From: William Clark on
In article <MPG.26ac099effc188d498a11d(a)news.giganews.com>,
BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote:

> In article <alangbaker-442F6C.15502117072010(a)news.shawcable.com>,
> alangbaker(a)telus.net says...
> >
> > In article <8a8jvoFdfaU1(a)mid.individual.net>,
> > "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote:
> >
> > > "John B." <johnb505(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
> > > news:22d39422-590d-4b9a-8f8e-8e6a3152d2dd(a)d8g2000yqf.googlegroups.com...
> > > On Jul 15, 7:57 am, BAR <sc...(a)you.com> wrote:
> > > > In article <7860b860-9880-45f3-bed8-571b47fafa25
> > > > @w12g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>, johnb...(a)gmail.com says...
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > On Jul 14, 9:47 pm, kenpitts <ken.p...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > On Jul 13, 5:45 pm, Anonymous <cri...(a)ecn.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > > > GET HE DUNG REID OUT.
> > > >
> > > > > > Oh man, would I ever love it if Reid was shown the door.
> > > >
> > > > > > Ken
> > > >
> > > > > I'm no fan of Harry Reid, but this Angle woman is a wack-job.
> > > >
> > > > And, Reid isn't a whack job?
> > >
> > > Angle is no different from Tim McVeigh, except that she hasn't blown
> > > anything up. She said the government should be overthrown through an
> > > armed insurrection. Do you know of anything Reid has said that's
> > > comparable to that?
> > > -----------------------------------------
> > >
> > > She didn't exactly say that.
> > >
> > > You know, our Founding Fathers, they put that Second Amendment in there
> > > for a good reason and that was for the people to protect themselves
> > > against
> > > a tyrannical government. And in fact Thomas Jefferson said it's good for
> > > a
> > > country to have a revolution every 20 years.
> >
> >
> >
> > >
> > > I hope that's not where we're going, but, you know, if this Congress
> > > keeps
> > > going the way it is, people are really looking toward those Second
> > > Amendment
> > > remedies and saying my goodness what can we do to turn this country
> > > around?
> > > I'll tell you the first thing we need to do is take Harry Reid out.
> >
> > So she suggested that Harry Reid should be killed and you're OK with
> > that?
>
> Is Harry Reid part of an oppressive government?

Clearly, no.
From: William Clark on
In article <MPG.26accb2c680cad1098a123(a)news.giganews.com>,
BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote:

> In article <alangbaker-560194.17450817072010(a)news.shawcable.com>,
> alangbaker(a)telus.net says...
> > > > > I hope that's not where we're going, but, you know, if this
> > > > > Congress
> > > > > keeps
> > > > > going the way it is, people are really looking toward those Second
> > > > > Amendment
> > > > > remedies and saying my goodness what can we do to turn this country
> > > > > around?
> > > > > I'll tell you the first thing we need to do is take Harry Reid out.
> > > >
> > > > So she suggested that Harry Reid should be killed and you're OK with
> > > > that?
> > >
> > > Is Harry Reid part of an oppressive government?
> >
> > Not unless you are going to redefine every democratically elected
> > government that does something you don't like as "opressive".
> >
>
> Governing against the will of the American people is oppressive.

Excuse me - election day, 2008.
From: William Clark on
In article <MPG.26aceb7b8272289898a125(a)news.giganews.com>,
BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote:

> In article <4c430ff3$0$4988$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>,
> nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com says...
> >
> > On Sun, 18 Jul 2010 09:26:58 -0400, BAR wrote:
> > > In article <alangbaker-560194.17450817072010(a)news.shawcable.com>,
> > > alangbaker(a)telus.net says...
> > >>>
> > >>>>> I hope that's not where we're going, but, you know, if this
> > >>>>> Congress keeps going the way it is, people are really looking
> > >>>>> toward those Second Amendment remedies and saying my goodness what
> > >>>>> can we do to turn this country around? I'll tell you the first
> > >>>>> thing we need to do is take Harry Reid out.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> So she suggested that Harry Reid should be killed and you're OK
> > >>>> with that?
> > >>>
> > >>> Is Harry Reid part of an oppressive government?
> > >>
> > >> Not unless you are going to redefine every democratically elected
> > >> government that does something you don't like as "opressive".
> > >
> > > Governing against the will of the American people is oppressive.
> >
> > Could you please share with us how a democratically elected government
> > could be governing against the will of the American people?
>
> Your closed mind wouldn't understand.

Just as your childish one can't explain the inexplicable.
From: Don Kirkman on
On Sun, 18 Jul 2010 09:26:58 -0400, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote:

>In article <alangbaker-560194.17450817072010(a)news.shawcable.com>,
>alangbaker(a)telus.net says...
>> > > > I hope that's not where we're going, but, you know, if this Congress
>> > > > keeps
>> > > > going the way it is, people are really looking toward those Second
>> > > > Amendment
>> > > > remedies and saying my goodness what can we do to turn this country
>> > > > around?
>> > > > I'll tell you the first thing we need to do is take Harry Reid out.
>> > >
>> > > So she suggested that Harry Reid should be killed and you're OK with
>> > > that?
>> >
>> > Is Harry Reid part of an oppressive government?
>>
>> Not unless you are going to redefine every democratically elected
>> government that does something you don't like as "opressive".

>Governing against the will of the American people is oppressive.

The Constitution and its enabling legislation define how the will of
the American people is to be expressed. That determination in 2008 is
in effect until the next occasion.
--
Don Kirkman
donsno2(a)charter.net
From: BAR on
In article <0qg646du2la00p0rsnpcbbaum4vq9p2mad(a)4ax.com>, donsno2
@charter.net says...
>
> On Sun, 18 Jul 2010 09:26:58 -0400, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote:
>
> >In article <alangbaker-560194.17450817072010(a)news.shawcable.com>,
> >alangbaker(a)telus.net says...
> >> > > > I hope that's not where we're going, but, you know, if this Congress
> >> > > > keeps
> >> > > > going the way it is, people are really looking toward those Second
> >> > > > Amendment
> >> > > > remedies and saying my goodness what can we do to turn this country
> >> > > > around?
> >> > > > I'll tell you the first thing we need to do is take Harry Reid out.
> >> > >
> >> > > So she suggested that Harry Reid should be killed and you're OK with
> >> > > that?
> >> >
> >> > Is Harry Reid part of an oppressive government?
> >>
> >> Not unless you are going to redefine every democratically elected
> >> government that does something you don't like as "opressive".
>
> >Governing against the will of the American people is oppressive.
>
> The Constitution and its enabling legislation define how the will of
> the American people is to be expressed. That determination in 2008 is
> in effect until the next occasion.

The will of the people is expressed to their representatives throught
the year, every year. New representatives are elected every two years.