From: Billy on 22 Jul 2010 02:09 In article <9b9f469d2ss4nvqtapfoaacfe692lum3u1(a)4ax.com>, bknight(a)conramp.net wrote: > On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 18:19:30 -0700 (PDT), dsc-ky > <Dudley.Cornman(a)eku.edu> wrote: > > >On Jul 21, 7:33�pm, bkni...(a)conramp.net wrote: > >> On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 16:01:35 -0700 (PDT), dsc-ky > >> > >> <Dudley.Corn...(a)eku.edu> wrote: > >> > >> >I don't doubt there was some corruption in Bush's administration > >> >too... or any other for that matter. Has nothing to do do with my > >> >party or which is in power. Wasn't Bush/Cheney accused of giving large > >> >contracts to their buddies? > >> > >> � My position is that Obama himself, not someone in his > >> administration, is not corrupt. > >> > >> I don't think Bush, himself, was corrupt. � > >> > >> I do think that Cheney is, and was. > >> > >> BK > > > >In that case, he surrounded himself with corruption... complicity. > > I really think that he was so unaware that he had no idea what they > were doing. Cheney and company used him. I don't see Bush as a bad > guy, just inept. > > BK High praise indeed ;O) -- - Billy "Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power." - Benito Mussolini. http://www.democracynow.org/2010/7/2/maude http://www.democracynow.org/2010/6/28/naomi_klein_the_real_crime_scene
From: Moderate on 22 Jul 2010 07:05 Alan Baker <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote: > In article <i27cir$vo9$1(a)speranza.aioe.org>, > "Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> wrote: > >> "Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message >> news:alangbaker-351ABA.10151421072010(a)news.shawcable.com... >>> In article <8aon65FodgU1(a)mid.individual.net>, >>> "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: >>> >>>> "Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message >>>> news:alangbaker-816E1E.09450721072010(a)news.shawcable.com... >>>>> In article <i277h0$n04$1(a)speranza.aioe.org>, >>>>> "Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> "Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message >>>>>> news:alangbaker-87D77B.08231221072010(a)news.shawcable.com... >>>>>>> In article >>>>>>> <1988069854301399651.689102nospam-nomail.com(a)news.suddenlink.net>, >>>>>>> Moderate <nospam(a)nomail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Wait: "We know Bush did not lie"???? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL >>>>>> >>>>>> Well only those of us who have reviewed all of the Congressional >>>>>> investigations. >>>>>> >>>>>> You might want to start with the Silberman-Robb Report. >>>>> >>>>> You might want to start there by showing where it concludes that > > > > > the >>>>> Bush didn't lie. >>>>> >>>> Perhaps you can show us where it concludes he did lie instead of > > > > your >>>> textbook LOL bullshit. >>> >>> I know that it didn't even examine the question of whether or not > > > Bush >>> lied. >>> >>> I know that it was chaired by a Republican and a Democrat beholden > > > to >>> the administration by virtue of his sitting on the Board of Trustees > > > of >>> the MITRE Corporation which has revenues of more than a billion > > > dollars. >> >> So you are saying that Silberman lied? > > I'm saying the report didn't even examine the question of lies. > >> You conspiracy theorists are too >> funny. Go with a guess and skip all the facts. > > Quote some of these "facts"... What lies? Quote the facts? Are you unable to read the report for yourself? You can lead a conspiracy theorist to water, but you can' stop them from drinking the koolaid.
From: Moderate on 22 Jul 2010 07:05 dsc-ky <Dudley.Cornman(a)eku.edu> wrote: > On Jul 21, 2:51 pm, bkni...(a)conramp.net wrote: >> On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 10:15:22 -0700 (PDT), dsc-ky >> >> >> >> >> >> <Dudley.Corn...(a)eku.edu> wrote: >>> On Jul 21, 1:02 pm, bkni...(a)conramp.net wrote: >>>> On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 11:49:14 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiik...(a)aol.com> >>>> wrote: >> >>>>> "dsc-ky" <Dudley.Corn...(a)eku.edu> wrote in message >>>>> news:39410c1e-6847-41aa-90e8-057d614201d1(a)q35g2000yqn.googlegroups.com... >> >>>>>>> You are projecting again. I have been critical of Palin as have > > > > > > > other >>>>>>> conservatives posting here. >> >>>>>> Only because she is a loser. If she wasn't, you'd be her main > > > > > > champion.- >>>>>> Hide quoted text - >> >>>>> If she weren't a "loser" as you put it, then what be wrong with >>>>> championing her? >> >>>>> Bummer is a loser too... they made him pres for it. >> >>>>> ------------------------------------- >> >>>>> Obama is nothing more than a Blagojevich clone. Spreading the > > > > > corruption of >>>>> Chicago politics nationwide. >> >>>> Mike, that is just plain bullshit and I'm surprised that you would >>>> even go there. You know better. >> >>>> I know you don't like Obama, but accusing him of corruption is > > > > below >>>> you. I detested Bush but knew better than to throw out trash like >>>> this about him. >> >>>> BK- Hide quoted text - >> >>>> - Show quoted text - >> >>> I agree with Mike... >> >> That makes you FOS too Dudley. Its silly to even suggest corruption, >> but that often happens with non-thinkers whose party isn't in office. >> >> BK > > I don't doubt there was some corruption in Bush's administration > too... or any other for that matter. Has nothing to do do with my > party or which is in power. Wasn't Bush/Cheney accused of giving large > contracts to their buddies? They were accused of a lot more than that. The left is good.at making accusations.
From: MNMikeW on 22 Jul 2010 10:26 "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message news:4c4792dd$0$12637$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... > On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 14:35:06 -0500, bknight wrote: >> On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 14:25:10 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> >> wrote: >>><bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message >>>news:uage46dv0cv2op325d6fh7kaj6u2e312td(a)4ax.com... >>>> On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 10:15:22 -0700 (PDT), dsc-ky >>>> <Dudley.Cornman(a)eku.edu> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I agree with Mike... >>>> >>>> That makes you FOS too Dudley. Its silly to even suggest >>>> corruption, but that often happens with non-thinkers whose party >>>> isn't in office. >>> >>> Guess there were a LOT of non-thinkers in here a couple years ago >>> then. >>> >> There is that in both parties. However, I don't recall anyone >> accusing the Bush administration of corruption, just stupidity. > > I accused them of both. You non-thinker you.
From: MNMikeW on 22 Jul 2010 10:28
"Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message news:4c4793fd$0$5004$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... > On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 14:54:21 -0500, MNMikeW wrote: >> <bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message >> news:3tie469u2r8hi2bd957nnm6prq1vvjhb67(a)4ax.com... >>> On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 14:25:10 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Guess there were a LOT of non-thinkers in here a couple years ago > then. >>>> >>> There is that in both parties. However, I don't recall anyone accusing >>> the Bush administration of corruption, just stupidity. >> >> I think Google could refresh your memory. Of course accusing the Obama >> administration of stupidity, would be, gasp, racist. > > You mean Obama personally? You do not get to be a law professor if you're > stupid. However, if your daddy's a senator, you sometimes do get to fly > fighter jets. You must have missed the administration part. Not surprising. |