Support Sharon Angle
in [Golf]
|
From: Alan Baker on 22 Jul 2010 14:37 In article <8arh3eFpobU2(a)mid.individual.net>, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > "William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in message > news:clark-60A856.13525822072010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > > In article <alangbaker-34B705.09242522072010(a)news.shawcable.com>, > > Alan Baker <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote: > > > >> In article <8ar4bpFansU1(a)mid.individual.net>, > >> "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > >> > >> > "William Clark" <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in message > >> > news:wclark2-504ECB.20542221072010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > >> > > In article <alangbaker-2DA1B4.17464721072010(a)news.shawcable.com>, > >> > > Alan Baker <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote: > >> > > > >> > >> In article <8aot2iFtihU1(a)mid.individual.net>, > >> > >> "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> > "William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in > >> > >> > message > >> > >> > news:clark-C91EB8.14105621072010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > >> > >> > > In article <8aojjaF2atU1(a)mid.individual.net>, > >> > >> > > "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > >> "William Clark" <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in > >> > >> > >> message > >> > >> > >> news:wclark2-37FA25.21090720072010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.ed > >> > >> > >> u.. > >> > >> > >> . > >> > >> > >> > In article <MPG.26b002fd77ab853398a140(a)news.giganews.com>, > >> > >> > >> > BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: > >> > >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> >> In article > >> > >> > >> >> <wclark2-501CEE.17564620072010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio- > >> > >> > >> >> state.edu>, wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com says... > >> > >> > >> >> > > > What in God's name are you talking about? > >> > >> > >> >> > > > "Embarrassing" > >> > >> > >> >> > > > has > >> > >> > >> >> > > > nothing to > >> > >> > >> >> > > > do with it - he's a poor candidate. Period. Something > >> > >> > >> >> > > > that > >> > >> > >> >> > > > you > >> > >> > >> >> > > > could > >> > >> > >> >> > > > never be man enough to admit about Eskimo Barbie, but > >> > >> > >> >> > > > that's > >> > >> > >> >> > > > the > >> > >> > >> >> > > > difference between you wingnuts and those with an IQ. > >> > >> > >> >> > > > >> > >> > >> >> > > He is the choice of the Democrats in South Carolina to > >> > >> > >> >> > > be > >> > >> > >> >> > > their > >> > >> > >> >> > > candidate for Senator in the general election. Good or > >> > >> > >> >> > > poor > >> > >> > >> >> > > candidate > >> > >> > >> >> > > won't be determined until after the election. > >> > >> > >> >> > > >> > >> > >> >> > Yes, and Republicans in the same state elected Mark > >> > >> > >> >> > Sanford > >> > >> > >> >> > for > >> > >> > >> >> > their > >> > >> > >> >> > Governor. Do you see a pattern here between South > >> > >> > >> >> > Carolinians > >> > >> > >> >> > and > >> > >> > >> >> > their > >> > >> > >> >> > ability to handle elections like adults? > >> > >> > >> >> > > >> > >> > >> >> > >> > >> > >> >> Now you are disparaging the entire state of South Carolina. > >> > >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > Well, it does seem that they could do with adult supervision > >> > >> > >> > when > >> > >> > >> > it > >> > >> > >> > comes to their politics. > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> Same could be said about the voter fraud morons in Ohio. > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > Cite, please? > >> > >> > > >> > >> > We've been over this before Billy boy. Do your own research for > >> > >> > once > >> > >> > in > >> > >> > your > >> > >> > life. > >> > >> > >> > >> Run away, Mike! > >> > > > >> > > Indeed - he has no cite; it's just empty blather. > >> > > > >> > > Caught with the old trousers down, I'm afraid, Mikey! > >> > > >> > http://www.upi.com/Top_News/2007/11/05/Probation-given-in-recount-rigging > >> > -ca > >> > se > >> > /UPI-76281194312570/ > >> > > >> > Googling Ohio voter fraud only returns 127,000 hits. > >> > >> Googling "Bush lied" returns 3,600,000 hits. What does that prove? > > > > "GoP voter fraud" gives you 216,000 hits, and "Republican voter fraud" > > returns 2,120,000. So the Republicans are almost twenty times as bad as > > the Democrats. Oh, dear :-) > > No, it only shows the moonbats like to type. But not when you Google, is that it? -- Alan Baker Vancouver, British Columbia <http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg>
From: bknight on 22 Jul 2010 15:05 On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 13:52:58 -0400, William Clark <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote: >In article <alangbaker-34B705.09242522072010(a)news.shawcable.com>, >"GoP voter fraud" gives you 216,000 hits, and "Republican voter fraud" >returns 2,120,000. So the Republicans are almost twenty times as bad as >the Democrats. Oh, dear :-) The GOP is the Republican party Bill. BK
From: bknight on 22 Jul 2010 15:13 On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 13:26:01 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > ><bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message >news:o9vg46p7ua1gqs2ei5gih8p7sbkjntsrhn(a)4ax.com... >> On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 09:35:32 -0700 (PDT), dsc-ky >> <Dudley.Cornman(a)eku.edu> wrote: >> >>>> Then it went to WMDs, >>>> which we all know now to be untrue. >>> >>>Well, we sure didn't find any... whether that is conclusive proof or >>>not that they never existed? I don't know? SH was a very bad guy... >>>should have been killed when we were there in 91... >> >> He was our buddy then. We have a history of backing bad guys, then >> turning on them. >> >> BK > >I think it's more of good guys turning bad. > Let's see. Allende, Batista, Saddam, Noriega,, Ayub Khan, Musharraf, Suharto. All good guys at first? I think not. BK
From: bknight on 22 Jul 2010 15:15 On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 11:30:09 -0700 (PDT), "John B." <johnb505(a)gmail.com> wrote: >On Jul 22, 1:02�pm, "MNMikeW" <MNMiik...(a)aol.com> wrote: >> Well, my opinion is that removing Saddam was a good thing for the region. >> The timing is debatable but I believe we would have had to do it eventually >> anyway. I think Saddam did indeed have WMDs, but they were moved elsewhere >> before the invasion. > >A good thing for the region? So, we went to war there to make life >better for Iran and Syria? Where do you suppose the WMD was moved to? A better question is where was our CIA spy planes when they were moving all of this equipment? There were no WMDS. BK
From: Moderate on 22 Jul 2010 15:20
"Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message news:alangbaker-0E2AA9.09351722072010(a)news.shawcable.com... > > Armitage wasn't a Clinton appointee. > > He served as an aide to Senator Bob Dole, a foreign policy advisor to > Ronald Reagan, was promoted to Deputy Assistant of Defence for Asia and > then further promoted to Assistant Secretary of Defence for > International Security Policy by his administration. > > In 1993 -- when Clinton was president, he entered the private sector... > > ...where he remained until George W. Bush's presidency. > > So not only is your smoke screen rather obvious, it's just plain wrong. Armitage served in the Clinton State Department until May 1993. |