From: Billy on
In article <9b9f469d2ss4nvqtapfoaacfe692lum3u1(a)4ax.com>,
bknight(a)conramp.net wrote:

> On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 18:19:30 -0700 (PDT), dsc-ky
> <Dudley.Cornman(a)eku.edu> wrote:
>
> >On Jul 21, 7:33�pm, bkni...(a)conramp.net wrote:
> >> On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 16:01:35 -0700 (PDT), dsc-ky
> >>
> >> <Dudley.Corn...(a)eku.edu> wrote:
> >>
> >> >I don't doubt there was some corruption in Bush's administration
> >> >too... or any other for that matter. Has nothing to do do with my
> >> >party or which is in power. Wasn't Bush/Cheney accused of giving large
> >> >contracts to their buddies?
> >>
> >> � My position is that Obama himself, not someone in his
> >> administration, is not corrupt.
> >>
> >> I don't think Bush, himself, was corrupt. �
> >>
> >> I do think that Cheney is, and was.
> >>
> >> BK
> >
> >In that case, he surrounded himself with corruption... complicity.
>
> I really think that he was so unaware that he had no idea what they
> were doing. Cheney and company used him. I don't see Bush as a bad
> guy, just inept.
>
> BK

High praise indeed ;O)
--
- Billy
"Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the
merger of state and corporate power." - Benito Mussolini.
http://www.democracynow.org/2010/7/2/maude
http://www.democracynow.org/2010/6/28/naomi_klein_the_real_crime_scene
From: Moderate on
Alan Baker <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote:
> In article <i27cir$vo9$1(a)speranza.aioe.org>,
> "Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> wrote:
>
>> "Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message
>> news:alangbaker-351ABA.10151421072010(a)news.shawcable.com...
>>> In article <8aon65FodgU1(a)mid.individual.net>,
>>> "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> "Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message
>>>> news:alangbaker-816E1E.09450721072010(a)news.shawcable.com...
>>>>> In article <i277h0$n04$1(a)speranza.aioe.org>,
>>>>> "Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> "Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:alangbaker-87D77B.08231221072010(a)news.shawcable.com...
>>>>>>> In article
>>>>>>> <1988069854301399651.689102nospam-nomail.com(a)news.suddenlink.net>,
>>>>>>> Moderate <nospam(a)nomail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Wait: "We know Bush did not lie"????
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Well only those of us who have reviewed all of the Congressional
>>>>>> investigations.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You might want to start with the Silberman-Robb Report.
>>>>>
>>>>> You might want to start there by showing where it concludes that
> > > > > the
>>>>> Bush didn't lie.
>>>>>
>>>> Perhaps you can show us where it concludes he did lie instead of
> > > > your
>>>> textbook LOL bullshit.
>>>
>>> I know that it didn't even examine the question of whether or not
> > > Bush
>>> lied.
>>>
>>> I know that it was chaired by a Republican and a Democrat beholden
> > > to
>>> the administration by virtue of his sitting on the Board of Trustees
> > > of
>>> the MITRE Corporation which has revenues of more than a billion
> > > dollars.
>>
>> So you are saying that Silberman lied?
>
> I'm saying the report didn't even examine the question of lies.
>
>> You conspiracy theorists are too
>> funny. Go with a guess and skip all the facts.
>
> Quote some of these "facts"...

What lies? Quote the facts? Are you unable to read the report for
yourself?

You can lead a conspiracy theorist to water, but you can' stop them from
drinking the koolaid.
From: Moderate on
dsc-ky <Dudley.Cornman(a)eku.edu> wrote:
> On Jul 21, 2:51 pm, bkni...(a)conramp.net wrote:
>> On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 10:15:22 -0700 (PDT), dsc-ky
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> <Dudley.Corn...(a)eku.edu> wrote:
>>> On Jul 21, 1:02 pm, bkni...(a)conramp.net wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 11:49:14 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiik...(a)aol.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>
>>>>> "dsc-ky" <Dudley.Corn...(a)eku.edu> wrote in message
>>>>> news:39410c1e-6847-41aa-90e8-057d614201d1(a)q35g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...
>>
>>>>>>> You are projecting again. I have been critical of Palin as have
> > > > > > > other
>>>>>>> conservatives posting here.
>>
>>>>>> Only because she is a loser. If she wasn't, you'd be her main
> > > > > > champion.-
>>>>>> Hide quoted text -
>>
>>>>> If she weren't a "loser" as you put it, then what be wrong with
>>>>> championing her?
>>
>>>>> Bummer is a loser too... they made him pres for it.
>>
>>>>> -------------------------------------
>>
>>>>> Obama is nothing more than a Blagojevich clone. Spreading the
> > > > > corruption of
>>>>> Chicago politics nationwide.
>>
>>>> Mike, that is just plain bullshit and I'm surprised that you would
>>>> even go there. You know better.
>>
>>>> I know you don't like Obama, but accusing him of corruption is
> > > > below
>>>> you. I detested Bush but knew better than to throw out trash like
>>>> this about him.
>>
>>>> BK- Hide quoted text -
>>
>>>> - Show quoted text -
>>
>>> I agree with Mike...
>>
>> That makes you FOS too Dudley. Its silly to even suggest corruption,
>> but that often happens with non-thinkers whose party isn't in office.
>>
>> BK
>
> I don't doubt there was some corruption in Bush's administration
> too... or any other for that matter. Has nothing to do do with my
> party or which is in power. Wasn't Bush/Cheney accused of giving large
> contracts to their buddies?

They were accused of a lot more than that. The left is good.at making
accusations.
From: MNMikeW on

"Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
news:4c4792dd$0$12637$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com...
> On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 14:35:06 -0500, bknight wrote:
>> On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 14:25:10 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com>
>> wrote:
>>><bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message
>>>news:uage46dv0cv2op325d6fh7kaj6u2e312td(a)4ax.com...
>>>> On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 10:15:22 -0700 (PDT), dsc-ky
>>>> <Dudley.Cornman(a)eku.edu> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I agree with Mike...
>>>>
>>>> That makes you FOS too Dudley. Its silly to even suggest
>>>> corruption, but that often happens with non-thinkers whose party
>>>> isn't in office.
>>>
>>> Guess there were a LOT of non-thinkers in here a couple years ago
>>> then.
>>>
>> There is that in both parties. However, I don't recall anyone
>> accusing the Bush administration of corruption, just stupidity.
>
> I accused them of both.

You non-thinker you.


From: MNMikeW on

"Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
news:4c4793fd$0$5004$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com...
> On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 14:54:21 -0500, MNMikeW wrote:
>> <bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message
>> news:3tie469u2r8hi2bd957nnm6prq1vvjhb67(a)4ax.com...
>>> On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 14:25:10 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Guess there were a LOT of non-thinkers in here a couple years ago
> then.
>>>>
>>> There is that in both parties. However, I don't recall anyone accusing
>>> the Bush administration of corruption, just stupidity.
>>
>> I think Google could refresh your memory. Of course accusing the Obama
>> administration of stupidity, would be, gasp, racist.
>
> You mean Obama personally? You do not get to be a law professor if you're
> stupid. However, if your daddy's a senator, you sometimes do get to fly
> fighter jets.

You must have missed the administration part. Not surprising.