Support Sharon Angle
in [Golf]
|
From: William Clark on 21 Jul 2010 20:11 In article <0o0f461k573lo67683rg2d03n50vfiojjd(a)4ax.com>, bknight(a)conramp.net wrote: > On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 16:03:07 -0700 (PDT), dsc-ky > <Dudley.Cornman(a)eku.edu> wrote: > > >On Jul 21, 3:55�pm, "MNMikeW" <MNMiik...(a)aol.com> wrote: > >> <bkni...(a)conramp.net> wrote in message > > >> > Please point out my wild accusations of the Bush administration. > >> > That's just not going to happen. > >> > >> > BK > >> > >> Did I say it was you? > > > >No you didn't... so he deflected. > > > > I felt that it was implied. > > BK I think he just bagged that line of attack :-)
From: Carbon on 21 Jul 2010 20:28 On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 14:32:31 -0500, MNMikeW wrote: > <bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message > news:3pge4697ghf73ijekcs7qujposnfn3v992(a)4ax.com... > >> So there are areas in which you see Obama being reasonable? Hell, even >> I thought Bush made some reasonable moves, although I can't think of >> one now. > > I agree with Obama on only a couple things. Keeping Club Gitmo open. > Continuing the Patriot Act. http://projects.washingtonpost.com/top-secret-america/articles/a-hidden- world-growing-beyond-control/
From: Carbon on 21 Jul 2010 20:37 On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 14:35:06 -0500, bknight wrote: > On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 14:25:10 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> > wrote: >><bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message >>news:uage46dv0cv2op325d6fh7kaj6u2e312td(a)4ax.com... >>> On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 10:15:22 -0700 (PDT), dsc-ky >>> <Dudley.Cornman(a)eku.edu> wrote: >>> >>>> I agree with Mike... >>> >>> That makes you FOS too Dudley. Its silly to even suggest >>> corruption, but that often happens with non-thinkers whose party >>> isn't in office. >> >> Guess there were a LOT of non-thinkers in here a couple years ago >> then. >> > There is that in both parties. However, I don't recall anyone > accusing the Bush administration of corruption, just stupidity. I accused them of both.
From: Alan Baker on 21 Jul 2010 20:42 In article <i27cir$vo9$1(a)speranza.aioe.org>, "Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> wrote: > "Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message > news:alangbaker-351ABA.10151421072010(a)news.shawcable.com... > > In article <8aon65FodgU1(a)mid.individual.net>, > > "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > > > >> "Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message > >> news:alangbaker-816E1E.09450721072010(a)news.shawcable.com... > >> > In article <i277h0$n04$1(a)speranza.aioe.org>, > >> > "Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> wrote: > >> > > >> >> "Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message > >> >> news:alangbaker-87D77B.08231221072010(a)news.shawcable.com... > >> >> > In article > >> >> > <1988069854301399651.689102nospam-nomail.com(a)news.suddenlink.net>, > >> >> > Moderate <nospam(a)nomail.com> wrote: > >> >> > > >> >> > Wait: "We know Bush did not lie"???? > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL > >> >> > >> >> Well only those of us who have reviewed all of the Congressional > >> >> investigations. > >> >> > >> >> You might want to start with the Silberman-Robb Report. > >> > > >> > You might want to start there by showing where it concludes that the > >> > Bush didn't lie. > >> > > >> Perhaps you can show us where it concludes he did lie instead of your > >> textbook LOL bullshit. > > > > I know that it didn't even examine the question of whether or not Bush > > lied. > > > > I know that it was chaired by a Republican and a Democrat beholden to > > the administration by virtue of his sitting on the Board of Trustees of > > the MITRE Corporation which has revenues of more than a billion dollars. > > So you are saying that Silberman lied? I'm saying the report didn't even examine the question of lies. > You conspiracy theorists are too > funny. Go with a guess and skip all the facts. Quote some of these "facts"... -- Alan Baker Vancouver, British Columbia <http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg>
From: Carbon on 21 Jul 2010 20:42
On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 14:54:21 -0500, MNMikeW wrote: > <bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message > news:3tie469u2r8hi2bd957nnm6prq1vvjhb67(a)4ax.com... >> On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 14:25:10 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Guess there were a LOT of non-thinkers in here a couple years ago then. >>> >> There is that in both parties. However, I don't recall anyone accusing >> the Bush administration of corruption, just stupidity. > > I think Google could refresh your memory. Of course accusing the Obama > administration of stupidity, would be, gasp, racist. You mean Obama personally? You do not get to be a law professor if you're stupid. However, if your daddy's a senator, you sometimes do get to fly fighter jets. |