Step 9
in [Golf]
|
Prev: health care
Next: adams speedline fast 10 driver
From: BAR on 14 Feb 2010 18:53 This about puts the final nail in the coffin of AGW. http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/environment/article7026317.ece http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1250872/Climategate-U-turn- Astonishment-scientist-centre-global-warming-email-row-admits-data- organised.html http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-1250813/MAIL-ON-SUNDAY- COMMENT-The-professors-amazing-climate-change-retreat.html
From: Jack Hollis on 14 Feb 2010 21:24 On Sun, 14 Feb 2010 18:53:04 -0500, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: >This about puts the final nail in the coffin of AGW. > >http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/environment/article7026317.ece > >http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1250872/Climategate-U-turn- >Astonishment-scientist-centre-global-warming-email-row-admits-data- >organised.html > >http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-1250813/MAIL-ON-SUNDAY- >COMMENT-The-professors-amazing-climate-change-retreat.html Final nail? I don't think so. AGW has taken on the trappings of a religious cult. "The federal budget for 2011 proposes $2.6 billion for the Global Change Research Program, a 21 percent boost over 2010. It will bring funding to a level higher than under any administration dating back to 1989 -- when global warming first attracted federal budget funds." What do you bet that climate scientists that are skeptical of AGW don't get any of this money?
From: MNMikeW on 15 Feb 2010 12:05 "BAR" <screw(a)you.com> wrote in message news:MPG.25e256eb4972048989bbf(a)news.giganews.com... > This about puts the final nail in the coffin of AGW. > > http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/environment/article7026317.ece > > http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1250872/Climategate-U-turn- > Astonishment-scientist-centre-global-warming-email-row-admits-data- > organised.html > > http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-1250813/MAIL-ON-SUNDAY- > COMMENT-The-professors-amazing-climate-change-retreat.html "We concluded, with overwhelming statistical significance, that the IPCC's climate data are contaminated with surface effects from industrialisation and data quality problems. These add up to a large warming bias," he said. " I wonder what the esteemed Mr. Clark has to say about this?
From: Frank Ketchum on 15 Feb 2010 12:41 "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote in message news:7ttd6sFpf4U1(a)mid.individual.net... > > "BAR" <screw(a)you.com> wrote in message > news:MPG.25e256eb4972048989bbf(a)news.giganews.com... >> This about puts the final nail in the coffin of AGW. >> >> http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/environment/article7026317.ece >> >> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1250872/Climategate-U-turn- >> Astonishment-scientist-centre-global-warming-email-row-admits-data- >> organised.html >> >> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-1250813/MAIL-ON-SUNDAY- >> COMMENT-The-professors-amazing-climate-change-retreat.html > > "We concluded, with overwhelming statistical significance, that the IPCC's > climate data are contaminated with surface effects from industrialisation > and data quality problems. These add up to a large warming bias," he said. > " A long way of saying that they were lying. > I wonder what the esteemed Mr. Clark has to say about this? As if you don't already know.
From: BAR on 15 Feb 2010 12:54
In article <7ttd6sFpf4U1(a)mid.individual.net>, MNMiikkew(a)aol.com says... > > "BAR" <screw(a)you.com> wrote in message > news:MPG.25e256eb4972048989bbf(a)news.giganews.com... > > This about puts the final nail in the coffin of AGW. > > > > http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/environment/article7026317.ece > > > > http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1250872/Climategate-U-turn- > > Astonishment-scientist-centre-global-warming-email-row-admits-data- > > organised.html > > > > http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-1250813/MAIL-ON-SUNDAY- > > COMMENT-The-professors-amazing-climate-change-retreat.html > > "We concluded, with overwhelming statistical significance, that the IPCC's > climate data are contaminated with surface effects from industrialisation > and data quality problems. These add up to a large warming bias," he said. " > > I wonder what the esteemed Mr. Clark has to say about this? It is nice to know that the Medieval Warm Period and Little Ice Age have been granted parole and has been let out of scientific jail (http://poneke.wordpress.com/2009/12/21/con/) and (http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/12/19/more-on-wikipedia-and-connolley- hes-been-canned-as-a-wiki-administrator/) |