From: Moderate on 21 Jul 2010 14:09 "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote in message news:8aon1iFnk9U1(a)mid.individual.net... > > <bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message > news:qs6e46hjfaq9m7upgm0ofm4eqhmrqunpip(a)4ax.com... >> On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 11:07:24 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> >> wrote: >> >>> >>><bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message >>>news:v8jd46h1tk0ap2ckbe4dbfcrh8rtqa05fh(a)4ax.com... >>>> On 21 Jul 2010 10:16:16 GMT, Moderate <nospam(a)nomail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>>The Obama economy is much worse than the Bush economy. >>>> >>>> He's doing his best to stem the Bush economy free fall that got us >>>> here. >>>> >>>If this is Obamas best, we are totally fucked. Obama has no clue >>>whatsoever >>>about the economy. >>> >> Right. Why the hell hasn't he called you to straighten things out? >> Not. >> > He has the wonder boy Timmy Geithner for that. Then we have this idiot > keeping an eye on the stimulus spending. > http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/38292005 I wanted to see Rahmbo testify at Blago's trial. http://dailycaller.com/2010/07/16/blago-trial-produces-no-bombshells-but-casts-doubt-on-obama-truthfulness/
From: William Clark on 21 Jul 2010 14:10 In article <8aojjaF2atU1(a)mid.individual.net>, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > "William Clark" <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in message > news:wclark2-37FA25.21090720072010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > > In article <MPG.26b002fd77ab853398a140(a)news.giganews.com>, > > BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: > > > >> In article <wclark2-501CEE.17564620072010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio- > >> state.edu>, wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com says... > >> > > > What in God's name are you talking about? "Embarrassing" has > >> > > > nothing to > >> > > > do with it - he's a poor candidate. Period. Something that you > >> > > > could > >> > > > never be man enough to admit about Eskimo Barbie, but that's the > >> > > > difference between you wingnuts and those with an IQ. > >> > > > >> > > He is the choice of the Democrats in South Carolina to be their > >> > > candidate for Senator in the general election. Good or poor candidate > >> > > won't be determined until after the election. > >> > > >> > Yes, and Republicans in the same state elected Mark Sanford for their > >> > Governor. Do you see a pattern here between South Carolinians and their > >> > ability to handle elections like adults? > >> > > >> > >> Now you are disparaging the entire state of South Carolina. > > > > Well, it does seem that they could do with adult supervision when it > > comes to their politics. > > Same could be said about the voter fraud morons in Ohio. Cite, please?
From: William Clark on 21 Jul 2010 14:15 In article <alangbaker-81965C.08130821072010(a)news.shawcable.com>, Alan Baker <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote: > In article <MPG.26b0a6f71cd2a4a598a149(a)news.giganews.com>, > BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: > > > In article <alangbaker-DA11CF.22172320072010(a)news.shawcable.com>, > > alangbaker(a)telus.net says... > > > > > > The poor should be paying for their own health care just like they > > > > > > pay > > > > > > for their own food, cars, cell phone, plasma TVs, .... > > > > > > > > > > This fantasy "poor" you've invented is solely so you can abdicate > > > > > your > > > > > responsibilities as a human being. > > > > > > > > Call it whatever you want. I am not responsible for someone else's bad > > > > choice just like I am not entitled to benefit from someone else's good > > > > choices. > > > > > > > > If you want to talk about abdicating responsibilities as a human being > > > > I > > > > will assume that you have done just that due to the fact that you > > > > haven't given all of your means above your basic needs away to the > > > > poor. > > > > > > Nope. I recognize that we have a responsibility to help other people in > > > need because it is the right thing to do. That doesn't mean "giving all > > > of [one's] means above basic needs away". > > > > > > Look up "false dichotomy". > > > > > > > Where does your responsibility come from, to help others. > > My sense of right and wrong. My status as a fellow human being. Personal > integrity. > > Are all these things alien to you? Clearly they are.
From: MNMikeW on 21 Jul 2010 14:35 "Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> wrote in message news:i27cir$vo9$1(a)speranza.aioe.org... > > "Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message > news:alangbaker-351ABA.10151421072010(a)news.shawcable.com... >> In article <8aon65FodgU1(a)mid.individual.net>, >> "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: >> >>> "Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message >>> news:alangbaker-816E1E.09450721072010(a)news.shawcable.com... >>> > In article <i277h0$n04$1(a)speranza.aioe.org>, >>> > "Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> wrote: >>> > >>> >> "Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message >>> >> news:alangbaker-87D77B.08231221072010(a)news.shawcable.com... >>> >> > In article >>> >> > <1988069854301399651.689102nospam-nomail.com(a)news.suddenlink.net>, >>> >> > Moderate <nospam(a)nomail.com> wrote: >>> >> > >>> >> > Wait: "We know Bush did not lie"???? >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL >>> >> >>> >> Well only those of us who have reviewed all of the Congressional >>> >> investigations. >>> >> >>> >> You might want to start with the Silberman-Robb Report. >>> > >>> > You might want to start there by showing where it concludes that the >>> > Bush didn't lie. >>> > >>> Perhaps you can show us where it concludes he did lie instead of your >>> textbook LOL bullshit. >> >> I know that it didn't even examine the question of whether or not Bush >> lied. >> >> I know that it was chaired by a Republican and a Democrat beholden to >> the administration by virtue of his sitting on the Board of Trustees of >> the MITRE Corporation which has revenues of more than a billion dollars. > > So you are saying that Silberman lied? You conspiracy theorists are too > funny. Go with a guess and skip all the facts. > Bakers probably a Truther too.
From: MNMikeW on 21 Jul 2010 14:36
"Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> wrote in message news:i27d3t$1ci$1(a)speranza.aioe.org... > > "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote in message > news:8aon1iFnk9U1(a)mid.individual.net... >> >> <bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message >> news:qs6e46hjfaq9m7upgm0ofm4eqhmrqunpip(a)4ax.com... >>> On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 11:07:24 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>><bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message >>>>news:v8jd46h1tk0ap2ckbe4dbfcrh8rtqa05fh(a)4ax.com... >>>>> On 21 Jul 2010 10:16:16 GMT, Moderate <nospam(a)nomail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>The Obama economy is much worse than the Bush economy. >>>>> >>>>> He's doing his best to stem the Bush economy free fall that got us >>>>> here. >>>>> >>>>If this is Obamas best, we are totally fucked. Obama has no clue >>>>whatsoever >>>>about the economy. >>>> >>> Right. Why the hell hasn't he called you to straighten things out? >>> Not. >>> >> He has the wonder boy Timmy Geithner for that. Then we have this idiot >> keeping an eye on the stimulus spending. >> http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/38292005 > > I wanted to see Rahmbo testify at Blago's trial. > > http://dailycaller.com/2010/07/16/blago-trial-produces-no-bombshells-but-casts-doubt-on-obama-truthfulness/ > Looks Like Blago is not taking the stand either now. Gee, wonder why. |