Support Sharon Angle
in [Golf]
|
From: William Clark on 22 Jul 2010 13:52 In article <alangbaker-34B705.09242522072010(a)news.shawcable.com>, Alan Baker <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote: > In article <8ar4bpFansU1(a)mid.individual.net>, > "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > > > "William Clark" <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in message > > news:wclark2-504ECB.20542221072010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > > > In article <alangbaker-2DA1B4.17464721072010(a)news.shawcable.com>, > > > Alan Baker <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote: > > > > > >> In article <8aot2iFtihU1(a)mid.individual.net>, > > >> "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > > >> > > >> > "William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in > > >> > message > > >> > news:clark-C91EB8.14105621072010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > > >> > > In article <8aojjaF2atU1(a)mid.individual.net>, > > >> > > "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > > >> > > > > >> > >> "William Clark" <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in message > > >> > >> news:wclark2-37FA25.21090720072010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu.. > > >> > >> . > > >> > >> > In article <MPG.26b002fd77ab853398a140(a)news.giganews.com>, > > >> > >> > BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> >> In article <wclark2-501CEE.17564620072010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio- > > >> > >> >> state.edu>, wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com says... > > >> > >> >> > > > What in God's name are you talking about? "Embarrassing" > > >> > >> >> > > > has > > >> > >> >> > > > nothing to > > >> > >> >> > > > do with it - he's a poor candidate. Period. Something that > > >> > >> >> > > > you > > >> > >> >> > > > could > > >> > >> >> > > > never be man enough to admit about Eskimo Barbie, but > > >> > >> >> > > > that's > > >> > >> >> > > > the > > >> > >> >> > > > difference between you wingnuts and those with an IQ. > > >> > >> >> > > > > >> > >> >> > > He is the choice of the Democrats in South Carolina to be > > >> > >> >> > > their > > >> > >> >> > > candidate for Senator in the general election. Good or poor > > >> > >> >> > > candidate > > >> > >> >> > > won't be determined until after the election. > > >> > >> >> > > > >> > >> >> > Yes, and Republicans in the same state elected Mark Sanford > > >> > >> >> > for > > >> > >> >> > their > > >> > >> >> > Governor. Do you see a pattern here between South Carolinians > > >> > >> >> > and > > >> > >> >> > their > > >> > >> >> > ability to handle elections like adults? > > >> > >> >> > > > >> > >> >> > > >> > >> >> Now you are disparaging the entire state of South Carolina. > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > Well, it does seem that they could do with adult supervision when > > >> > >> > it > > >> > >> > comes to their politics. > > >> > >> > > >> > >> Same could be said about the voter fraud morons in Ohio. > > >> > > > > >> > > Cite, please? > > >> > > > >> > We've been over this before Billy boy. Do your own research for once > > >> > in > > >> > your > > >> > life. > > >> > > >> Run away, Mike! > > > > > > Indeed - he has no cite; it's just empty blather. > > > > > > Caught with the old trousers down, I'm afraid, Mikey! > > > > http://www.upi.com/Top_News/2007/11/05/Probation-given-in-recount-rigging-ca > > se > > /UPI-76281194312570/ > > > > Googling Ohio voter fraud only returns 127,000 hits. > > Googling "Bush lied" returns 3,600,000 hits. What does that prove? "GoP voter fraud" gives you 216,000 hits, and "Republican voter fraud" returns 2,120,000. So the Republicans are almost twenty times as bad as the Democrats. Oh, dear :-)
From: John B. on 22 Jul 2010 14:06 On Jul 21, 7:20 am, BAR <sc...(a)you.com> wrote: > In article <01hc46pe0d9drkbp8su7qpdcarvkhil...(a)4ax.com>, > how...(a)brazee.net says... > > > > > On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 17:18:46 -0700 (PDT), "John B." > > <johnb...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> So you don't know any poor people? You haven't ever seen a person paying > > >> for groceries with food stamps and talking on their cell phone? Never seen > > >> a poor person play the lottery every week, smoke, drink, drug, drive or > > >> watch cable TV? > > > >Cell phones are cheaper than land-line phones. How bad off does a > > >person have to be to earn your appellation as "poor?" > > > Too poor to keep the tools needed to find a job???? > > What did people do before cell phones were invented? I assume nobody > ever got a job. Oh, wait a minute, I got several jobs by using a land- > line phone. Besides when hiring a person for an unskillied labor > position I don't expect that he be available 24 x 7 on his cell phone. > > And, with my job my cell phone is provided by my employer so that my > employer can contact me 24 x 7. If my employer did not provide me with > the cell phone he would be leaving messages on my answering machine at > home. The world has changed. But in your view, poor people shouldn't try to take advantage of the changes that might help them find work and make their lives better.
From: John B. on 22 Jul 2010 14:06 On Jul 21, 7:41 am, BAR <sc...(a)you.com> wrote: > In article <alangbaker-DA11CF.22172320072...(a)news.shawcable.com>, > alangba...(a)telus.net says... > > > > > > > > > > The poor should be paying for their own health care just like they pay > > > > > for their own food, cars, cell phone, plasma TVs, .... > > > > > This fantasy "poor" you've invented is solely so you can abdicate your > > > > responsibilities as a human being. > > > > Call it whatever you want. I am not responsible for someone else's bad > > > choice just like I am not entitled to benefit from someone else's good > > > choices. > > > > If you want to talk about abdicating responsibilities as a human being I > > > will assume that you have done just that due to the fact that you > > > haven't given all of your means above your basic needs away to the poor. > > > Nope. I recognize that we have a responsibility to help other people in > > need because it is the right thing to do. That doesn't mean "giving all > > of [one's] means above basic needs away". > > > Look up "false dichotomy". > > Where does your responsibility come from, to help others. Mine comes from God.
From: John B. on 22 Jul 2010 14:11 On Jul 21, 12:07 pm, "MNMikeW" <MNMiik...(a)aol.com> wrote: > <bkni...(a)conramp.net> wrote in message > > news:v8jd46h1tk0ap2ckbe4dbfcrh8rtqa05fh(a)4ax.com...> On 21 Jul 2010 10:16:16 GMT, Moderate <nos...(a)nomail.com> wrote: > > >>The Obama economy is much worse than the Bush economy. > > > He's doing his best to stem the Bush economy free fall that got us > > here. > > If this is Obamas best, we are totally fucked. Obama has no clue whatsoever > about the economy. Unlike those brilliant economists McCain and Palin.
From: John B. on 22 Jul 2010 14:14
On Jul 21, 2:36 pm, "MNMikeW" <MNMiik...(a)aol.com> wrote: > "Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> wrote in message > > news:i27d3t$1ci$1(a)speranza.aioe.org... > > > > > > > "MNMikeW" <MNMiik...(a)aol.com> wrote in message > >news:8aon1iFnk9U1(a)mid.individual.net... > > >> <bkni...(a)conramp.net> wrote in message > >>news:qs6e46hjfaq9m7upgm0ofm4eqhmrqunpip(a)4ax.com... > >>> On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 11:07:24 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiik...(a)aol.com> > >>> wrote: > > >>>><bkni...(a)conramp.net> wrote in message > >>>>news:v8jd46h1tk0ap2ckbe4dbfcrh8rtqa05fh(a)4ax.com... > >>>>> On 21 Jul 2010 10:16:16 GMT, Moderate <nos...(a)nomail.com> wrote: > > >>>>>>The Obama economy is much worse than the Bush economy. > > >>>>> He's doing his best to stem the Bush economy free fall that got us > >>>>> here. > > >>>>If this is Obamas best, we are totally fucked. Obama has no clue > >>>>whatsoever > >>>>about the economy. > > >>> Right. Why the hell hasn't he called you to straighten things out? > >>> Not. > > >> He has the wonder boy Timmy Geithner for that. Then we have this idiot > >> keeping an eye on the stimulus spending. > >>http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/38292005 > > > I wanted to see Rahmbo testify at Blago's trial. > > >http://dailycaller.com/2010/07/16/blago-trial-produces-no-bombshells-... > > Looks Like Blago is not taking the stand either now. Gee, wonder why. Defendants rarely do. |