Support Sharon Angle
in [Golf]
|
From: BAR on 20 Jul 2010 17:47 In article <wclark2-CEF6F3.16555720072010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio- state.edu>, wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com says... > > In article <i24uel$6tc$1(a)speranza.aioe.org>, > "Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> wrote: > > > "William Clark" <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in message > > news:wclark2-35ED66.12303120072010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > > > In article <i2488q$2pe$1(a)speranza.aioe.org>, > > > "Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> wrote: > > > > > >> "William Clark" <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in message > > >> news:wclark2-3D1A38.07572020072010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > > >> > In article > > >> > <1435564869301314484.278002nospam-nomail.com(a)news.suddenlink.net>, > > >> > Moderate <nospam(a)nomail.com> wrote: > > >> > > > >> >> William Clark <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote: > > >> >> > In article <pav94617bdmv0rsbtea028t1ed4e2f2i98(a)4ax.com>, > > >> >> > bknight(a)conramp.net wrote: > > >> >> > > > >> >> > Indeed, with any luck, she'll be front and center next time around. > > >> >> > > >> >> Well, she is no Alvin Greene. > > >> > > > >> > I think she might "refudiate" that. > > >> > > >> No surprise that you would support a guy like Alvin Greene. > > > > > > Who said I did? I "refudiate" that. > > > > Off course you do. You would like Alvin to disappear, because comparing him > > to ANY Republican is too embarrassing for you. > > What in God's name are you talking about? "Embarrassing" has nothing to > do with it - he's a poor candidate. Period. Something that you could > never be man enough to admit about Eskimo Barbie, but that's the > difference between you wingnuts and those with an IQ. He is the choice of the Democrats in South Carolina to be their candidate for Senator in the general election. Good or poor candidate won't be determined until after the election.
From: William Clark on 20 Jul 2010 17:56 In article <MPG.26afe370bc91b97898a139(a)news.giganews.com>, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: > In article <wclark2-CEF6F3.16555720072010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio- > state.edu>, wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com says... > > > > In article <i24uel$6tc$1(a)speranza.aioe.org>, > > "Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> wrote: > > > > > "William Clark" <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in message > > > news:wclark2-35ED66.12303120072010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > > > > In article <i2488q$2pe$1(a)speranza.aioe.org>, > > > > "Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > >> "William Clark" <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in message > > > >> news:wclark2-3D1A38.07572020072010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > > > >> > In article > > > >> > <1435564869301314484.278002nospam-nomail.com(a)news.suddenlink.net>, > > > >> > Moderate <nospam(a)nomail.com> wrote: > > > >> > > > > >> >> William Clark <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote: > > > >> >> > In article <pav94617bdmv0rsbtea028t1ed4e2f2i98(a)4ax.com>, > > > >> >> > bknight(a)conramp.net wrote: > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > Indeed, with any luck, she'll be front and center next time > > > >> >> > around. > > > >> >> > > > >> >> Well, she is no Alvin Greene. > > > >> > > > > >> > I think she might "refudiate" that. > > > >> > > > >> No surprise that you would support a guy like Alvin Greene. > > > > > > > > Who said I did? I "refudiate" that. > > > > > > Off course you do. You would like Alvin to disappear, because comparing > > > him > > > to ANY Republican is too embarrassing for you. > > > > What in God's name are you talking about? "Embarrassing" has nothing to > > do with it - he's a poor candidate. Period. Something that you could > > never be man enough to admit about Eskimo Barbie, but that's the > > difference between you wingnuts and those with an IQ. > > He is the choice of the Democrats in South Carolina to be their > candidate for Senator in the general election. Good or poor candidate > won't be determined until after the election. Yes, and Republicans in the same state elected Mark Sanford for their Governor. Do you see a pattern here between South Carolinians and their ability to handle elections like adults?
From: BAR on 20 Jul 2010 18:25 In article <alangbaker-920CF5.09104620072010(a)news.shawcable.com>, alangbaker(a)telus.net says... > > In article <MPG.26af55fd1a11596b98a134(a)news.giganews.com>, > BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: > > > In article <k1r9469e2p32o4bhjpb4ollsaeiu4s38ch(a)4ax.com>, > > howard(a)brazee.net says... > > > > > > On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 10:28:51 -0700 (PDT), dsc-ky > > > <Dudley.Cornman(a)eku.edu> wrote: > > > > > > >Is it really that clear cut.? I consider the health care bill > > > >oppresive. He had a huge part in that. > > > > > > How do you expect to be oppressed by it? > > > > > > It switched how we pay for the poor from higher hospital costs (passed > > > on to our insurance companies), to higher taxes paying for insurance. > > > > > > That's oppressive? That's hardly different from what we are doing > > > now! > > > > The poor should be paying for their own health care just like they pay > > for their own food, cars, cell phone, plasma TVs, .... > > This fantasy "poor" you've invented is solely so you can abdicate your > responsibilities as a human being. Call it whatever you want. I am not responsible for someone else's bad choice just like I am not entitled to benefit from someone else's good choices. If you want to talk about abdicating responsibilities as a human being I will assume that you have done just that due to the fact that you haven't given all of your means above your basic needs away to the poor.
From: Howard Brazee on 20 Jul 2010 19:00 On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 13:31:06 -0500, bknight(a)conramp.net wrote: >>So you don't know any poor people? You haven't ever seen a person paying >>for groceries with food stamps and talking on their cell phone? Never seen >>a poor person play the lottery every week, smoke, drink, drug, drive or >>watch cable TV? >> > >The food stamp thing isn't a de terminating fact. Maybe a person who >you describe is using stamps to buy for someone else. Or buying food for their family while keeping the phone for which they have a multi-year contract, to aid in their job search. It's easy to make assumptions. -- "In no part of the constitution is more wisdom to be found, than in the clause which confides the question of war or peace to the legislature, and not to the executive department." - James Madison
From: Howard Brazee on 20 Jul 2010 19:02
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 06:28:22 -0700 (PDT), "John B." <johnb505(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >Is it really that clear cut.? I consider the health care bill >> >oppresive. He had a huge part in that. >> >> How do you expect to be oppressed by it? >> >> It switched how we pay for the poor from higher hospital costs (passed >> on to our insurance companies), to higher taxes paying for insurance. >> >> That's oppressive? �That's hardly different from what we are doing >> now! >> >Have you taxes gotten higher? Mine haven't. That's a worse case scenario with the health care. But the deficit is a tax. When they lowered taxes for the wealthy and kept spending money, we are all paying. We just can't point to exactly which program created which cost. -- "In no part of the constitution is more wisdom to be found, than in the clause which confides the question of war or peace to the legislature, and not to the executive department." - James Madison |