselves to all. Well, unless they stick a pin in your fat assed egos. The Moderator Assimilate @borg ---> Bill King > Carbon > Fairway > Pin High > Annika1980-----> Bret > BAR----> Bert Robbins > MoiMoi > Gordo----> Chris Stricker > Dugjustdug---- Doug Rich > me > Sparky----> John King > WW > > Or even Dene---> Greg Schoenberg > > All of these are anons to most of the group. Just because you know > some of them doesn't change that fact. The above who have been named have made no mystery as to their identity. Most of the unnamed ones are long time posters with no history of stalking or causing conflict, in contrast to your butt boy, Dave Jones, and his various anoms. > Answer those that question you with an answer, not a lame excuse not > to answer. Rob did answer. You just don't have the cognitive skills to deal with a contrary answer. Worst of all, you've become obsessed with everything he posts. Get a life, old man. You don't have much time to spare. -Greg
From: mos on 5 Dec 2007 14:04 Dene wrote: > On Dec 5, 7:45 am, Bobby Knight <bkni...(a)conramp.net> wrote: > >> Patent bullshit, as usual Rob. This "Dene Rule" is stupid in >> itself.... > > Knit's idiocy revealed below. Most of these so-called anoms are known > and are as follows... > You missed the point. All of them would have to be known to everyone here in order for none to be anonymous. > Neither of you call out any of the following for not identifying > themselves to all. Well, unless they stick a pin in your fat assed > egos. > > The Moderator > Assimilate @borg ---> Bill King >> Carbon >> Fairway >> Pin High >> Annika1980-----> Bret >> BAR----> Bert Robbins >> MoiMoi >> Gordo----> Chris Stricker >> Dugjustdug---- Doug Rich >> me >> Sparky----> John King >> WW >> >> Or even Dene---> Greg Schoenberg You say that you know 7 out of the 14, and one is yourself. Now are you getting the point? >> >> All of these are anons to most of the group. Just because you know >> some of them doesn't change that fact. > > The above who have been named have made no mystery as to their > identity. Most of the unnamed ones are long time posters with no > history of stalking or causing conflict, in contrast to your butt boy, > Dave Jones, and his various anoms. > You still don't understand. Anonymous is anonymous. Just because you know SOME, doesn't change the fact that those who use aliases are unknown to most. >> Answer those that question you with an answer, not a lame excuse not >> to answer. > > Rob did answer. You just don't have the cognitive skills to deal with > a contrary answer. Worst of all, you've become obsessed with > everything he posts. > There was no answer, and it does seem that you, and the Professor, tend to use the "anon" rule in order to evade pointed remarks. As far as obsessions, that seems to go both ways...and specifically with you to Knight. > Get a life, old man. You don't have much time to spare. > That's a mean-spirited statement. Something that you decry when it comes from others. Pot and kettle. MOS
From: Dene on 5 Dec 2007 14:19 On Dec 5, 11:04 am, mos <mora...(a)hotmail.net> wrote: <dribble deleted> I took a quick scan of your posting history here. You have yet to make a golf related post. Your interests are either political or the posting behavior of Rob or myself. For those reasons and the fact you are anom., I will not take anything you say with any degree of respect or regard. It's unlikely I'll bother to read your posts. -Greg
From: Tex on 5 Dec 2007 14:28
On Dec 5, 1:04 pm, mos <mora...(a)hotmail.net> wrote: > Dene wrote: > > On Dec 5, 7:45 am, Bobby Knight <bkni...(a)conramp.net> wrote: > > >> Patent bullshit, as usual Rob. This "Dene Rule" is stupid in > >> itself.... > > > Knit's idiocy revealed below. Most of these so-called anoms are known > > and are as follows... > > You missed the point. All of them would have to be known to everyone > here in order for none to be anonymous. > > > > > > > Neither of you call out any of the following for not identifying > > themselves to all. Well, unless they stick a pin in your fat assed > > egos. > > > The Moderator > > Assimilate @borg ---> Bill King > >> Carbon > >> Fairway > >> Pin High > >> Annika1980-----> Bret > >> BAR----> Bert Robbins > >> MoiMoi > >> Gordo----> Chris Stricker > >> Dugjustdug---- Doug Rich > >> me > >> Sparky----> John King > >> WW > > >> Or even Dene---> Greg Schoenberg > > You say that you know 7 out of the 14, and one is yourself. Now are you > getting the point? > > > > >> All of these are anons to most of the group. Just because you know > >> some of them doesn't change that fact. > > > The above who have been named have made no mystery as to their > > identity. Most of the unnamed ones are long time posters with no > > history of stalking or causing conflict, in contrast to your butt boy, > > Dave Jones, and his various anoms. > > You still don't understand. Anonymous is anonymous. Just because you > know SOME, doesn't change the fact that those who use aliases are > unknown to most. > > >> Answer those that question you with an answer, not a lame excuse not > >> to answer. > > > Rob did answer. You just don't have the cognitive skills to deal with > > a contrary answer. Worst of all, you've become obsessed with > > everything he posts. > > There was no answer, and it does seem that you, and the Professor, tend > to use the "anon" rule in order to evade pointed remarks. As far as > obsessions, that seems to go both ways...and specifically with you to > Knight.> Get a life, old man. You don't have much time to spare. > > That's a mean-spirited statement. Something that you decry when it > comes from others. Pot and kettle. Don't making Denee mad, he'll call his lawyer. Or maybe his Mommy... Tex |