Step 9
in [Golf]
|
Prev: health care
Next: adams speedline fast 10 driver
From: Moderate on 16 Feb 2010 14:57 "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote in message news:7u0bh8FhleU1(a)mid.individual.net... > > "Kommienezuspadt" <NoSpam(a)NoThanks.net> wrote in message > news:4b7af32c$0$29237$882e0bbb(a)news.ThunderNews.com... >> >> either I have to believe he read it --- which lowers my respect for him >> to historic lows I did not think possible -- or he lied about reading it. >> > Ahh, Clarks lapdog speaks. I thought Clark was the lap dog. All that yapping.
From: William Clark on 16 Feb 2010 16:05 In article <hletbg$80c$1(a)speranza.aioe.org>, "Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> wrote: > "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote in message > news:7u0bh8FhleU1(a)mid.individual.net... > > > > "Kommienezuspadt" <NoSpam(a)NoThanks.net> wrote in message > > news:4b7af32c$0$29237$882e0bbb(a)news.ThunderNews.com... > >> > >> either I have to believe he read it --- which lowers my respect for him > >> to historic lows I did not think possible -- or he lied about reading it. > >> > > Ahh, Clarks lapdog speaks. > > I thought Clark was the lap dog. All that yapping. Well, at least I can punctuate.
From: Jack Hollis on 16 Feb 2010 19:48 On Tue, 16 Feb 2010 17:50:51 -0500, "Frank Ketchum" <nospam(a)thanksanyway.fu> wrote: >Phil Jones also said (via email) > >"I've just completed Mike's Nature trick of adding in the real temps >to each series for the last 20 years (ie from 1981 onwards) amd from >1961 for Keith's to hide the decline." > >I'm guessing you only focus on some things he said. The guy is a proven liar. Why would anyone assume that he would tell the truth to the BBC. Again, there is absolutely no scientific proof that humans are having any significant impact on global temperature.
From: bknight on 16 Feb 2010 20:05 On Tue, 16 Feb 2010 19:48:00 -0500, Jack Hollis <xsleeper(a)aol.com> wrote: >On Tue, 16 Feb 2010 17:50:51 -0500, "Frank Ketchum" ><nospam(a)thanksanyway.fu> wrote: > >>Phil Jones also said (via email) >> >>"I've just completed Mike's Nature trick of adding in the real temps >>to each series for the last 20 years (ie from 1981 onwards) amd from >>1961 for Keith's to hide the decline." >> >>I'm guessing you only focus on some things he said. > > >The guy is a proven liar. Why would anyone assume that he would tell >the truth to the BBC. > >Again, there is absolutely no scientific proof that humans are having >any significant impact on global temperature. That is just as asinine as someone saying that humans are the absolute cause of global temperature changes. But, Jack Hollis of RSG fame, and no climatological background, has spoken. LOL
From: Jack Hollis on 16 Feb 2010 20:16
On Tue, 16 Feb 2010 19:05:54 -0600, bknight(a)conramp.net wrote: >>Again, there is absolutely no scientific proof that humans are having >>any significant impact on global temperature. > >That is just as asinine as someone saying that humans are the absolute >cause of global temperature changes. > >But, Jack Hollis of RSG fame, and no climatological background, has >spoken. LOL I have no idea how much humans are contributing to the current warming trend and neither does anyone else. Show me the place in the IPCC report where it says with absolute certainty that the current warming trend is being caused by humans. The bottom line is that science is unable to do any such thing. |