From: John B. on
On Feb 21, 10:02 pm, assimil...(a)borg.org wrote:
> On 21-Feb-2010, Carbon <nob...(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
>
> > >> Inhofe has said repeatedly that global warming is "the biggest hoax
> > >> ever perpetrated against the American people."
>
> > > He is not speaking of the climate at all, he is speaking of the
> > > politically driven tax the wealthy agenda of the IPCC.
>
> > "Global warming is the greatest hoax perpetrated on the American
> > people." -- Sen. James Inhofe, 2003.
>
> exactly, the hoax part is the whole Carbon Tax regime that would "solve all
> our problems" not to mention the exaggerated threats à la Gorical.
>
> --
> bill-o

That is not what he said and it's not what he meant. He has said 1000
times that human activities aren't warming the atmosphere.
From: John B. on
On Feb 22, 6:49 am, BAR <sc...(a)you.com> wrote:
> In article <4b81f556$0$5110$9a6e1...(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>,
> nob...(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com says...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 03:02:46 +0000, assimilate wrote:
> > > On 21-Feb-2010, Carbon <nob...(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
>
> > >>>> Inhofe has said repeatedly that global warming is "the biggest hoax
> > >>>> ever perpetrated against the American people."
>
> > >>> He is not speaking of the climate at all, he is speaking of the
> > >>> politically driven tax the wealthy agenda of the IPCC.
>
> > >> "Global warming is the greatest hoax perpetrated on the American
> > >> people." -- Sen. James Inhofe, 2003.
>
> > > exactly, the hoax part is the whole Carbon Tax regime that would "solve
> > > all our problems" not to mention the exaggerated threats la Gorical.
>
> > You understand that taxes have nothing to do with whether or not global
> > warming is valid, correct?
>
> You understand that taxing carbon will not stop the natural cycle of
> warming and cooling that the planet has gone through for the last couple
> of billion years?- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

No one has said that it would.
From: William Clark on
In article <MPG.25ec395a5d3a3d01989c3b(a)news.giganews.com>,
BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote:

> In article <4b81f556$0$5110$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>,
> nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com says...
> >
> > On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 03:02:46 +0000, assimilate wrote:
> > > On 21-Feb-2010, Carbon <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>>> Inhofe has said repeatedly that global warming is "the biggest hoax
> > >>>> ever perpetrated against the American people."
> > >>>
> > >>> He is not speaking of the climate at all, he is speaking of the
> > >>> politically driven tax the wealthy agenda of the IPCC.
> > >>
> > >> "Global warming is the greatest hoax perpetrated on the American
> > >> people." -- Sen. James Inhofe, 2003.
> > >
> > > exactly, the hoax part is the whole Carbon Tax regime that would "solve
> > > all our problems" not to mention the exaggerated threats � la Gorical.
> >
> > You understand that taxes have nothing to do with whether or not global
> > warming is valid, correct?
>
> You understand that taxing carbon will not stop the natural cycle of
> warming and cooling that the planet has gone through for the last couple
> of billion years?

That is not the issue. There will be a normal warming and cooling trend
- the question is how much man's waste products are accelerating this
process. The evidence suggests that the effect is significant, and is
swamping the natural cycle to unprecedented levels.
From: assimilate on

On 21-Feb-2010, Carbon <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote:

> >
> > exactly, the hoax part is the whole Carbon Tax regime that would "solve
> > all our problems" not to mention the exaggerated threats à la Gorical.
>
> You understand that taxes have nothing to do with whether or not global
> warming is valid, correct?

Of course, but that is not the hoax part. I think it has been shown that the
globe warmed slightly over the last few hundred years. The hoax part is that
this will continue until the world ends in a flurry of natural disasters
that will destroy mankind. These melodramatic warnings were in fact the hoax
part that was supposed to scare everyone into letting "the experts" save us
from ourselves via the silly Kyoto type carbon tax regime that ultimately is
just the UNs way of globalizing wealth transfers from the industrial world
to the developing world. You really should dig deeper, you seem to stop at
the surface of all your argumentation.

--
bill-o
From: assimilate on

On 22-Feb-2010, Jim Lovejoy <nospam(a)devnull.spam> wrote:

> > You understand that taxes have nothing to do with whether or not global
> > warming is valid, correct?
> >
> And whether global warming is valid has nothing to do about whether any
> particular way of dealing with it is optimum.
>
> Other than the obvious that IF global warming is valid, puting your
> fingers
> in your ears and chanting "nha nha can't hear you" is not optimum.

that IF becomes larger every day as we see what shoddy science is behind
such claims

--
bill-o
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58
Prev: health care
Next: adams speedline fast 10 driver