From: William Clark on
In article <onss065kbl973aqpcgkkghsjcljkk1n2gd(a)4ax.com>,
Jack Hollis <xsleeper(a)aol.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 8 Jun 2010 08:59:40 -0700 (PDT), "John B."
> <johnb505(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> The guy is a film director, you've got to be kidding me. =A0The Idea
> >> that he could come in and help BP is laughable. =A0
> >
> >What would be the harm? He says he's well-acquainted with people who
> >do deep-sea submersible work. If I were the CEO of BP, I'd be looking
> >for any help I could get.
>
> He'd just get in the way and add nothing.

As opposed to who . . . is adding anything?
From: William Clark on
In article <7vks069uh29muvlmijdh6r2b4r9rgvs13t(a)4ax.com>,
Jack Hollis <xsleeper(a)aol.com> wrote:

> On Mon, 7 Jun 2010 19:00:51 -0700 (PDT), "John B."
> <johnb505(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >I have asked and asked and asked again what the government should have
> >done that it hasn't done. All I've gotten so far is that they took a
> >long time to deliver some sand bags.
>
> They should have stopped the oil from reaching the beaches and wetland
> areas so no birds or sea life would have died.

How? You are such an expert on corralling an oil slick the size of two
states, tell us how.
From: William Clark on
In article <apss06lov305i1npoeph39bb6lalu6mo3m(a)4ax.com>,
Jack Hollis <xsleeper(a)aol.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 8 Jun 2010 09:00:36 -0700 (PDT), "John B."
> <johnb505(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >On Jun 8, 10:30=A0am, Jack Hollis <xslee...(a)aol.com> wrote:
> >> On Mon, 7 Jun 2010 19:00:51 -0700 (PDT), "John B."
> >>
> >> <johnb...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >I have asked and asked and asked again what the government should have
> >> >done that it hasn't done. All I've gotten so far is that they took a
> >> >long time to deliver some sand bags.
> >>
> >> They should have stopped the oil from reaching the beaches and wetland
> >> areas so no birds or sea life would have died.
> >
> >How?
>
>
> By responding faster and better than they did. Every soiled beach and
> wet land is another Obama failure. And there are going to be a lot of
> them.

You are simply not answering the question. The slick is bigger than
Rhode Island, so getting there "faster and better" is not the issue. It
is getting there with resources on the scale necessary and appropriate
to do something, and supertankers are about the only hope. The oil
companies run those, in case you forgot.
From: William Clark on
In article
<fcbe16fb-fef6-4323-9e00-3d1ae75dce77(a)c10g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>,
"John B." <johnb505(a)gmail.com> wrote:

> On Jun 8, 12:44�pm, Jack Hollis <xslee...(a)aol.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, 8 Jun 2010 09:00:36 -0700 (PDT), "John B."
> >
> > <johnb...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > >On Jun 8, 10:30=A0am, Jack Hollis <xslee...(a)aol.com> wrote:
> > >> On Mon, 7 Jun 2010 19:00:51 -0700 (PDT), "John B."
> >
> > >> <johnb...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> >I have asked and asked and asked again what the government should have
> > >> >done that it hasn't done. All I've gotten so far is that they took a
> > >> >long time to deliver some sand bags.
> >
> > >> They should have stopped the oil from reaching the beaches and wetland
> > >> areas so no birds or sea life would have died.
> >
> > >How?
> >
> > By responding faster and better than they did. �Every soiled beach and
> > wet land is another Obama failure. �And there are going to be a lot of
> > them.
>
> Responding how? With what? What makes you think the EPA should be
> equipped to respond to a catastrophe of this magnitude? I know you
> take a particular glee in blaming this on Obama, but you seem unable
> to provide empirical support for it.

He claims to have a PhD, yet he comes up with such total, biased,
stupidity as this. Hmmmm.
From: William Clark on
In article <hum16c$mpt$1(a)speranza.aioe.org>,
"Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> wrote:

> "John B." <johnb505(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:fcbe16fb-fef6-4323-9e00-3d1ae75dce77(a)c10g2000yqi.googlegroups.com...
> On Jun 8, 12:44 pm, Jack Hollis <xslee...(a)aol.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, 8 Jun 2010 09:00:36 -0700 (PDT), "John B."
> >
> > <johnb...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > >On Jun 8, 10:30=A0am, Jack Hollis <xslee...(a)aol.com> wrote:
> > >> On Mon, 7 Jun 2010 19:00:51 -0700 (PDT), "John B."
> >
> > >> <johnb...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> >I have asked and asked and asked again what the government should have
> > >> >done that it hasn't done. All I've gotten so far is that they took a
> > >> >long time to deliver some sand bags.
> >
> > >> They should have stopped the oil from reaching the beaches and wetland
> > >> areas so no birds or sea life would have died.
> >
> > >How?
> >
> > By responding faster and better than they did. Every soiled beach and
> > wet land is another Obama failure. And there are going to be a lot of
> > them.
>
> Responding how? With what? What makes you think the EPA should be
> equipped to respond to a catastrophe of this magnitude? I know you
> take a particular glee in blaming this on Obama, but you seem unable
> to provide empirical support for it.
> ******************************************************
>
> The empirical evidence is in the marshes and on the beaches.

Day late and a dollar short, as per usual.
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33
Prev: funny thing
Next: Bongo stampede at World Cup