From: Jim Lovejoy on
Carbon <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in
news:4b81f556$0$5110$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com:

> On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 03:02:46 +0000, assimilate wrote:
>> On 21-Feb-2010, Carbon <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Inhofe has said repeatedly that global warming is "the biggest hoax
>>>>> ever perpetrated against the American people."
>>>>
>>>> He is not speaking of the climate at all, he is speaking of the
>>>> politically driven tax the wealthy agenda of the IPCC.
>>>
>>> "Global warming is the greatest hoax perpetrated on the American
>>> people." -- Sen. James Inhofe, 2003.
>>
>> exactly, the hoax part is the whole Carbon Tax regime that would "solve
>> all our problems" not to mention the exaggerated threats à la Gorical.
>
> You understand that taxes have nothing to do with whether or not global
> warming is valid, correct?
>
And whether global warming is valid has nothing to do about whether any
particular way of dealing with it is optimum.

Other than the obvious that if global warming is valid, puting your fingers
in your ears and chanting "nha nha can't hear you" is not optimum.
From: BAR on
In article <4b81f556$0$5110$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>,
nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com says...
>
> On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 03:02:46 +0000, assimilate wrote:
> > On 21-Feb-2010, Carbon <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>>> Inhofe has said repeatedly that global warming is "the biggest hoax
> >>>> ever perpetrated against the American people."
> >>>
> >>> He is not speaking of the climate at all, he is speaking of the
> >>> politically driven tax the wealthy agenda of the IPCC.
> >>
> >> "Global warming is the greatest hoax perpetrated on the American
> >> people." -- Sen. James Inhofe, 2003.
> >
> > exactly, the hoax part is the whole Carbon Tax regime that would "solve
> > all our problems" not to mention the exaggerated threats � la Gorical.
>
> You understand that taxes have nothing to do with whether or not global
> warming is valid, correct?

You understand that taxing carbon will not stop the natural cycle of
warming and cooling that the planet has gone through for the last couple
of billion years?
From: Carbon on
On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 00:00:12 -0600, Jim Lovejoy wrote:
> Carbon <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in
> news:4b81f556$0$5110$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com:
>> On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 03:02:46 +0000, assimilate wrote:
>>> On 21-Feb-2010, Carbon <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> Inhofe has said repeatedly that global warming is "the biggest
>>>>>> hoax ever perpetrated against the American people."
>>>>>
>>>>> He is not speaking of the climate at all, he is speaking of the
>>>>> politically driven tax the wealthy agenda of the IPCC.
>>>>
>>>> "Global warming is the greatest hoax perpetrated on the American
>>>> people." -- Sen. James Inhofe, 2003.
>>>
>>> exactly, the hoax part is the whole Carbon Tax regime that would
>>> "solve all our problems" not to mention the exaggerated threats à la
>>> Gorical.
>>
>> You understand that taxes have nothing to do with whether or not
>> global warming is valid, correct?
>>
> And whether global warming is valid has nothing to do about whether
> any particular way of dealing with it is optimum.
>
> Other than the obvious that if global warming is valid, puting your
> fingers in your ears and chanting "nha nha can't hear you" is not
> optimum.

I have said all along that I don't know if AGW is valid or not. Like the
other laymen here, I just don't know enough about it. I also don't know
the best course of action if it is true, although I suspect that
reducing greenhouse gasses would work if we could make it happen.
From: Carbon on
On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 06:49:36 -0500, BAR wrote:
> In article <4b81f556$0$5110$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>,
> nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com says...
>> On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 03:02:46 +0000, assimilate wrote:
>>> On 21-Feb-2010, Carbon <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> Inhofe has said repeatedly that global warming is "the biggest
>>>>>> hoax ever perpetrated against the American people."
>>>>>
>>>>> He is not speaking of the climate at all, he is speaking of the
>>>>> politically driven tax the wealthy agenda of the IPCC.
>>>>
>>>> "Global warming is the greatest hoax perpetrated on the American
>>>> people." -- Sen. James Inhofe, 2003.
>>>
>>> exactly, the hoax part is the whole Carbon Tax regime that would
>>> "solve all our problems" not to mention the exaggerated threats à la
>>> Gorical.
>>
>> You understand that taxes have nothing to do with whether or not
>> global warming is valid, correct?
>
> You understand that taxing carbon will not stop the natural cycle of
> warming and cooling that the planet has gone through for the last
> couple of billion years?

You're certain that any proposed solution will have no discernible
effect, are you? How would that be?
From: BAR on
In article <4b827115$0$4891$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>,
nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com says...
>
> On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 06:49:36 -0500, BAR wrote:
> > In article <4b81f556$0$5110$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>,
> > nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com says...
> >> On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 03:02:46 +0000, assimilate wrote:
> >>> On 21-Feb-2010, Carbon <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>>> Inhofe has said repeatedly that global warming is "the biggest
> >>>>>> hoax ever perpetrated against the American people."
> >>>>>
> >>>>> He is not speaking of the climate at all, he is speaking of the
> >>>>> politically driven tax the wealthy agenda of the IPCC.
> >>>>
> >>>> "Global warming is the greatest hoax perpetrated on the American
> >>>> people." -- Sen. James Inhofe, 2003.
> >>>
> >>> exactly, the hoax part is the whole Carbon Tax regime that would
> >>> "solve all our problems" not to mention the exaggerated threats � la
> >>> Gorical.
> >>
> >> You understand that taxes have nothing to do with whether or not
> >> global warming is valid, correct?
> >
> > You understand that taxing carbon will not stop the natural cycle of
> > warming and cooling that the planet has gone through for the last
> > couple of billion years?
>
> You're certain that any proposed solution will have no discernible
> effect, are you? How would that be?

Yes.

I am.




First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57
Prev: health care
Next: adams speedline fast 10 driver