From: William Clark on
In article <7u7vriFi27U1(a)mid.individual.net>,
"MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote:

> "William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in message
> news:clark-F1F3A2.08180819022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu...
> > In article <MPG.25e84ba1abf707b4989c07(a)news.giganews.com>,
> > BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote:
> >
> >> In article <wclark2-7FE069.19393518022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-
> >> state.edu>, wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com says...
> >> >
> >> > In article <MPG.25e790c12b2f5efc989bee(a)news.giganews.com>,
> >> > BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > In article <clark-DCE75A.08133518022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-
> >> > > state.edu>, clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu says...
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Please pass along this fact to the IPCC and the "climatologist"
> >> > > > > who
> >> > > > > believe history started with the industrial revolution and that
> >> > > > > the
> >> > > > > billions of years of Earth's existence and climatic cycles that
> >> > > > > preceded
> >> > > > > 1850 should be studied too.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Was CO2 and the Earths temperature ever greater than it is now
> >> > > > > and
> >> > > > > why?
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Which, of course, really hs nothing to do with anything. It is only
> >> > > > the
> >> > > > Sarah Palins of the world that believe the dinosaurs impacted man
> >> > > > (because they walked on earth together), and the dinosaurs died
> >> > > > out.
> >> > > > The
> >> > > > purpose of the contemporary concern with climate is to make sure
> >> > > > that
> >> > > > man doesn't suffer the same fate because of his own ignorance.
> >> > >
> >> > > Talk about hubris.
> >> > >
> >> > > What happens if 1997 XF11 changes its path slightly and impacts the
> >> > > earth in 2028?
> >> > >
> >> > > We are at the mercy of events completely and totally beyond our
> >> > > control.
> >> >
> >> > No, we are talking about events we can control. Do you drive your car
> >> > blindfold just because there is a chance that some red neck in a truck
> >> > will run a red light and broadside you, and you can do nothing about
> >> > it?
> >> > That is beyond your control, but you sure as hell don't resign control
> >> > of your car just because it is.
> >>
> >> We do not live on a planet where we control everything or much of
> >> anything. If you want to return to an existence where you live in a cave
> >> and you gather berries and hunt small animals for your daily sustenance
> >> no one is stopping you.
> >
> > Change of subject - good, clearly an admission of defeat.
>
> Clearly <rolls eyes>.

Glad you saw it, too ;-)
From: William Clark on
In article <7u80f4Fli6U1(a)mid.individual.net>,
"MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote:

> "William Clark" <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in message
> news:wclark2-E847FA.19482218022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu...
> > In article <7u5se0Fp7pU1(a)mid.individual.net>,
> > "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote:
> >
> >> "John B." <johnb505(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
> >> news:7c367a86-319c-4dc0-b889-295421c86eef(a)y17g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...
> >> On Feb 18, 3:11 pm, "MNMikeW" <MNMiik...(a)aol.com> wrote:
> >> > "William Clark" <cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in message
> >> >
> >> > news:clark-81577F.14252318022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu...
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > > In article <7u5a50Fd4...(a)mid.individual.net>,
> >> > > "MNMikeW" <MNMiik...(a)aol.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > >> "William Clark" <cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in
> >> > >> message
> >> > >>news:clark-0771DB.11075018022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu...
> >> > >> > In article <7u55f1Fhn...(a)mid.individual.net>,
> >> > >> > "MNMikeW" <MNMiik...(a)aol.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > >> >> "William Clark" <wcla...(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in message
> >> > >> >>news:wclark2-5A4756.22020617022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu..
> >> > >> >>.
> >> > >> >> > In article <wHUen.74969$RS6.11...(a)newsfe15.iad>,
> >> > >> >> > "Frank Ketchum" <nos...(a)thanksanyway.fu> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > >> >> >> "Carbon" <nob...(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
> >> > >> >> >>news:4b7c1584$0$5110$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com...
> >> > >> >> >> > On Wed, 17 Feb 2010 09:20:58 -0600, MNMikeW wrote:
> >> > >> >> >> >> <bkni...(a)conramp.net> wrote in message
> >> > >> >> >> >>news:7ihmn5lgj229dobctt1r6atpqcq0rurdcu(a)4ax.com...
> >> > >> >> >> >>> On Tue, 16 Feb 2010 20:16:01 -0500, Jack Hollis
> >> > >> >> >> >>> <xslee...(a)aol.com>
> >> > >> >> >> >>> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > >> >> >> >>>>Show me the place in the IPCC report where it says with
> >> > >> >> >> >>>>absolute
> >> > >> >> >> >>>>certainty that the current warming trend is being caused
> >> > >> >> >> >>>>by
> >> > >> >> >> >>>>humans.
> >> >
> >> > >> >> >> >>> There IS no absolute certainty either way or there
> >> > >> >> >> >>> wouldn't
> >> > >> >> >> >>> be
> >> > >> >> >> >>> any
> >> > >> >> >> >>> argument.
> >> >
> >> > >> >> >> >> Exactly Bobby, but the ideologues in the AGW crowd will
> >> > >> >> >> >> have
> >> > >> >> >> >> none
> >> > >> >> >> >> of
> >> > >> >> >> >> that! The science is settled they spew. But it is far from
> >> > >> >> >> >> being
> >> > >> >> >> >> settled.
> >> >
> >> > >> >> >> > Since it's far from settled, you can't exactly say AGW is
> >> > >> >> >> > wrong,
> >> > >> >> >> > now
> >> > >> >> >> > can
> >> > >> >> >> > you?
> >> >
> >> > >> >> >> You can't say that AGW doesn't occur. You also can't say that
> >> > >> >> >> AGW
> >> > >> >> >> does
> >> > >> >> >> occur.
> >> >
> >> > >> >> >> The AGW crowd is wrong in the sense that they have been saying
> >> > >> >> >> for
> >> > >> >> >> years
> >> > >> >> >> that the science is settled and AGW is happening. It was and
> >> > >> >> >> is a
> >> > >> >> >> lie
> >> > >> >> >> plain
> >> > >> >> >> and simple promoted for political reasons masquerading behind
> >> > >> >> >> faulty
> >> > >> >> >> "science".
> >> >
> >> > >> >> > No they have not been saying it is "settled".
> >> >
> >> > >> >> You truely are an idiot.
> >> >
> >> > >> > "Truely"? OK. show me where the science is "settled".
> >> >
> >> > >> It isnt. But somebody might want to tell Al Gore that.
> >> >
> >> > > You clearly have a quote from him claiming that the science is
> >> > > "settled"?
> >> >
> >> > The science is settled, Gore told the lawmakers. Carbon-dioxide
> >> > emissions -
> >> > from cars, power plants, buildings and other sources - are heating the
> >> > Earth's atmosphere.
> >> >
> >> > http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=9047642- Hide
> >> > quoted
> >> > text -
> >> >
> >> > - Show quoted text -
> >>
> >> For climate change deniers, it's much easier to beat up on Al Gore
> >> than to study and respond to the science. But frankly, I don't blame
> >> them. He's arrogant and self-righteous and he does his cause more harm
> >> than good in my view.
> >>
> >> ====================================
> >>
> >> You honestly think calling people skeptical of AGW "deniers" is helping
> >> your
> >> cause? There are plenty of skeptical people who have studied the science.
> >
> > They are deniers because they are skeptics first and foremost, based
> > solely on their political prejudice. Denial to them is much more
> > important than examining the actual data - in fact they deny without
> > even looking at the data. So they have given up any claim to be treated
> > as intelligent or credible. They get whatever comes their way.
>
> You are clueless.

QED.
From: R&B on
On 2010-02-14 18:53:04 -0500, BAR said:

> This about puts the final nail in the coffin of AGW.
snip


Do you EVER post about golf?

Have you EVER posted about golf?

Randy

From: BAR on
In article <2010021918332716807-noneofyourbusiness(a)allcom>,
none_of_your_business(a)all.com says...
>
> On 2010-02-14 18:53:04 -0500, BAR said:
>
> > This about puts the final nail in the coffin of AGW.
> snip
>
>
> Do you EVER post about golf?
>
> Have you EVER posted about golf?
>
> Randy

About as much as you lately.


From: Carbon on
On Sat, 20 Feb 2010 05:33:06 +0000, assimilate wrote:
> On 19-Feb-2010, "John B." <johnb505(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>> I never said I was sure. It's mainly the left-wing crowd saying
>>> they're certain its happening.
>>
>> And nobody on the right says they're certain it's not happening?
>
> only the straw men on the right you create.

Bullshit.
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54
Prev: health care
Next: adams speedline fast 10 driver