From: MNMikeW on

<bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message
news:o9vg46p7ua1gqs2ei5gih8p7sbkjntsrhn(a)4ax.com...
> On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 09:35:32 -0700 (PDT), dsc-ky
> <Dudley.Cornman(a)eku.edu> wrote:
>
>>> Then it went to WMDs,
>>> which we all know now to be untrue.
>>
>>Well, we sure didn't find any... whether that is conclusive proof or
>>not that they never existed? I don't know? SH was a very bad guy...
>>should have been killed when we were there in 91...
>
> He was our buddy then. We have a history of backing bad guys, then
> turning on them.
>
> BK

I think it's more of good guys turning bad.


From: MNMikeW on

"William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in message
news:clark-60A856.13525822072010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu...
> In article <alangbaker-34B705.09242522072010(a)news.shawcable.com>,
> Alan Baker <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote:
>
>> In article <8ar4bpFansU1(a)mid.individual.net>,
>> "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote:
>>
>> > "William Clark" <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in message
>> > news:wclark2-504ECB.20542221072010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu...
>> > > In article <alangbaker-2DA1B4.17464721072010(a)news.shawcable.com>,
>> > > Alan Baker <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> In article <8aot2iFtihU1(a)mid.individual.net>,
>> > >> "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >> > "William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in
>> > >> > message
>> > >> > news:clark-C91EB8.14105621072010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu...
>> > >> > > In article <8aojjaF2atU1(a)mid.individual.net>,
>> > >> > > "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote:
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > >> "William Clark" <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in
>> > >> > >> message
>> > >> > >> news:wclark2-37FA25.21090720072010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu..
>> > >> > >> .
>> > >> > >> > In article <MPG.26b002fd77ab853398a140(a)news.giganews.com>,
>> > >> > >> > BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote:
>> > >> > >> >
>> > >> > >> >> In article
>> > >> > >> >> <wclark2-501CEE.17564620072010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-
>> > >> > >> >> state.edu>, wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com says...
>> > >> > >> >> > > > What in God's name are you talking about?
>> > >> > >> >> > > > "Embarrassing"
>> > >> > >> >> > > > has
>> > >> > >> >> > > > nothing to
>> > >> > >> >> > > > do with it - he's a poor candidate. Period. Something
>> > >> > >> >> > > > that
>> > >> > >> >> > > > you
>> > >> > >> >> > > > could
>> > >> > >> >> > > > never be man enough to admit about Eskimo Barbie, but
>> > >> > >> >> > > > that's
>> > >> > >> >> > > > the
>> > >> > >> >> > > > difference between you wingnuts and those with an IQ.
>> > >> > >> >> > >
>> > >> > >> >> > > He is the choice of the Democrats in South Carolina to
>> > >> > >> >> > > be
>> > >> > >> >> > > their
>> > >> > >> >> > > candidate for Senator in the general election. Good or
>> > >> > >> >> > > poor
>> > >> > >> >> > > candidate
>> > >> > >> >> > > won't be determined until after the election.
>> > >> > >> >> >
>> > >> > >> >> > Yes, and Republicans in the same state elected Mark
>> > >> > >> >> > Sanford
>> > >> > >> >> > for
>> > >> > >> >> > their
>> > >> > >> >> > Governor. Do you see a pattern here between South
>> > >> > >> >> > Carolinians
>> > >> > >> >> > and
>> > >> > >> >> > their
>> > >> > >> >> > ability to handle elections like adults?
>> > >> > >> >> >
>> > >> > >> >>
>> > >> > >> >> Now you are disparaging the entire state of South Carolina.
>> > >> > >> >
>> > >> > >> > Well, it does seem that they could do with adult supervision
>> > >> > >> > when
>> > >> > >> > it
>> > >> > >> > comes to their politics.
>> > >> > >>
>> > >> > >> Same could be said about the voter fraud morons in Ohio.
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > Cite, please?
>> > >> >
>> > >> > We've been over this before Billy boy. Do your own research for
>> > >> > once
>> > >> > in
>> > >> > your
>> > >> > life.
>> > >>
>> > >> Run away, Mike!
>> > >
>> > > Indeed - he has no cite; it's just empty blather.
>> > >
>> > > Caught with the old trousers down, I'm afraid, Mikey!
>> >
>> > http://www.upi.com/Top_News/2007/11/05/Probation-given-in-recount-rigging-ca
>> > se
>> > /UPI-76281194312570/
>> >
>> > Googling Ohio voter fraud only returns 127,000 hits.
>>
>> Googling "Bush lied" returns 3,600,000 hits. What does that prove?
>
> "GoP voter fraud" gives you 216,000 hits, and "Republican voter fraud"
> returns 2,120,000. So the Republicans are almost twenty times as bad as
> the Democrats. Oh, dear :-)

No, it only shows the moonbats like to type.


From: MNMikeW on

"John B." <johnb505(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
news:431708b5-f9ff-49d1-ab14-2b3c84176568(a)w30g2000yqw.googlegroups.com...
On Jul 21, 12:07 pm, "MNMikeW" <MNMiik...(a)aol.com> wrote:
> <bkni...(a)conramp.net> wrote in message
>
> news:v8jd46h1tk0ap2ckbe4dbfcrh8rtqa05fh(a)4ax.com...> On 21 Jul 2010
> 10:16:16 GMT, Moderate <nos...(a)nomail.com> wrote:
>
> >>The Obama economy is much worse than the Bush economy.
>
> > He's doing his best to stem the Bush economy free fall that got us
> > here.
>
> If this is Obamas best, we are totally fucked. Obama has no clue
> whatsoever
> about the economy.

Unlike those brilliant economists McCain and Palin.

=============

I'm pretty sure McCain would have spent far less tha Obama has. Though with
McCain being a RINO you never know.


From: MNMikeW on

"John B." <johnb505(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
news:64c35795-e98a-4933-8a7d-a9c5dc073d7a(a)e5g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...
On Jul 21, 2:36 pm, "MNMikeW" <MNMiik...(a)aol.com> wrote:
> "Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:i27d3t$1ci$1(a)speranza.aioe.org...
>
>
>
>
>
> > "MNMikeW" <MNMiik...(a)aol.com> wrote in message
> >news:8aon1iFnk9U1(a)mid.individual.net...
>
> >> <bkni...(a)conramp.net> wrote in message
> >>news:qs6e46hjfaq9m7upgm0ofm4eqhmrqunpip(a)4ax.com...
> >>> On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 11:07:24 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiik...(a)aol.com>
> >>> wrote:
>
> >>>><bkni...(a)conramp.net> wrote in message
> >>>>news:v8jd46h1tk0ap2ckbe4dbfcrh8rtqa05fh(a)4ax.com...
> >>>>> On 21 Jul 2010 10:16:16 GMT, Moderate <nos...(a)nomail.com> wrote:
>
> >>>>>>The Obama economy is much worse than the Bush economy.
>
> >>>>> He's doing his best to stem the Bush economy free fall that got us
> >>>>> here.
>
> >>>>If this is Obamas best, we are totally fucked. Obama has no clue
> >>>>whatsoever
> >>>>about the economy.
>
> >>> Right. Why the hell hasn't he called you to straighten things out?
> >>> Not.
>
> >> He has the wonder boy Timmy Geithner for that. Then we have this idiot
> >> keeping an eye on the stimulus spending.
> >>http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/38292005
>
> > I wanted to see Rahmbo testify at Blago's trial.
>
> >http://dailycaller.com/2010/07/16/blago-trial-produces-no-bombshells-...
>
> Looks Like Blago is not taking the stand either now. Gee, wonder why.

Defendants rarely do.

=========================

True. But he was going to until the last minute. Probably the best decision
he ever made.


From: Alan Baker on
In article <8argppFns7U1(a)mid.individual.net>,
"MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote:

> <bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message
> news:o9vg46p7ua1gqs2ei5gih8p7sbkjntsrhn(a)4ax.com...
> > On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 09:35:32 -0700 (PDT), dsc-ky
> > <Dudley.Cornman(a)eku.edu> wrote:
> >
> >>> Then it went to WMDs,
> >>> which we all know now to be untrue.
> >>
> >>Well, we sure didn't find any... whether that is conclusive proof or
> >>not that they never existed? I don't know? SH was a very bad guy...
> >>should have been killed when we were there in 91...
> >
> > He was our buddy then. We have a history of backing bad guys, then
> > turning on them.
> >
> > BK
>
> I think it's more of good guys turning bad.

There's absolutely no "though" in that conclusion.

The U.S. knows who it's getting into bed with; it just chooses to ignore
it.

--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia
<http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg>