From: The_Professor on
On Dec 5, 7:03 am, "Kommienezuspadt" <nos...(a)nothanks.net> wrote:
> "Fairway" <armins...(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:bfa71a2d-bda9-4ca6-951e-ba50c4a17d6c(a)e6g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Dec 4, 8:04 pm, BAR <Screw...(a)Your.Place> wrote:
> >> Robert Hamilton wrote:
>
> >> > BAR wrote:
>
> >> >> Robert Hamilton wrote:
> >> >>> BAR wrote:
>
> >> >>>> Kommienezuspadt wrote:
> >> >>>>> "BAR" <Screw...(a)Your.Place> wrote in message
> >> >>>>>news:9p6dnbxTjolYYsjanZ2dnUVZ_o7inZ2d(a)comcast.com...
> >> >>>>>> Robert Hamilton wrote:
> >> >>>>>>> "Ben." wrote:
>
> >> >>>>>>>> On Dec 4, 9:14 am, The_Professor <d...(a)att.net> wrote:
>
> >> >>>>>>>>> ...or play in some sort of regular group, which I
> >> >>>>>>>>> pass on because it is too slow and I am tired of enabling the
> >> >>>>>>>>> posers.
> >> >>>>>>>> What the hell does this even mean?!?!
>
> >> >>>>>>>>>> People have better
> >> >>>>>>>>> things to do than watch a bunch of jerks roll the ball and pick
> >> >>>>>>>>> up
> >> >>>>>>>>> putts on their way to a 5+ hour round of "71".
> >> >>>>>>>> Focus on yourself. And if you aren't man enough to assert
> >> >>>>>>>> yourself
> >> >>>>>>>> and just play through, you deserve to watch every agonizing
> >> >>>>>>>> roll, foot
> >> >>>>>>>> wedge, "two" putt and gimme they play. If I play as a single,
> >> >>>>>>>> and a
> >> >>>>>>>> group like that is dicking around, providing there are open
> >> >>>>>>>> holes
> >> >>>>>>>> ahead, I am playing through. Period.
> >> >>>>>>> I'd like to see you try it!
> >> >>>>>> Ok, I am up for the challenge. Where and when?
> >> >>>>> Can I sell the tickets to the event?
> >> >>>> As long as you pay my travel expenses and greens fees.
> >> >>> I got a place and a prediction any time you want. They go off around
> >> >>> 10AM
> >> >>> everyday, and I can pretty much guarantee that if you try to bull
> >> >>> your way
> >> >>> through them the owner of the course will come out and tell you to
> >> >>> leave the
> >> >>> course, and not give you a refund.
>
> >> >> Ok.
>
> >> > Cool. When do you want to do it?
>
> >> Late March.- Hide quoted text -
>
> >> - Show quoted text -
>
> > OK Corral all over again? F
>
> Hamilton will be showing us his deferment card. He won't be anywhere near
> the action.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Big words coming from some cowardly anon who cowers under the bed to
make posts to this group. Time to invoke the Dene Rule on you. Say
what I want about Dalecki, but he stands up for himself and takes
responsibility for what he posts here...not that it makes any real
difference, as this stuff is 100% meaningless, but here we have
positive prooof that some people are in fact too cowardly to identify
themselves to the people they talk to in a discussion group.
From: Bobby Knight on
On Wed, 5 Dec 2007 07:37:35 -0800 (PST), The_Professor <dbid(a)att.net>
wrote:

>Big words coming from some cowardly anon who cowers under the bed to
>make posts to this group. Time to invoke the Dene Rule on you. Say
>what I want about Dalecki, but he stands up for himself and takes
>responsibility for what he posts here...not that it makes any real
>difference, as this stuff is 100% meaningless, but here we have
>positive prooof that some people are in fact too cowardly to identify
>themselves to the people they talk to in a discussion group.

Patent bullshit, as usual Rob. This "Dene Rule" is stupid in
itself....

Neither of you call out any of the following for not identifying
themselves to all. Well, unless they stick a pin in your fat assed
egos.

The Moderator
Assimilate @borg
Carbon
Fairway
Pin High
Annika1980
BAR
MoiMoi
Gordo
Dugjustdug
me
Sparky
WW

Or even Dene.

All of these are anons to most of the group. Just because you know
some of them doesn't change that fact.

Answer those that question you with an answer, not a lame excuse not
to answer.
--
___,
\o
|
/ \
.
"Someone likes every shot"!
bk
From: The_Professor on
On Dec 5, 9:45 am, Bobby Knight <bkni...(a)conramp.net> wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Dec 2007 07:37:35 -0800 (PST), The_Professor <d...(a)att.net>
> wrote:
>
> >Big words coming from some cowardly anon who cowers under the bed to
> >make posts to this group. Time to invoke the Dene Rule on you. Say
> >what I want about Dalecki, but he stands up for himself and takes
> >responsibility for what he posts here...not that it makes any real
> >difference, as this stuff is 100% meaningless, but here we have
> >positive prooof that some people are in fact too cowardly to identify
> >themselves to the people they talk to in a discussion group.
>
> Patent bullshit, as usual Rob. This "Dene Rule" is stupid in
> itself....
>
> Neither of you call out any of the following for not identifying
> themselves to all. Well, unless they stick a pin in your fat assed
> egos.
>
> The Moderator
> Assimilate @borg
> Carbon
> Fairway
> Pin High
> Annika1980
> BAR
> MoiMoi
> Gordo
> Dugjustdug
> me
> Sparky
> WW
>
> Or even Dene.
>
> All of these are anons to most of the group. Just because you know
> some of them doesn't change that fact.
>
> Answer those that question you with an answer, not a lame excuse not
> to answer.
> --
> ___,
> \o
> |
> / \
> .
> "Someone likes every shot"!
> bk

Anyone who has posted here for any amount of time knows who most of
those people are, even if you don't, a reflection of your declining
cognition I suppose, and most of them would identify themselves to
someone if asked. OIf course you have posted under anons, but the
limiting issue is the hiding of the IP address; the anons who do this
are the total cowards.
From: Bobby Knight on
On Wed, 5 Dec 2007 07:49:22 -0800 (PST), The_Professor <dbid(a)att.net>
wrote:

>On Dec 5, 9:45 am, Bobby Knight <bkni...(a)conramp.net> wrote:
>> On Wed, 5 Dec 2007 07:37:35 -0800 (PST), The_Professor <d...(a)att.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >Big words coming from some cowardly anon who cowers under the bed to
>> >make posts to this group. Time to invoke the Dene Rule on you. Say
>> >what I want about Dalecki, but he stands up for himself and takes
>> >responsibility for what he posts here...not that it makes any real
>> >difference, as this stuff is 100% meaningless, but here we have
>> >positive prooof that some people are in fact too cowardly to identify
>> >themselves to the people they talk to in a discussion group.
>>
>> Patent bullshit, as usual Rob. This "Dene Rule" is stupid in
>> itself....
>>
>> Neither of you call out any of the following for not identifying
>> themselves to all. Well, unless they stick a pin in your fat assed
>> egos.
>>
>> The Moderator
>> Assimilate @borg
>> Carbon
>> Fairway
>> Pin High
>> Annika1980
>> BAR
>> MoiMoi
>> Gordo
>> Dugjustdug
>> me
>> Sparky
>> WW
>>
>> Or even Dene.
>>
>> All of these are anons to most of the group. Just because you know
>> some of them doesn't change that fact.
>>
>> Answer those that question you with an answer, not a lame excuse not
>> to answer.
>> --

>> bk
>
>Anyone who has posted here for any amount of time knows who most of
>those people are, even if you don't, a reflection of your declining
>cognition I suppose, and most of them would identify themselves to
>someone if asked.

Wrong again, as usual. There may be a dozen or so that know all of
these people. But the fact is that they are all anonymous to the
majority here.

You make suppositions with great abandon. The bottom line is that
when you have no answer, you fall back into this lame "anon" pose.
THAT"S the epitome of cowardice. Stand up, as you say that Dalecki
does, and be someone, not the spin doctor that identifies you to all.

>OIf course you have posted under anons, but the
>limiting issue is the hiding of the IP address; the anons who do this
>are the total cowards.

Where have I posted under an anon? Like I have a problem saying what
I think. Your puffery, and absolute egotism is making you very much
the laughingstock. Just check the responses to most of your last
posts. Hell, I don't even have to point out your idiocy...others are
doing it on a wholesale basis.
--
___,
\o
|
/ \
.
"Someone likes every shot"!
bk
From: The_Professor on
On Dec 5, 10:02 am, Bobby Knight <bkni...(a)conramp.net> wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Dec 2007 07:49:22 -0800 (PST), The_Professor <d...(a)att.net>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> >On Dec 5, 9:45 am, Bobby Knight <bkni...(a)conramp.net> wrote:
> >> On Wed, 5 Dec 2007 07:37:35 -0800 (PST), The_Professor <d...(a)att.net>
> >> wrote:
>
> >> >Big words coming from some cowardly anon who cowers under the bed to
> >> >make posts to this group. Time to invoke the Dene Rule on you. Say
> >> >what I want about Dalecki, but he stands up for himself and takes
> >> >responsibility for what he posts here...not that it makes any real
> >> >difference, as this stuff is 100% meaningless, but here we have
> >> >positive prooof that some people are in fact too cowardly to identify
> >> >themselves to the people they talk to in a discussion group.
>
> >> Patent bullshit, as usual Rob. This "Dene Rule" is stupid in
> >> itself....
>
> >> Neither of you call out any of the following for not identifying
> >> themselves to all. Well, unless they stick a pin in your fat assed
> >> egos.
>
> >> The Moderator
> >> Assimilate @borg
> >> Carbon
> >> Fairway
> >> Pin High
> >> Annika1980
> >> BAR
> >> MoiMoi
> >> Gordo
> >> Dugjustdug
> >> me
> >> Sparky
> >> WW
>
> >> Or even Dene.
>
> >> All of these are anons to most of the group. Just because you know
> >> some of them doesn't change that fact.
>
> >> Answer those that question you with an answer, not a lame excuse not
> >> to answer.
> >> --
> >> bk
>
> >Anyone who has posted here for any amount of time knows who most of
> >those people are, even if you don't, a reflection of your declining
> >cognition I suppose, and most of them would identify themselves to
> >someone if asked.
>
> Wrong again, as usual. There may be a dozen or so that know all of
> these people. But the fact is that they are all anonymous to the
> majority here.
>
> You make suppositions with great abandon. The bottom line is that
> when you have no answer, you fall back into this lame "anon" pose.
> THAT"S the epitome of cowardice. Stand up, as you say that Dalecki
> does, and be someone, not the spin doctor that identifies you to all.
>
> >OIf course you have posted under anons, but the
> >limiting issue is the hiding of the IP address; the anons who do this
> >are the total cowards.
>
> Where have I posted under an anon? Like I have a problem saying what
> I think. Your puffery, and absolute egotism is making you very much
> the laughingstock. Just check the responses to most of your last
> posts. Hell, I don't even have to point out your idiocy...others are
> doing it on a wholesale basis.

It doesn't matter a bit who knows this or that person, like Greer for
example. If you don't know glfnaz is Greer, you lack basic cognition
skills. People who post as anons and speak to others anonymously are
cowards, and trolls. Look at this thread. A post about golfing as a
single is lead here by the anon ad not so anon trolls. Maybe I
shouldn't reply, and The Moderater suggests, but the mainstream of the
group seems to have a strong desire to troll, as evidenced by you
here...all you want is a response from me, not much aof a goal for any
aspect of anyone's life, but the actions of you and the other core
trolls here is pretty obvious. In any event I generally ignore you, as
you know, and only respond now because I am waiting on the autoclave
and can't really start anything new until I've poured the plates, and
thus have some time to kill...just so you can see the relevance of
your posting to the person you are directing your comments to. The
simple
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
Prev: Slicing my 4 iron
Next: Baker is right!