The BP debacle (was: Need a job??)
in [Golf]
|
Prev: funny thing
Next: Bongo stampede at World Cup
From: Jack Hollis on 8 Jun 2010 12:44 On Tue, 8 Jun 2010 09:00:36 -0700 (PDT), "John B." <johnb505(a)gmail.com> wrote: >On Jun 8, 10:30=A0am, Jack Hollis <xslee...(a)aol.com> wrote: >> On Mon, 7 Jun 2010 19:00:51 -0700 (PDT), "John B." >> >> <johnb...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >I have asked and asked and asked again what the government should have >> >done that it hasn't done. All I've gotten so far is that they took a >> >long time to deliver some sand bags. >> >> They should have stopped the oil from reaching the beaches and wetland >> areas so no birds or sea life would have died. > >How? By responding faster and better than they did. Every soiled beach and wet land is another Obama failure. And there are going to be a lot of them.
From: John B. on 8 Jun 2010 13:22 On Jun 8, 12:44 pm, Jack Hollis <xslee...(a)aol.com> wrote: > On Tue, 8 Jun 2010 09:00:36 -0700 (PDT), "John B." > > <johnb...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >On Jun 8, 10:30=A0am, Jack Hollis <xslee...(a)aol.com> wrote: > >> On Mon, 7 Jun 2010 19:00:51 -0700 (PDT), "John B." > > >> <johnb...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> >I have asked and asked and asked again what the government should have > >> >done that it hasn't done. All I've gotten so far is that they took a > >> >long time to deliver some sand bags. > > >> They should have stopped the oil from reaching the beaches and wetland > >> areas so no birds or sea life would have died. > > >How? > > By responding faster and better than they did. Every soiled beach and > wet land is another Obama failure. And there are going to be a lot of > them. Responding how? With what? What makes you think the EPA should be equipped to respond to a catastrophe of this magnitude? I know you take a particular glee in blaming this on Obama, but you seem unable to provide empirical support for it.
From: Moderate on 8 Jun 2010 14:12 "John B." <johnb505(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:fcbe16fb-fef6-4323-9e00-3d1ae75dce77(a)c10g2000yqi.googlegroups.com... On Jun 8, 12:44 pm, Jack Hollis <xslee...(a)aol.com> wrote: > On Tue, 8 Jun 2010 09:00:36 -0700 (PDT), "John B." > > <johnb...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >On Jun 8, 10:30=A0am, Jack Hollis <xslee...(a)aol.com> wrote: > >> On Mon, 7 Jun 2010 19:00:51 -0700 (PDT), "John B." > > >> <johnb...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> >I have asked and asked and asked again what the government should have > >> >done that it hasn't done. All I've gotten so far is that they took a > >> >long time to deliver some sand bags. > > >> They should have stopped the oil from reaching the beaches and wetland > >> areas so no birds or sea life would have died. > > >How? > > By responding faster and better than they did. Every soiled beach and > wet land is another Obama failure. And there are going to be a lot of > them. Responding how? With what? What makes you think the EPA should be equipped to respond to a catastrophe of this magnitude? I know you take a particular glee in blaming this on Obama, but you seem unable to provide empirical support for it. ****************************************************** The empirical evidence is in the marshes and on the beaches.
From: John B. on 8 Jun 2010 14:48 On Jun 8, 2:12 pm, "Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> wrote: > "John B." <johnb...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > news:fcbe16fb-fef6-4323-9e00-3d1ae75dce77(a)c10g2000yqi.googlegroups.com... > On Jun 8, 12:44 pm, Jack Hollis <xslee...(a)aol.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Tue, 8 Jun 2010 09:00:36 -0700 (PDT), "John B." > > > <johnb...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > >On Jun 8, 10:30=A0am, Jack Hollis <xslee...(a)aol.com> wrote: > > >> On Mon, 7 Jun 2010 19:00:51 -0700 (PDT), "John B." > > > >> <johnb...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > >> >I have asked and asked and asked again what the government should have > > >> >done that it hasn't done. All I've gotten so far is that they took a > > >> >long time to deliver some sand bags. > > > >> They should have stopped the oil from reaching the beaches and wetland > > >> areas so no birds or sea life would have died. > > > >How? > > > By responding faster and better than they did. Every soiled beach and > > wet land is another Obama failure. And there are going to be a lot of > > them. > > Responding how? With what? What makes you think the EPA should be > equipped to respond to a catastrophe of this magnitude? I know you > take a particular glee in blaming this on Obama, but you seem unable > to provide empirical support for it. > ****************************************************** > > The empirical evidence is in the marshes and on the beaches. And your view is that the EPA should have been able to keep millions of barrels of oil from reaching shore? You've got to be kidding.
From: Don Kirkman on 8 Jun 2010 14:55
On Tue, 8 Jun 2010 07:22:21 -0400, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: >When are you going to stop blaming Reagan and Bush? When are your side going to acknowledge that Reagan, as California governor, raised taxes over 150%? That's "conservative"? Reagan, like many politicians, was neither conservative nor liberal, but pragmatic, trying to get things done that would benefit the public at large? -- Don Kirkman donsno2(a)charter.net |