Support Sharon Angle
in [Golf]
|
From: Howard Brazee on 20 Jul 2010 20:48 On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 18:48:39 -0400, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: >> The food stamp thing isn't a de terminating fact. Maybe a person who >> you describe is using stamps to buy for someone else. > >It is illegal to give your food stamps to someone else. But it is not illegal to go to the store and buy stuff for someone disabled using his food stamps. -- "In no part of the constitution is more wisdom to be found, than in the clause which confides the question of war or peace to the legislature, and not to the executive department." - James Madison
From: Howard Brazee on 20 Jul 2010 20:50 On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 17:18:46 -0700 (PDT), "John B." <johnb505(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> So you don't know any poor people? �You haven't ever seen a person paying >> for groceries with food stamps and talking on their cell phone? �Never seen >> a poor person play the lottery every week, smoke, drink, drug, drive or >> watch cable TV? > >Cell phones are cheaper than land-line phones. How bad off does a >person have to be to earn your appellation as "poor?" Too poor to keep the tools needed to find a job???? -- "In no part of the constitution is more wisdom to be found, than in the clause which confides the question of war or peace to the legislature, and not to the executive department." - James Madison
From: William Clark on 20 Jul 2010 21:09 In article <MPG.26b002fd77ab853398a140(a)news.giganews.com>, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: > In article <wclark2-501CEE.17564620072010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio- > state.edu>, wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com says... > > > > What in God's name are you talking about? "Embarrassing" has nothing to > > > > do with it - he's a poor candidate. Period. Something that you could > > > > never be man enough to admit about Eskimo Barbie, but that's the > > > > difference between you wingnuts and those with an IQ. > > > > > > He is the choice of the Democrats in South Carolina to be their > > > candidate for Senator in the general election. Good or poor candidate > > > won't be determined until after the election. > > > > Yes, and Republicans in the same state elected Mark Sanford for their > > Governor. Do you see a pattern here between South Carolinians and their > > ability to handle elections like adults? > > > > Now you are disparaging the entire state of South Carolina. Well, it does seem that they could do with adult supervision when it comes to their politics.
From: William Clark on 20 Jul 2010 21:09 In article <1656726425301364047.295108nospam-nomail.com(a)news.suddenlink.net>, Moderate <nospam(a)nomail.com> wrote: > BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: > > In article <wclark2-501CEE.17564620072010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio- > > state.edu>, wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com says... > >>>> What in God's name are you talking about? "Embarrassing" has > > > > > nothing to > >>>> do with it - he's a poor candidate. Period. Something that you > > > > > could > >>>> never be man enough to admit about Eskimo Barbie, but that's the > >>>> difference between you wingnuts and those with an IQ. > >>> > >>> He is the choice of the Democrats in South Carolina to be their > >>> candidate for Senator in the general election. Good or poor > > > > candidate > >>> won't be determined until after the election. > >> > >> Yes, and Republicans in the same state elected Mark Sanford for their > > > > >> Governor. Do you see a pattern here between South Carolinians and > > > their > >> ability to handle elections like adults? > >> > > > > Now you are disparaging the entire state of South Carolina. > > He likes to avoid specifics. See above.
From: Carbon on 20 Jul 2010 21:41
On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 00:13:26 +0000, Moderate wrote: > Carbon <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote: >> On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 10:33:54 +0000, Moderate wrote: >>> Carbon <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote: >>>> On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 15:32:29 -0700, dene wrote: >>>>> "dsc-ky" <Dudley.Cornman(a)eku.edu> wrote in message >>>>> news:05db752e-22da-4c95-91c0- >>>>> c95b3d95e03f(a)d8g2000yqf.googlegroups.com... >>>>> >>>>>> So what makes "others" right? It's going to mean a lot of money >>>>>> out of out pockets... at the very least. >>>>> >>>>> The insured pay the uninsured medical bills. That's plenty of out >>>>> of pocket for the responsible insured. This distinction with O's >>>>> plan is that the uninsured slacker will have the choice to buy >>>>> insurance or pay extra taxes. Either way, they pay instead of us >>>>> paying their bills for them. >>>> >>>> There are other consequences. I worked with a fellow who had been >>>> laid off for nearly a year due to the recession. He could not >>>> afford COBRA and keep his family fed. He got cancer. He died last >>>> week. >>> >>> How does Obama's plan help your friend? >> >> It doesn't. Universal healthcare would have helped him, but big >> healthcare did everything they could to get that shot down. > > Obama care is big health care. Actually, bigger health care. How do you know his plan will cost more than the system it's replacing? Fox News? |