Support Sharon Angle
in [Golf]
|
From: dsc-ky on 22 Jul 2010 12:27 On Jul 21, 9:58 pm, bkni...(a)conramp.net wrote: > On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 18:19:30 -0700 (PDT), dsc-ky > > > > > > <Dudley.Corn...(a)eku.edu> wrote: > >On Jul 21, 7:33 pm, bkni...(a)conramp.net wrote: > >> On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 16:01:35 -0700 (PDT), dsc-ky > > >> <Dudley.Corn...(a)eku.edu> wrote: > > >> >I don't doubt there was some corruption in Bush's administration > >> >too... or any other for that matter. Has nothing to do do with my > >> >party or which is in power. Wasn't Bush/Cheney accused of giving large > >> >contracts to their buddies? > > >> My position is that Obama himself, not someone in his > >> administration, is not corrupt. > > >> I don't think Bush, himself, was corrupt. > > >> I do think that Cheney is, and was. > > >> BK > > >In that case, he surrounded himself with corruption... complicity. > > I really think that he was so unaware that he had no idea what they > were doing. Cheney and company used him. I don't see Bush as a bad > guy, just inept. > > BK- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - I meant Obamma (moreso than Bush).
From: dsc-ky on 22 Jul 2010 12:35 > Then it went to WMDs, > which we all know now to be untrue. Well, we sure didn't find any... whether that is conclusive proof or not that they never existed? I don't know? SH was a very bad guy... should have been killed when we were there in 91...
From: bknight on 22 Jul 2010 13:16 On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 09:27:34 -0700 (PDT), dsc-ky <Dudley.Cornman(a)eku.edu> wrote: >On Jul 21, 9:58�pm, bkni...(a)conramp.net wrote: >> On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 18:19:30 -0700 (PDT), dsc-ky >> >> >> <Dudley.Corn...(a)eku.edu> wrote: >> >On Jul 21, 7:33�pm, bkni...(a)conramp.net wrote: >> >> On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 16:01:35 -0700 (PDT), dsc-ky >> >> >> <Dudley.Corn...(a)eku.edu> wrote: >> >> >> >I don't doubt there was some corruption in Bush's administration >> >> >too... or any other for that matter. Has nothing to do do with my >> >> >party or which is in power. Wasn't Bush/Cheney accused of giving large >> >> >contracts to their buddies? >> >> >> � My position is that Obama himself, not someone in his >> >> administration, is not corrupt. >> >> >> I don't think Bush, himself, was corrupt. � >> >> >> I do think that Cheney is, and was. >> >> >> BK >> >> >In that case, he surrounded himself with corruption... complicity. >> >> I really think that he was so unaware that he had no idea what they >> were doing. Cheney and company used him. �I don't see Bush as a bad >> guy, just inept. > >I meant Obamma (moreso than Bush). That doesn't make sense Dudley. In what case? BK
From: bknight on 22 Jul 2010 13:18 On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 09:35:32 -0700 (PDT), dsc-ky <Dudley.Cornman(a)eku.edu> wrote: >> �Then it went to WMDs, >> which we all know now to be untrue. > >Well, we sure didn't find any... whether that is conclusive proof or >not that they never existed? I don't know? SH was a very bad guy... >should have been killed when we were there in 91... He was our buddy then. We have a history of backing bad guys, then turning on them. BK
From: William Clark on 22 Jul 2010 13:48
In article <8ar2v3F1shU1(a)mid.individual.net>, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > "William Clark" <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in message > news:wclark2-EDDB26.20530921072010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > > In article <4c4793fd$0$5004$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>, > > Carbon <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote: > > > >> On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 14:54:21 -0500, MNMikeW wrote: > >> > <bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message > >> > news:3tie469u2r8hi2bd957nnm6prq1vvjhb67(a)4ax.com... > >> >> On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 14:25:10 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> > >> >> wrote: > >> >> > >> >>> Guess there were a LOT of non-thinkers in here a couple years ago > >> then. > >> >>> > >> >> There is that in both parties. However, I don't recall anyone > >> >> accusing > >> >> the Bush administration of corruption, just stupidity. > >> > > >> > I think Google could refresh your memory. Of course accusing the Obama > >> > administration of stupidity, would be, gasp, racist. > >> > >> You mean Obama personally? You do not get to be a law professor if you're > >> stupid. However, if your daddy's a senator, you sometimes do get to fly > >> fighter jets. > > > > As long as it isn't anywhere near the enemy. > > How many jets did Obama fly? I know his dog just flew on his own private > Gulfstream. He didn't have to - we had no conscriptable war going on when he was that age, or hadn't you noticed? It is also true that he was never declared unfit to fly because of continuing, unexcused, absences. |