From: Moderate on 21 Jul 2010 08:52 "William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in message news:clark-1BF6A4.08132321072010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > In article <i26nog$qu3$2(a)speranza.aioe.org>, > "Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> wrote: > >> "William Clark" <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in message >> news:wclark2-CEF6F3.16555720072010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... >> > In article <i24uel$6tc$1(a)speranza.aioe.org>, >> > "Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> Off course you do. You would like Alvin to disappear, because >> >> comparing >> >> him >> >> to ANY Republican is too embarrassing for you. >> > >> > What in God's name are you talking about? "Embarrassing" has nothing to >> > do with it - he's a poor candidate. Period. Something that you could >> > never be man enough to admit about Eskimo Barbie, but that's the >> > difference between you wingnuts and those with an IQ. >> >> You are projecting again. I have been critical of Palin as have other >> conservatives posting here. > > Only because she is a loser. If she wasn't, you'd be her main champion. You are contradicting yourself and your statement is false.
From: dsc-ky on 21 Jul 2010 09:20 > As soon as my kids are out of high-school my land-line phone is gone.- Hide quoted text - Why the wait?
From: dsc-ky on 21 Jul 2010 09:28 > > You are projecting again. I have been critical of Palin as have other > > conservatives posting here. > > Only because she is a loser. If she wasn't, you'd be her main champion.- Hide quoted text - If she weren't a "loser" as you put it, then what be wrong with championing her? Bummer is a loser too... they made him pres for it.
From: William Clark on 21 Jul 2010 10:01 In article <i26qie$vt5$1(a)speranza.aioe.org>, "Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> wrote: > "William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in message > news:clark-1BF6A4.08132321072010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > > In article <i26nog$qu3$2(a)speranza.aioe.org>, > > "Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> wrote: > > > >> "William Clark" <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in message > >> news:wclark2-CEF6F3.16555720072010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > >> > In article <i24uel$6tc$1(a)speranza.aioe.org>, > >> > "Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> wrote: > >> >> > >> >> Off course you do. You would like Alvin to disappear, because > >> >> comparing > >> >> him > >> >> to ANY Republican is too embarrassing for you. > >> > > >> > What in God's name are you talking about? "Embarrassing" has nothing to > >> > do with it - he's a poor candidate. Period. Something that you could > >> > never be man enough to admit about Eskimo Barbie, but that's the > >> > difference between you wingnuts and those with an IQ. > >> > >> You are projecting again. I have been critical of Palin as have other > >> conservatives posting here. > > > > Only because she is a loser. If she wasn't, you'd be her main champion. > > You are contradicting yourself and your statement is false. Well, there you have it then. Another definitive analysis from the master of nothing.
From: bknight on 21 Jul 2010 10:03
On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 07:41:32 -0400, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: >In article <alangbaker-DA11CF.22172320072010(a)news.shawcable.com>, >alangbaker(a)telus.net says... >> > > > The poor should be paying for their own health care just like they pay >> > > > for their own food, cars, cell phone, plasma TVs, .... >> > > >> > > This fantasy "poor" you've invented is solely so you can abdicate your >> > > responsibilities as a human being. >> > >> > Call it whatever you want. I am not responsible for someone else's bad >> > choice just like I am not entitled to benefit from someone else's good >> > choices. >> > >> > If you want to talk about abdicating responsibilities as a human being I >> > will assume that you have done just that due to the fact that you >> > haven't given all of your means above your basic needs away to the poor. >> >> Nope. I recognize that we have a responsibility to help other people in >> need because it is the right thing to do. That doesn't mean "giving all >> of [one's] means above basic needs away". >> >> Look up "false dichotomy". >> > >Where does your responsibility come from, to help others. Well, he's tried to make you think for once in your life. But....sometimes help is ignored. BK |