Support Sharon Angle
in [Golf]
|
From: Alan Baker on 21 Jul 2010 13:13 In article <8aonrgFsg2U1(a)mid.individual.net>, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > "Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message > news:alangbaker-64767B.09543621072010(a)news.shawcable.com... > > In article <8aomoaFlv4U1(a)mid.individual.net>, > > "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > > > >> "dsc-ky" <Dudley.Cornman(a)eku.edu> wrote in message > >> news:39410c1e-6847-41aa-90e8-057d614201d1(a)q35g2000yqn.googlegroups.com... > >> > >> > > You are projecting again. I have been critical of Palin as have other > >> > > conservatives posting here. > >> > > >> > Only because she is a loser. If she wasn't, you'd be her main > >> > champion.- > >> > Hide quoted text - > >> > >> > >> If she weren't a "loser" as you put it, then what be wrong with > >> championing her? > >> > >> > >> Bummer is a loser too... they made him pres for it. > >> > >> ------------------------------------- > >> > >> Obama is nothing more than a Blagojevich clone. Spreading the corruption > >> of > >> Chicago politics nationwide. > > > > LOL > > > Another riveting Alan "the gnat" Baker post. I gave your post the reply it deserved. -- Alan Baker Vancouver, British Columbia <http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg>
From: Alan Baker on 21 Jul 2010 13:15 In article <8aon65FodgU1(a)mid.individual.net>, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > "Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message > news:alangbaker-816E1E.09450721072010(a)news.shawcable.com... > > In article <i277h0$n04$1(a)speranza.aioe.org>, > > "Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> wrote: > > > >> "Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message > >> news:alangbaker-87D77B.08231221072010(a)news.shawcable.com... > >> > In article > >> > <1988069854301399651.689102nospam-nomail.com(a)news.suddenlink.net>, > >> > Moderate <nospam(a)nomail.com> wrote: > >> > > >> > Wait: "We know Bush did not lie"???? > >> > > >> > > >> > LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL > >> > >> Well only those of us who have reviewed all of the Congressional > >> investigations. > >> > >> You might want to start with the Silberman-Robb Report. > > > > You might want to start there by showing where it concludes that the > > Bush didn't lie. > > > Perhaps you can show us where it concludes he did lie instead of your > textbook LOL bullshit. I know that it didn't even examine the question of whether or not Bush lied. I know that it was chaired by a Republican and a Democrat beholden to the administration by virtue of his sitting on the Board of Trustees of the MITRE Corporation which has revenues of more than a billion dollars. -- Alan Baker Vancouver, British Columbia <http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg>
From: MNMikeW on 21 Jul 2010 13:23 <bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message news:4u9e469cpbjme87n2jgtpomh5sk8ssk474(a)4ax.com... > On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 11:49:14 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> > wrote: > >> >>"dsc-ky" <Dudley.Cornman(a)eku.edu> wrote in message >>news:39410c1e-6847-41aa-90e8-057d614201d1(a)q35g2000yqn.googlegroups.com... >> >>> > You are projecting again. I have been critical of Palin as have other >>> > conservatives posting here. >>> >>> Only because she is a loser. If she wasn't, you'd be her main champion.- >>> Hide quoted text - >> >> >>If she weren't a "loser" as you put it, then what be wrong with >>championing her? >> >> >>Bummer is a loser too... they made him pres for it. >> >>------------------------------------- >> >>Obama is nothing more than a Blagojevich clone. Spreading the corruption >>of >>Chicago politics nationwide. >> > Mike, that is just plain bullshit and I'm surprised that you would > even go there. You know better. > > I know you don't like Obama, but accusing him of corruption is below > you. I detested Bush but knew better than to throw out trash like > this about him. > Acorns(pun intended)don't fall far from the tree. Just look at some of the losers he's surrounded himself with.
From: Moderate on 21 Jul 2010 13:57 "Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message news:alangbaker-816E1E.09450721072010(a)news.shawcable.com... > In article <i277h0$n04$1(a)speranza.aioe.org>, > "Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> wrote: > >> "Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message >> news:alangbaker-87D77B.08231221072010(a)news.shawcable.com... >> > In article >> > <1988069854301399651.689102nospam-nomail.com(a)news.suddenlink.net>, >> > Moderate <nospam(a)nomail.com> wrote: >> > >> > Wait: "We know Bush did not lie"???? >> > >> > >> > LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL >> >> Well only those of us who have reviewed all of the Congressional >> investigations. >> >> You might want to start with the Silberman-Robb Report. > > You might want to start there by showing where it concludes that the > Bush didn't lie. > > And you might want to remember that all you've been allowed to see is > the unclassified version. What lie are you talking about?
From: Moderate on 21 Jul 2010 13:59
"Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message news:alangbaker-351ABA.10151421072010(a)news.shawcable.com... > In article <8aon65FodgU1(a)mid.individual.net>, > "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > >> "Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message >> news:alangbaker-816E1E.09450721072010(a)news.shawcable.com... >> > In article <i277h0$n04$1(a)speranza.aioe.org>, >> > "Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> wrote: >> > >> >> "Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message >> >> news:alangbaker-87D77B.08231221072010(a)news.shawcable.com... >> >> > In article >> >> > <1988069854301399651.689102nospam-nomail.com(a)news.suddenlink.net>, >> >> > Moderate <nospam(a)nomail.com> wrote: >> >> > >> >> > Wait: "We know Bush did not lie"???? >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL >> >> >> >> Well only those of us who have reviewed all of the Congressional >> >> investigations. >> >> >> >> You might want to start with the Silberman-Robb Report. >> > >> > You might want to start there by showing where it concludes that the >> > Bush didn't lie. >> > >> Perhaps you can show us where it concludes he did lie instead of your >> textbook LOL bullshit. > > I know that it didn't even examine the question of whether or not Bush > lied. > > I know that it was chaired by a Republican and a Democrat beholden to > the administration by virtue of his sitting on the Board of Trustees of > the MITRE Corporation which has revenues of more than a billion dollars. So you are saying that Silberman lied? You conspiracy theorists are too funny. Go with a guess and skip all the facts. |