From: MNMikeW on 22 Jul 2010 14:26 <bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message news:o9vg46p7ua1gqs2ei5gih8p7sbkjntsrhn(a)4ax.com... > On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 09:35:32 -0700 (PDT), dsc-ky > <Dudley.Cornman(a)eku.edu> wrote: > >>> Then it went to WMDs, >>> which we all know now to be untrue. >> >>Well, we sure didn't find any... whether that is conclusive proof or >>not that they never existed? I don't know? SH was a very bad guy... >>should have been killed when we were there in 91... > > He was our buddy then. We have a history of backing bad guys, then > turning on them. > > BK I think it's more of good guys turning bad.
From: MNMikeW on 22 Jul 2010 14:31 "William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in message news:clark-60A856.13525822072010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > In article <alangbaker-34B705.09242522072010(a)news.shawcable.com>, > Alan Baker <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote: > >> In article <8ar4bpFansU1(a)mid.individual.net>, >> "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: >> >> > "William Clark" <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in message >> > news:wclark2-504ECB.20542221072010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... >> > > In article <alangbaker-2DA1B4.17464721072010(a)news.shawcable.com>, >> > > Alan Baker <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote: >> > > >> > >> In article <8aot2iFtihU1(a)mid.individual.net>, >> > >> "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: >> > >> >> > >> > "William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in >> > >> > message >> > >> > news:clark-C91EB8.14105621072010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... >> > >> > > In article <8aojjaF2atU1(a)mid.individual.net>, >> > >> > > "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> "William Clark" <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in >> > >> > >> message >> > >> > >> news:wclark2-37FA25.21090720072010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu.. >> > >> > >> . >> > >> > >> > In article <MPG.26b002fd77ab853398a140(a)news.giganews.com>, >> > >> > >> > BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> >> In article >> > >> > >> >> <wclark2-501CEE.17564620072010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio- >> > >> > >> >> state.edu>, wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com says... >> > >> > >> >> > > > What in God's name are you talking about? >> > >> > >> >> > > > "Embarrassing" >> > >> > >> >> > > > has >> > >> > >> >> > > > nothing to >> > >> > >> >> > > > do with it - he's a poor candidate. Period. Something >> > >> > >> >> > > > that >> > >> > >> >> > > > you >> > >> > >> >> > > > could >> > >> > >> >> > > > never be man enough to admit about Eskimo Barbie, but >> > >> > >> >> > > > that's >> > >> > >> >> > > > the >> > >> > >> >> > > > difference between you wingnuts and those with an IQ. >> > >> > >> >> > > >> > >> > >> >> > > He is the choice of the Democrats in South Carolina to >> > >> > >> >> > > be >> > >> > >> >> > > their >> > >> > >> >> > > candidate for Senator in the general election. Good or >> > >> > >> >> > > poor >> > >> > >> >> > > candidate >> > >> > >> >> > > won't be determined until after the election. >> > >> > >> >> > >> > >> > >> >> > Yes, and Republicans in the same state elected Mark >> > >> > >> >> > Sanford >> > >> > >> >> > for >> > >> > >> >> > their >> > >> > >> >> > Governor. Do you see a pattern here between South >> > >> > >> >> > Carolinians >> > >> > >> >> > and >> > >> > >> >> > their >> > >> > >> >> > ability to handle elections like adults? >> > >> > >> >> > >> > >> > >> >> >> > >> > >> >> Now you are disparaging the entire state of South Carolina. >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > Well, it does seem that they could do with adult supervision >> > >> > >> > when >> > >> > >> > it >> > >> > >> > comes to their politics. >> > >> > >> >> > >> > >> Same could be said about the voter fraud morons in Ohio. >> > >> > > >> > >> > > Cite, please? >> > >> > >> > >> > We've been over this before Billy boy. Do your own research for >> > >> > once >> > >> > in >> > >> > your >> > >> > life. >> > >> >> > >> Run away, Mike! >> > > >> > > Indeed - he has no cite; it's just empty blather. >> > > >> > > Caught with the old trousers down, I'm afraid, Mikey! >> > >> > http://www.upi.com/Top_News/2007/11/05/Probation-given-in-recount-rigging-ca >> > se >> > /UPI-76281194312570/ >> > >> > Googling Ohio voter fraud only returns 127,000 hits. >> >> Googling "Bush lied" returns 3,600,000 hits. What does that prove? > > "GoP voter fraud" gives you 216,000 hits, and "Republican voter fraud" > returns 2,120,000. So the Republicans are almost twenty times as bad as > the Democrats. Oh, dear :-) No, it only shows the moonbats like to type.
From: MNMikeW on 22 Jul 2010 14:33 "John B." <johnb505(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:431708b5-f9ff-49d1-ab14-2b3c84176568(a)w30g2000yqw.googlegroups.com... On Jul 21, 12:07 pm, "MNMikeW" <MNMiik...(a)aol.com> wrote: > <bkni...(a)conramp.net> wrote in message > > news:v8jd46h1tk0ap2ckbe4dbfcrh8rtqa05fh(a)4ax.com...> On 21 Jul 2010 > 10:16:16 GMT, Moderate <nos...(a)nomail.com> wrote: > > >>The Obama economy is much worse than the Bush economy. > > > He's doing his best to stem the Bush economy free fall that got us > > here. > > If this is Obamas best, we are totally fucked. Obama has no clue > whatsoever > about the economy. Unlike those brilliant economists McCain and Palin. ============= I'm pretty sure McCain would have spent far less tha Obama has. Though with McCain being a RINO you never know.
From: MNMikeW on 22 Jul 2010 14:34 "John B." <johnb505(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:64c35795-e98a-4933-8a7d-a9c5dc073d7a(a)e5g2000yqn.googlegroups.com... On Jul 21, 2:36 pm, "MNMikeW" <MNMiik...(a)aol.com> wrote: > "Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> wrote in message > > news:i27d3t$1ci$1(a)speranza.aioe.org... > > > > > > > "MNMikeW" <MNMiik...(a)aol.com> wrote in message > >news:8aon1iFnk9U1(a)mid.individual.net... > > >> <bkni...(a)conramp.net> wrote in message > >>news:qs6e46hjfaq9m7upgm0ofm4eqhmrqunpip(a)4ax.com... > >>> On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 11:07:24 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiik...(a)aol.com> > >>> wrote: > > >>>><bkni...(a)conramp.net> wrote in message > >>>>news:v8jd46h1tk0ap2ckbe4dbfcrh8rtqa05fh(a)4ax.com... > >>>>> On 21 Jul 2010 10:16:16 GMT, Moderate <nos...(a)nomail.com> wrote: > > >>>>>>The Obama economy is much worse than the Bush economy. > > >>>>> He's doing his best to stem the Bush economy free fall that got us > >>>>> here. > > >>>>If this is Obamas best, we are totally fucked. Obama has no clue > >>>>whatsoever > >>>>about the economy. > > >>> Right. Why the hell hasn't he called you to straighten things out? > >>> Not. > > >> He has the wonder boy Timmy Geithner for that. Then we have this idiot > >> keeping an eye on the stimulus spending. > >>http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/38292005 > > > I wanted to see Rahmbo testify at Blago's trial. > > >http://dailycaller.com/2010/07/16/blago-trial-produces-no-bombshells-... > > Looks Like Blago is not taking the stand either now. Gee, wonder why. Defendants rarely do. ========================= True. But he was going to until the last minute. Probably the best decision he ever made.
From: Alan Baker on 22 Jul 2010 14:37
In article <8argppFns7U1(a)mid.individual.net>, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > <bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message > news:o9vg46p7ua1gqs2ei5gih8p7sbkjntsrhn(a)4ax.com... > > On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 09:35:32 -0700 (PDT), dsc-ky > > <Dudley.Cornman(a)eku.edu> wrote: > > > >>> Then it went to WMDs, > >>> which we all know now to be untrue. > >> > >>Well, we sure didn't find any... whether that is conclusive proof or > >>not that they never existed? I don't know? SH was a very bad guy... > >>should have been killed when we were there in 91... > > > > He was our buddy then. We have a history of backing bad guys, then > > turning on them. > > > > BK > > I think it's more of good guys turning bad. There's absolutely no "though" in that conclusion. The U.S. knows who it's getting into bed with; it just chooses to ignore it. -- Alan Baker Vancouver, British Columbia <http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg> |