From: Moderate on

"MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote in message
news:8aon1iFnk9U1(a)mid.individual.net...
>
> <bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message
> news:qs6e46hjfaq9m7upgm0ofm4eqhmrqunpip(a)4ax.com...
>> On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 11:07:24 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>><bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message
>>>news:v8jd46h1tk0ap2ckbe4dbfcrh8rtqa05fh(a)4ax.com...
>>>> On 21 Jul 2010 10:16:16 GMT, Moderate <nospam(a)nomail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>The Obama economy is much worse than the Bush economy.
>>>>
>>>> He's doing his best to stem the Bush economy free fall that got us
>>>> here.
>>>>
>>>If this is Obamas best, we are totally fucked. Obama has no clue
>>>whatsoever
>>>about the economy.
>>>
>> Right. Why the hell hasn't he called you to straighten things out?
>> Not.
>>
> He has the wonder boy Timmy Geithner for that. Then we have this idiot
> keeping an eye on the stimulus spending.
> http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/38292005

I wanted to see Rahmbo testify at Blago's trial.

http://dailycaller.com/2010/07/16/blago-trial-produces-no-bombshells-but-casts-doubt-on-obama-truthfulness/


From: William Clark on
In article <8aojjaF2atU1(a)mid.individual.net>,
"MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote:

> "William Clark" <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in message
> news:wclark2-37FA25.21090720072010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu...
> > In article <MPG.26b002fd77ab853398a140(a)news.giganews.com>,
> > BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote:
> >
> >> In article <wclark2-501CEE.17564620072010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-
> >> state.edu>, wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com says...
> >> > > > What in God's name are you talking about? "Embarrassing" has
> >> > > > nothing to
> >> > > > do with it - he's a poor candidate. Period. Something that you
> >> > > > could
> >> > > > never be man enough to admit about Eskimo Barbie, but that's the
> >> > > > difference between you wingnuts and those with an IQ.
> >> > >
> >> > > He is the choice of the Democrats in South Carolina to be their
> >> > > candidate for Senator in the general election. Good or poor candidate
> >> > > won't be determined until after the election.
> >> >
> >> > Yes, and Republicans in the same state elected Mark Sanford for their
> >> > Governor. Do you see a pattern here between South Carolinians and their
> >> > ability to handle elections like adults?
> >> >
> >>
> >> Now you are disparaging the entire state of South Carolina.
> >
> > Well, it does seem that they could do with adult supervision when it
> > comes to their politics.
>
> Same could be said about the voter fraud morons in Ohio.

Cite, please?
From: William Clark on
In article <alangbaker-81965C.08130821072010(a)news.shawcable.com>,
Alan Baker <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote:

> In article <MPG.26b0a6f71cd2a4a598a149(a)news.giganews.com>,
> BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote:
>
> > In article <alangbaker-DA11CF.22172320072010(a)news.shawcable.com>,
> > alangbaker(a)telus.net says...
> > > > > > The poor should be paying for their own health care just like they
> > > > > > pay
> > > > > > for their own food, cars, cell phone, plasma TVs, ....
> > > > >
> > > > > This fantasy "poor" you've invented is solely so you can abdicate
> > > > > your
> > > > > responsibilities as a human being.
> > > >
> > > > Call it whatever you want. I am not responsible for someone else's bad
> > > > choice just like I am not entitled to benefit from someone else's good
> > > > choices.
> > > >
> > > > If you want to talk about abdicating responsibilities as a human being
> > > > I
> > > > will assume that you have done just that due to the fact that you
> > > > haven't given all of your means above your basic needs away to the
> > > > poor.
> > >
> > > Nope. I recognize that we have a responsibility to help other people in
> > > need because it is the right thing to do. That doesn't mean "giving all
> > > of [one's] means above basic needs away".
> > >
> > > Look up "false dichotomy".
> > >
> >
> > Where does your responsibility come from, to help others.
>
> My sense of right and wrong. My status as a fellow human being. Personal
> integrity.
>
> Are all these things alien to you?

Clearly they are.
From: MNMikeW on

"Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> wrote in message
news:i27cir$vo9$1(a)speranza.aioe.org...
>
> "Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message
> news:alangbaker-351ABA.10151421072010(a)news.shawcable.com...
>> In article <8aon65FodgU1(a)mid.individual.net>,
>> "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote:
>>
>>> "Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message
>>> news:alangbaker-816E1E.09450721072010(a)news.shawcable.com...
>>> > In article <i277h0$n04$1(a)speranza.aioe.org>,
>>> > "Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> "Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message
>>> >> news:alangbaker-87D77B.08231221072010(a)news.shawcable.com...
>>> >> > In article
>>> >> > <1988069854301399651.689102nospam-nomail.com(a)news.suddenlink.net>,
>>> >> > Moderate <nospam(a)nomail.com> wrote:
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Wait: "We know Bush did not lie"????
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> > LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
>>> >>
>>> >> Well only those of us who have reviewed all of the Congressional
>>> >> investigations.
>>> >>
>>> >> You might want to start with the Silberman-Robb Report.
>>> >
>>> > You might want to start there by showing where it concludes that the
>>> > Bush didn't lie.
>>> >
>>> Perhaps you can show us where it concludes he did lie instead of your
>>> textbook LOL bullshit.
>>
>> I know that it didn't even examine the question of whether or not Bush
>> lied.
>>
>> I know that it was chaired by a Republican and a Democrat beholden to
>> the administration by virtue of his sitting on the Board of Trustees of
>> the MITRE Corporation which has revenues of more than a billion dollars.
>
> So you are saying that Silberman lied? You conspiracy theorists are too
> funny. Go with a guess and skip all the facts.
>
Bakers probably a Truther too.


From: MNMikeW on

"Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> wrote in message
news:i27d3t$1ci$1(a)speranza.aioe.org...
>
> "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote in message
> news:8aon1iFnk9U1(a)mid.individual.net...
>>
>> <bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message
>> news:qs6e46hjfaq9m7upgm0ofm4eqhmrqunpip(a)4ax.com...
>>> On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 11:07:24 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>><bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message
>>>>news:v8jd46h1tk0ap2ckbe4dbfcrh8rtqa05fh(a)4ax.com...
>>>>> On 21 Jul 2010 10:16:16 GMT, Moderate <nospam(a)nomail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>The Obama economy is much worse than the Bush economy.
>>>>>
>>>>> He's doing his best to stem the Bush economy free fall that got us
>>>>> here.
>>>>>
>>>>If this is Obamas best, we are totally fucked. Obama has no clue
>>>>whatsoever
>>>>about the economy.
>>>>
>>> Right. Why the hell hasn't he called you to straighten things out?
>>> Not.
>>>
>> He has the wonder boy Timmy Geithner for that. Then we have this idiot
>> keeping an eye on the stimulus spending.
>> http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/38292005
>
> I wanted to see Rahmbo testify at Blago's trial.
>
> http://dailycaller.com/2010/07/16/blago-trial-produces-no-bombshells-but-casts-doubt-on-obama-truthfulness/
>
Looks Like Blago is not taking the stand either now. Gee, wonder why.