From: Moderate on 19 Jul 2010 08:19 "John B." <johnb505(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:7860b860-9880-45f3-bed8-571b47fafa25(a)w12g2000yqj.googlegroups.com... On Jul 14, 9:47 pm, kenpitts <ken.p...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Jul 13, 5:45 pm, Anonymous <cri...(a)ecn.org> wrote: > > > GET HE DUNG REID OUT. > > Oh man, would I ever love it if Reid was shown the door. > > Ken I'm no fan of Harry Reid, but this Angle woman is a wack-job. ********************************************************* How do you feel about Alvin Greene?
From: dsc-ky on 19 Jul 2010 13:28 On Jul 18, 2:12 pm, William Clark <wcla...(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote: > In article <MPG.26ac099effc188d498a...(a)news.giganews.com>, > > > > > > BAR <sc...(a)you.com> wrote: > > In article <alangbaker-442F6C.15502117072...(a)news.shawcable.com>, > > alangba...(a)telus.net says... > > > > In article <8a8jvoFdf...(a)mid.individual.net>, > > > "MNMikeW" <MNMiik...(a)aol.com> wrote: > > > > > "John B." <johnb...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > > >news:22d39422-590d-4b9a-8f8e-8e6a3152d2dd(a)d8g2000yqf.googlegroups.com... > > > > On Jul 15, 7:57 am, BAR <sc...(a)you.com> wrote: > > > > > In article <7860b860-9880-45f3-bed8-571b47fafa25 > > > > > @w12g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>, johnb...(a)gmail.com says... > > > > > > > On Jul 14, 9:47 pm, kenpitts <ken.p...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Jul 13, 5:45 pm, Anonymous <cri...(a)ecn.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > > GET HE DUNG REID OUT. > > > > > > > > Oh man, would I ever love it if Reid was shown the door. > > > > > > > > Ken > > > > > > > I'm no fan of Harry Reid, but this Angle woman is a wack-job. > > > > > > And, Reid isn't a whack job? > > > > > Angle is no different from Tim McVeigh, except that she hasn't blown > > > > anything up. She said the government should be overthrown through an > > > > armed insurrection. Do you know of anything Reid has said that's > > > > comparable to that? > > > > ----------------------------------------- > > > > > She didn't exactly say that. > > > > > You know, our Founding Fathers, they put that Second Amendment in there > > > > for a good reason and that was for the people to protect themselves > > > > against > > > > a tyrannical government. And in fact Thomas Jefferson said it's good for > > > > a > > > > country to have a revolution every 20 years. > > > > > I hope that's not where we're going, but, you know, if this Congress > > > > keeps > > > > going the way it is, people are really looking toward those Second > > > > Amendment > > > > remedies and saying my goodness what can we do to turn this country > > > > around? > > > > I'll tell you the first thing we need to do is take Harry Reid out. > > > > So she suggested that Harry Reid should be killed and you're OK with > > > that? > > > Is Harry Reid part of an oppressive government? > > Clearly, no.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Is it really that clear cut.? I consider the health care bill oppresive. He had a huge part in that. dsc
From: dsc-ky on 19 Jul 2010 13:34 On Jul 18, 2:12 pm, William Clark <wcla...(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote: > In article <MPG.26accb2c680cad1098a...(a)news.giganews.com>, > > > > > > BAR <sc...(a)you.com> wrote: > > In article <alangbaker-560194.17450817072...(a)news.shawcable.com>, > > alangba...(a)telus.net says... > > > > > > I hope that's not where we're going, but, you know, if this > > > > > > Congress > > > > > > keeps > > > > > > going the way it is, people are really looking toward those Second > > > > > > Amendment > > > > > > remedies and saying my goodness what can we do to turn this country > > > > > > around? > > > > > > I'll tell you the first thing we need to do is take Harry Reid out. > > > > > > So she suggested that Harry Reid should be killed and you're OK with > > > > > that? > > > > > Is Harry Reid part of an oppressive government? > > > > Not unless you are going to redefine every democratically elected > > > government that does something you don't like as "opressive". > > > Governing against the will of the American people is oppressive. > > Excuse me - election day, 2008.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - It is true all these people (Obamma, Reid, Pelosi, etc) were elected. But they don't mind at all to govern against what the people want. They pushed though the healt care bill (something like 75% of Americans were against that particular bill). The Pres. is pushing to sue Arizona over the immigration thing... the VAST majority of Americans (including a large number of legal immigrants) are in favor of the Az law. Cap and Trade... bailing out GM... this regime doesn't care at all about what the people want... Hopefully we can undo some of these things at some point in the not to distant future.
From: Don Kirkman on 19 Jul 2010 13:42 On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 07:18:17 -0400, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: >In article <obq7469v2pedlcgrjuqicu27u3fkpij8hr(a)4ax.com>, donsno2 >@charter.net says... >> >> On Sun, 18 Jul 2010 14:38:13 -0400, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: >> >> >In article <0qg646du2la00p0rsnpcbbaum4vq9p2mad(a)4ax.com>, donsno2 >> >@charter.net says... >> >> >> On Sun, 18 Jul 2010 09:26:58 -0400, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: >> >> >> >In article <alangbaker-560194.17450817072010(a)news.shawcable.com>, >> >> >alangbaker(a)telus.net says... >> >> >> > > > I hope that's not where we're going, but, you know, if this Congress >> >> >> > > > keeps >> >> >> > > > going the way it is, people are really looking toward those Second >> >> >> > > > Amendment >> >> >> > > > remedies and saying my goodness what can we do to turn this country >> >> >> > > > around? >> >> >> > > > I'll tell you the first thing we need to do is take Harry Reid out. >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > So she suggested that Harry Reid should be killed and you're OK with >> >> >> > > that? >> >> >> >> > Is Harry Reid part of an oppressive government? >> >> >> >> >> >> Not unless you are going to redefine every democratically elected >> >> >> government that does something you don't like as "opressive". >> >> >> >> >Governing against the will of the American people is oppressive. >> >> >> >> The Constitution and its enabling legislation define how the will of >> >> the American people is to be expressed. That determination in 2008 is >> >> in effect until the next occasion. >> >> >The will of the people is expressed to their representatives throught >> >the year, every year. New representatives are elected every two years. >> >> And those representatives are elected with the assumption that they >> will carry out the will of the American people who elected them. "The >> American people" doesn't mean all the individuals in the country, it >> means the "body politic." Between elections it's fair game to try >> to persuade politicians to listen to the wishes of various groups, but >> no one such group speaks for "the wishes of the American people." > >Harriet Meyers. > >Immigration Amnesty Bill, often called Comprehensive Immagration Reform > >Thes are just two issues where the will of the people was expressed >between election cycles that caused the government to step back and re- >evaluate its course. There was no Tea Party at the time these issues >arose and the will of the poeple was still heard and heeded. QED, but not exactly a response to my point. :-) -- Don Kirkman donsno2(a)charter.net
From: William Clark on 19 Jul 2010 13:56
In article <b0f1dc13-3802-4f95-ab60-2868e5ab0582(a)z10g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>, dsc-ky <Dudley.Cornman(a)eku.edu> wrote: > On Jul 18, 2:12�pm, William Clark <wcla...(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> > wrote: > > In article <MPG.26ac099effc188d498a...(a)news.giganews.com>, > > > > > > > > > > > > �BAR <sc...(a)you.com> wrote: > > > In article <alangbaker-442F6C.15502117072...(a)news.shawcable.com>, > > > alangba...(a)telus.net says... > > > > > > In article <8a8jvoFdf...(a)mid.individual.net>, > > > > �"MNMikeW" <MNMiik...(a)aol.com> wrote: > > > > > > > "John B." <johnb...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > > > >news:22d39422-590d-4b9a-8f8e-8e6a3152d2dd(a)d8g2000yqf.googlegroups.com.. > > > > >. > > > > > On Jul 15, 7:57 am, BAR <sc...(a)you.com> wrote: > > > > > > In article <7860b860-9880-45f3-bed8-571b47fafa25 > > > > > > @w12g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>, johnb...(a)gmail.com says... > > > > > > > > > On Jul 14, 9:47 pm, kenpitts <ken.p...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Jul 13, 5:45 pm, Anonymous <cri...(a)ecn.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > GET HE DUNG REID OUT. > > > > > > > > > > Oh man, would I ever love it if Reid was shown the door. > > > > > > > > > > Ken > > > > > > > > > I'm no fan of Harry Reid, but this Angle woman is a wack-job. > > > > > > > > And, Reid isn't a whack job? > > > > > > > Angle is no different from Tim McVeigh, except that she hasn't blown > > > > > anything up. She said the government should be overthrown through an > > > > > armed insurrection. Do you know of anything Reid has said that's > > > > > comparable to that? > > > > > ----------------------------------------- > > > > > > > She didn't exactly say that. > > > > > > > � You know, our Founding Fathers, they put that Second Amendment in > > > > > there > > > > > for a good reason and that was for the people to protect themselves > > > > > against > > > > > a tyrannical government. And in fact Thomas Jefferson said it's good > > > > > for > > > > > a > > > > > country to have a revolution every 20 years. > > > > > > > � I hope that's not where we're going, but, you know, if this > > > > > Congress > > > > > � keeps > > > > > going the way it is, people are really looking toward those Second > > > > > Amendment > > > > > remedies and saying my goodness what can we do to turn this country > > > > > around? > > > > > I'll tell you the first thing we need to do is take Harry Reid out. > > > > > > So she suggested that Harry Reid should be killed and you're OK with > > > > that? > > > > > Is Harry Reid part of an oppressive government? > > > > Clearly, no.- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > Is it really that clear cut.? I consider the health care bill > oppresive. He had a huge part in that. > > dsc There you have it - you consider it "oppressive" - others consider it not radical enough. I think you are confusing "oppressive" with "unpalatable", and there is a clear difference. |