Step 9
in [Golf]
|
Prev: health care
Next: adams speedline fast 10 driver
From: Dinosaur_Sr on 23 Feb 2010 16:17 On Feb 22, 7:33 pm, William Clark <wcla...(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote: > In article > <a3017451-c593-446e-87d9-c9fff7081...(a)e1g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>, > > > > Dinosaur_Sr <frostback2...(a)att.net> wrote: > > On Feb 22, 4:42 pm, William Clark <cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio- > > state.edu> wrote: > > > In article <3Xxgn.76283$OX4.5...(a)newsfe25.iad>, assimil...(a)borg.org > > > wrote: > > > > > On 22-Feb-2010, William Clark <cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > The evidence suggests that the effect is significant, and is > > > > > swamping the natural cycle to unprecedented levels. > > > > > the <cough, cough> evidence is being called into question. The "proposed" > > > > solutions look worse than the "problem." > > > > No it is not - at least by any one other than the denialists, who have a > > > financial stake in convincing everyone that the emperor has no clothes. > > > The fact remains that the quibbles that heave been blown into mountains > > > are just that - minor quibbles. The main predictions and conclusions > > > remain, in spite of what a certain hysterical section of the media would > > > have us believe. > > > What "major prediction" in this area has come to be...and they have > > been making them for 40 years now. Name one that has happened. > > That eight different global warming models indicate the current > accelerated global warming? About your speed I guess. The issue is hysteria. I'll grant the global warming, and even if so, so what? How about ice caps melting and cities flooding? How about accelerated increases in high intensity hurricanes and tornadoes? They all never happened.
From: Moderate on 23 Feb 2010 16:48 "William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in message news:clark-ED8D5F.10364323022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > In article <hm0mr7$k8a$1(a)speranza.aioe.org>, > "Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> wrote: >> >> Time and time again we see instances of no peer review performed on AGW >> 'science.' > > Really? I am sure you cite these "time and time again" incidents of "no > peer review". Please do - and don't try to palm us off with your usual > "you can find them yourself" BS. The cites have been previously posted. You persist in ignoring them.
From: Moderate on 23 Feb 2010 16:49 "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote in message news:7uic9jFlf5U1(a)mid.individual.net... > > Clark, you have nothing as usual. All bluster, all the time. Tru dat.
From: Moderate on 23 Feb 2010 16:55 "William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in message news:clark-80C8A4.14011723022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > In article <7uicbtFlqaU1(a)mid.individual.net>, > "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: >> >> There is none more suckered here than you. > > Very clever - now back into the corner. Looks like it is Clark who is backed into a corner.
From: John B. on 23 Feb 2010 17:20
On Feb 23, 4:17 pm, Dinosaur_Sr <frostback2...(a)att.net> wrote: > On Feb 22, 7:33 pm, William Clark <wcla...(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > In article > > <a3017451-c593-446e-87d9-c9fff7081...(a)e1g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>, > > > Dinosaur_Sr <frostback2...(a)att.net> wrote: > > > On Feb 22, 4:42 pm, William Clark <cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio- > > > state.edu> wrote: > > > > In article <3Xxgn.76283$OX4.5...(a)newsfe25.iad>, assimil...(a)borg.org > > > > wrote: > > > > > > On 22-Feb-2010, William Clark <cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > The evidence suggests that the effect is significant, and is > > > > > > swamping the natural cycle to unprecedented levels. > > > > > > the <cough, cough> evidence is being called into question. The "proposed" > > > > > solutions look worse than the "problem." > > > > > No it is not - at least by any one other than the denialists, who have a > > > > financial stake in convincing everyone that the emperor has no clothes. > > > > The fact remains that the quibbles that heave been blown into mountains > > > > are just that - minor quibbles. The main predictions and conclusions > > > > remain, in spite of what a certain hysterical section of the media would > > > > have us believe. > > > > What "major prediction" in this area has come to be...and they have > > > been making them for 40 years now. Name one that has happened. > > > That eight different global warming models indicate the current > > accelerated global warming? > > About your speed I guess. The issue is hysteria. I'll grant the global > warming, and even if so, so what? How about ice caps melting and > cities flooding? How about accelerated increases in high intensity > hurricanes and tornadoes? They all never happened.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - The polar ice cap IS melting. There HAS been an increase in the intensity of hurricanes. |