Support Sharon Angle
in [Golf]
|
From: MNMikeW on 22 Jul 2010 17:12 <bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message news:k46h46tkt4v0j0c7mfi72hjuqnv4idf4as(a)4ax.com... > On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 11:30:09 -0700 (PDT), "John B." > <johnb505(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >>On Jul 22, 1:02 pm, "MNMikeW" <MNMiik...(a)aol.com> wrote: > >>> Well, my opinion is that removing Saddam was a good thing for the >>> region. >>> The timing is debatable but I believe we would have had to do it >>> eventually >>> anyway. I think Saddam did indeed have WMDs, but they were moved >>> elsewhere >>> before the invasion. >> >>A good thing for the region? So, we went to war there to make life >>better for Iran and Syria? Where do you suppose the WMD was moved to? > > A better question is where was our CIA spy planes when they were > moving all of this equipment? There were no WMDS. > > BK The truck convoys were photographed by satellite in 2002.
From: dsc-ky on 22 Jul 2010 17:18 On Jul 22, 1:16 pm, bkni...(a)conramp.net wrote: > On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 09:27:34 -0700 (PDT), dsc-ky > > > > > > <Dudley.Corn...(a)eku.edu> wrote: > >On Jul 21, 9:58 pm, bkni...(a)conramp.net wrote: > >> On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 18:19:30 -0700 (PDT), dsc-ky > > >> <Dudley.Corn...(a)eku.edu> wrote: > >> >On Jul 21, 7:33 pm, bkni...(a)conramp.net wrote: > >> >> On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 16:01:35 -0700 (PDT), dsc-ky > > >> >> <Dudley.Corn...(a)eku.edu> wrote: > > >> >> >I don't doubt there was some corruption in Bush's administration > >> >> >too... or any other for that matter. Has nothing to do do with my > >> >> >party or which is in power. Wasn't Bush/Cheney accused of giving large > >> >> >contracts to their buddies? > > >> >> My position is that Obama himself, not someone in his > >> >> administration, is not corrupt. > > >> >> I don't think Bush, himself, was corrupt. > > >> >> I do think that Cheney is, and was. > > >> >> BK > > >> >In that case, he surrounded himself with corruption... complicity. > > >> I really think that he was so unaware that he had no idea what they > >> were doing. Cheney and company used him. I don't see Bush as a bad > >> guy, just inept. > > >I meant Obamma (moreso than Bush). > > That doesn't make sense Dudley. In what case? > > BK I'll try to be clearer... If Obama isn't corrupt, but he appointed a load of corrupt people to his administration... then he's responsible for corruption in his administration.
From: dsc-ky on 22 Jul 2010 17:19 On Jul 22, 1:18 pm, bkni...(a)conramp.net wrote: > On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 09:35:32 -0700 (PDT), dsc-ky > > <Dudley.Corn...(a)eku.edu> wrote: > >> Then it went to WMDs, > >> which we all know now to be untrue. > > >Well, we sure didn't find any... whether that is conclusive proof or > >not that they never existed? I don't know? SH was a very bad guy... > >should have been killed when we were there in 91... > > He was our buddy then. We have a history of backing bad guys, then > turning on them. > > BK Then we should have turned sooner...
From: dsc-ky on 22 Jul 2010 17:23 On Jul 22, 2:17 pm, "John B." <johnb...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Jul 21, 6:52 pm, dsc-ky <Dudley.Corn...(a)eku.edu> wrote: > > > > > > > On Jul 21, 3:04 pm, bkni...(a)conramp.net wrote: > > > > On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 13:36:02 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiik...(a)aol.com> > > > wrote: > > > > >Looks Like Blago is not taking the stand either now. Gee, wonder why.. > > > > Don't get me wrong Mike, I want Blagojevich to go to jail for the > > > maximum. I just don't believe that Obama is corrupt. > > > > Damn, just show me a Republican that would make a better President and > > > I'll vote for him. I know, big laugh that they all are. Bullshit. > > > Can you imagine that McCain would have done anything better? He can't > > > make his mind up about anything. > > > > BK > > > McCain would likely not have done a whole lot... which in this case > > could have saved us billions of wasted dollars we don't have from the > > stimulus package alone. Not that I'm fond of McCain... I'm not. If > > McCain were in, maybe there would have been gridlock... which is > > almost always good. > > You're right -- McCain wouldn't have done a goddamn thing and as a > result we might well be in a depression right now. Or not?
From: bknight on 22 Jul 2010 17:48
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 16:12:40 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > ><bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message >news:k46h46tkt4v0j0c7mfi72hjuqnv4idf4as(a)4ax.com... >> On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 11:30:09 -0700 (PDT), "John B." >> <johnb505(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >>>On Jul 22, 1:02 pm, "MNMikeW" <MNMiik...(a)aol.com> wrote: >> >>>> Well, my opinion is that removing Saddam was a good thing for the >>>> region. >>>> The timing is debatable but I believe we would have had to do it >>>> eventually >>>> anyway. I think Saddam did indeed have WMDs, but they were moved >>>> elsewhere >>>> before the invasion. >>> >>>A good thing for the region? So, we went to war there to make life >>>better for Iran and Syria? Where do you suppose the WMD was moved to? >> >> A better question is where was our CIA spy planes when they were >> moving all of this equipment? There were no WMDS. >> >> BK > >The truck convoys were photographed by satellite in 2002. > There were reports of such to Syria, but never confirmed by our intelligence sources. There were no WMDS. BK |