The BP debacle (was: Need a job??)
in [Golf]
|
Prev: funny thing
Next: Bongo stampede at World Cup
From: BAR on 9 Jun 2010 07:25 In article <4c0ec7af$0$4833$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>, nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com says... > > On Tue, 08 Jun 2010 13:12:30 -0500, Moderate wrote: > > "John B." <johnb505(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:fcbe16fb- > > fef6-4323-9e00-3d1ae75dce77(a)c10g2000yqi.googlegroups.com... > >> On Jun 8, 12:44 pm, Jack Hollis <xslee...(a)aol.com> wrote: > >>> On Tue, 8 Jun 2010 09:00:36 -0700 (PDT), "John B." > >>> <johnb...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >>>> On Jun 8, 10:30=A0am, Jack Hollis <xslee...(a)aol.com> wrote: > >>>>> On Mon, 7 Jun 2010 19:00:51 -0700 (PDT), "John B." > >>>>> > >>>>>> I have asked and asked and asked again what the government should > >>>>>> have done that it hasn't done. All I've gotten so far is that > >>>>>> they took a long time to deliver some sand bags. > >>>>> > >>>>> They should have stopped the oil from reaching the beaches and > >>>>> wetland areas so no birds or sea life would have died. > >>>> > >>>> How? > >>> > >>> By responding faster and better than they did. Every soiled beach > >>> and wet land is another Obama failure. And there are going to be a > >>> lot of them. > >> > >> Responding how? With what? What makes you think the EPA should be > >> equipped to respond to a catastrophe of this magnitude? I know you > >> take a particular glee in blaming this on Obama, but you seem unable > >> to provide empirical support for it. > > > > The empirical evidence is in the marshes and on the beaches. > > It seems like you've gotten lost again. John has been asking what, > specifically, Obama might have done to reduce the impact of BP's oil > spill. Your sandbags are a joke. There are hundreds, thousands of miles > of coastline. > > Why don't they just drain the Gulf? That might be easier. Your inability to understand the shortest distance between to points is a straight line is amazing.
From: BAR on 9 Jun 2010 07:46 In article <f1b344c6-9292-4b0f-9b6c-f6aae3a16662 @y11g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>, johnb505(a)gmail.com says... > > On Jun 8, 9:52�pm, Jack Hollis <xslee...(a)aol.com> wrote: > > On Tue, 8 Jun 2010 10:22:42 -0700 (PDT), "John B." > > > > <johnb...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > >> By responding faster and better than they did. =A0Every soiled beach and > > >> wet land is another Obama failure. =A0And there are going to be a lot of > > >> them. > > > > >Responding how? With what? What makes you think the EPA should be > > >equipped to respond to a catastrophe of this magnitude? I know you > > >take a particular glee in blaming this on Obama, but you seem unable > > >to provide empirical support for it. > > > > FIMA had an impossible job with Katrina and everyone blamed Bush. �Now > > it's Obama's turn. �Unfortunately for Obama, this oil spill will go on > > and on for months. � > > It's FEMA, not FIMA, and they completely fucked up in NO. And Bush did > absolutely nothing until people started screaming at him. > > The government has no equivalent to FEMA for responding to underwater > oil leaks. > > Why do you flatly refuse to be objective? FEMA is a coordinating agency. They are not a solutions agency. FEMA = Federal Emergency Managment Agency and not Federal Emergency Solutions Agency. http://www.fema.gov/about/index.shtm "FEMA?s mission is to support our citizens and first responders to ensure that as a nation we work together to build, sustain, and improve our capability to prepare for, protect against, respond to, recover from, and mitigate all hazards."
From: BAR on 9 Jun 2010 07:47 In article <5d8d8d0e-16d4-4b26-be3a-4914ed99b591@ 5g2000yqz.googlegroups.com>, johnb505(a)gmail.com says... > > On Jun 8, 9:58�pm, Jack Hollis <xslee...(a)aol.com> wrote: > > On Tue, 8 Jun 2010 13:27:39 -0700 (PDT), "John B." > > > > <johnb...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > Democrats, on > > >the other hand, are blamed in perpetuity (see: FDR and LBJ). > > > > FDR is responsible for the unfunded entitlement known as Social > > Security and LBJ is responsible for Medicare. > > > > Both were big mistakes as we are about to see in the next few years. > > But Bush is off-limits, right? Bush screwed up with his expansion of Medicare.
From: BAR on 9 Jun 2010 07:48 In article <13128868297772634.013782nospam- nomail.com(a)news.suddenlink.net>, nospam(a)nomail.com says... > > > > And the largest freshwater marsh in the continental U.S., winter range > > for most migratory waterfowl in N. America, may be completely > > destroyed. > > > > While Obama sat on his hands. > > Obama was playing golf.
From: William Clark on 9 Jun 2010 08:33
In article <70tt0618d7pmb2qaa996o2afl2b3kbl7sg(a)4ax.com>, Jack Hollis <xsleeper(a)aol.com> wrote: > On Tue, 8 Jun 2010 13:12:30 -0500, "Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> > wrote: > > >Responding how? With what? What makes you think the EPA should be > >equipped to respond to a catastrophe of this magnitude? I know you > >take a particular glee in blaming this on Obama, but you seem unable > >to provide empirical support for it. > >****************************************************** > > > >The empirical evidence is in the marshes and on the beaches. > > Exactly, every one will be another demonstration of Obama's > ineptitude. Actually, every one will be another demonstration of BP's duplicity and ineptitude. |