From: BAR on
In article <4b881247$0$4876$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>,
nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com says...
>
> On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 08:32:54 -0500, BAR wrote:
> > In article <4b872a77$0$5094$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>,
> > nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com says...
> >> On Thu, 25 Feb 2010 20:36:55 -0500, BAR wrote:
> >>> In article <4b870bdd$0$4863$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>,
> >>> nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com says...
> >>>> On Thu, 25 Feb 2010 08:32:46 -0500, BAR wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> I haven't payed for computer time in years. I can't believe that
> >>>>> you are not using a Linux cluster, 16, 32, 64 or 128 quad
> >>>>> processor Linux systems with 64 GB of RAM should make a nice
> >>>>> little parallel processing system.
> >>>>
> >>>> Is computer time free on these systems?
> >>>>
> >>>> http://www.top500.org/list/2009/11/100
> >>>
> >>> Looks like a majority of them are just a bunch of massively parallel
> >>> systems.
> >>>
> >>> The Air Force is making a supercomputer out of Sony PS3's.
> >>>
> >>> http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/345642/
> >>> Air_Force_Taps_PlayStation _3_for_Research
> >>>
> >>> The supercomputer isn't what it used to be.
> >>
> >> Correct. They are much more powerful than they used to be. Powerful
> >> enough to analyze very large data sets, such as those climatologists
> >> work with.
> >
> > Back in the day, when supercomputers emerged there were two primary
> > activities that supercomputers were sought out to perform. One was
> > nuclear warhead design and the other was weather prediction.
> >
> > Are climatologists now predicting tomorrows weather?
>
> Not just tomorrow. But yes, obviously.

I thought climate and weather were different animals so to speak.
Meaning that the problem that the meteorologists constant failure to
predict accurately the weather 5 days from now can't be used against
climatologists and their ability to predict the climate 1,000 years from
now.

And, since quite a few climatologists start out as geologists please ask
them to tell me when the next volcano is going to erupt. They need to be
specific and provide a date and time. We only need them to predict to
the hour.
From: Jack Hollis on
On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 15:40:22 -0600, "Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com>
wrote:

>"BAR" <screw(a)you.com> wrote in message
>news:MPG.25f1832068d96abc989c6b(a)news.giganews.com...
>>
>> Back in the day, when supercomputers emerged there were two primary
>> activities that supercomputers were sought out to perform. One was
>> nuclear warhead design and the other was weather prediction.
>>
>> Are climatologists now predicting tomorrows weather?
>
>No, they can't make an accurate prediction that far in the future, but they
>have this AGW locked as a sure thing.


Now they find out that 90% of the temperature monitoring sites in the
US are close enough to a heat sources as to make them inaccurate.
From: William Clark on
In article <hm9f45$go8$1(a)speranza.aioe.org>,
"Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> wrote:

> "BAR" <screw(a)you.com> wrote in message
> news:MPG.25f1832068d96abc989c6b(a)news.giganews.com...
> >
> > Back in the day, when supercomputers emerged there were two primary
> > activities that supercomputers were sought out to perform. One was
> > nuclear warhead design and the other was weather prediction.
> >
> > Are climatologists now predicting tomorrows weather?
>
> No, they can't make an accurate prediction that far in the future, but they
> have this AGW locked as a sure thing.

Have you figured out the difference between climatologists and
meteorologists yet?

Obviously not.
From: BAR on
In article <wclark2-331759.09081327022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-
state.edu>, wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com says...
>
> In article <hm9f45$go8$1(a)speranza.aioe.org>,
> "Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> wrote:
>
> > "BAR" <screw(a)you.com> wrote in message
> > news:MPG.25f1832068d96abc989c6b(a)news.giganews.com...
> > >
> > > Back in the day, when supercomputers emerged there were two primary
> > > activities that supercomputers were sought out to perform. One was
> > > nuclear warhead design and the other was weather prediction.
> > >
> > > Are climatologists now predicting tomorrows weather?
> >
> > No, they can't make an accurate prediction that far in the future, but they
> > have this AGW locked as a sure thing.
>
> Have you figured out the difference between climatologists and
> meteorologists yet?
>
> Obviously not.

There is a big difference.

Climatologists believe that history started in 1850, meteorologists
don't.

Meteorologist tell you that their models are not absolute,
climatologists are convinced that their models are absolute.


From: John B. on
On Feb 27, 9:35 am, BAR <sc...(a)you.com> wrote:
> In article <wclark2-331759.09081327022...(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-
> state.edu>, wcla...(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com says...
>
>
>
>
>
> > In article <hm9f45$go...(a)speranza.aioe.org>,
> >  "Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> wrote:
>
> > > "BAR" <sc...(a)you.com> wrote in message
> > >news:MPG.25f1832068d96abc989c6b(a)news.giganews.com...
>
> > > > Back in the day, when supercomputers emerged there were two primary
> > > > activities that supercomputers were sought out to perform. One was
> > > > nuclear warhead design and the other was weather prediction.
>
> > > > Are climatologists now predicting tomorrows weather?
>
> > > No, they can't make an accurate prediction that far in the future, but they
> > > have this AGW locked as a sure thing.
>
> > Have you figured out the difference between climatologists and
> > meteorologists yet?
>
> > Obviously not.
>
> There is a big difference.
>
> Climatologists believe that history started in 1850, meteorologists
> don't.
>
> Meteorologist tell you that their models are not absolute,
> climatologists are convinced that their models are absolute.

Find me one climatologists who says his model is absolute.
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76
Prev: health care
Next: adams speedline fast 10 driver