From: Jack Hollis on
On Sun, 6 Jun 2010 17:45:43 -0400, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote:

>Because he the press and the polls are telling him he looks like an
>empty suit. Obama is not a manager nor is he a leader. You should have
>listened to those of us when we told you that two years ago.

Obama's poll numbers, that have been improving a bit over the last
month or so, are moving down again.
From: BAR on
In article <4c0c295d$0$14414$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>,
nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com says...
>
> On Sun, 06 Jun 2010 18:51:24 -0400, BAR wrote:
> > In article <wclark2-DEAC86.18384706062010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-
> > state.edu>, wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com says...
> >
> >> You would have preferred a tortoise over Obama, as long as it had
> >> "GOP" written on its back.
> >
> > Yes
>
> Behold, the True Believer.

When faced with an empty suite like Obama and McCain. The lesser of two
evils is McCain or any other GOP candidate.


From: bknight on
On Sun, 06 Jun 2010 19:18:52 -0400, Jack Hollis <xsleeper(a)aol.com>
wrote:

>On Sun, 06 Jun 2010 15:26:50 -0500, bknight(a)conramp.net wrote:
>
>>>But Katrina was an act of God. The oil spill was caused by BP and
>>>they're Obama's biggest campaign contributor.
>>
>>How, in any way, does that make Obama or the government accountable
>>for cleaning up BP's mess?
>
>The blame for this mess will be shared by BP and Obama. When you're
>in charge, there's no way to avoid blame. It's not fair, but that's
>the way it is.

Not with any intelligent people.

BK
From: John B. on
On Jun 6, 7:17 pm, Jack Hollis <xslee...(a)aol.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 6 Jun 2010 13:14:25 -0700 (PDT), "John B."
>
> <johnb...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> >> In any case, it looks real bad for Obama right now to have a major oil
> >> spill disaster at an offshore drilling site right after he proposed to
> >> expand off shore drilling.
>
> >I think you're incredibly naive to think that a $71,000 contribution
> >to a campaign that cost hundreds of millions would have any effect at
> >all.
>
> BP was Obama's #1 contributor.  If you don't think that counts for
> much, you're the one who is naive.   Of course other Democrats got
> plenty from BP.  As is usually the case, the party in power gets more.

It may count for something, like getting your phone calls returned,
but it's ridiculous to think it would compel the president to expand
off-shore drilling.
From: John B. on
On Jun 6, 7:18 pm, Jack Hollis <xslee...(a)aol.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 06 Jun 2010 15:26:50 -0500, bkni...(a)conramp.net wrote:
> >>But Katrina was an act of God.  The oil spill was caused by BP and
> >>they're Obama's biggest campaign contributor.  
>
> >How, in any way, does that make Obama or the government accountable
> >for cleaning up BP's mess?
>
> The blame for this mess will be shared by BP and Obama.  When you're
> in charge, there's no way to avoid blame.  It's not fair, but that's
> the way it is.

And those who blame Obama -- what will they say he did or didn't do
that was wrong?
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Prev: funny thing
Next: Bongo stampede at World Cup