The BP debacle (was: Need a job??)
in [Golf]
|
Prev: funny thing
Next: Bongo stampede at World Cup
From: bknight on 9 Jun 2010 12:38 On Wed, 9 Jun 2010 09:40:36 -0500, "Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> wrote: >Oil is lighter than water. It is unclear how much oil if any is on the Gulf >floor. > You just don't keep up do you? http://abcnews.go.com/Business/wireStory?id=10558496 >The sand berms would protect the sensitive marsh areas. Too little, too >late from Obama. > The berms wouldn't have helped at any time. The area was too vast. BK
From: dene on 9 Jun 2010 13:44 "BAR" <screw(a)you.com> wrote in message news:MPG.2678897ec5d93b4998a02d(a)news.giganews.com... > In article <etes06hf4ej4ckctudsl70djk0vhdr481u(a)4ax.com>, > bknight(a)conramp.net says... > > > > The sun never sets on the inflated self-absorption of Bert the > > Shallow. > > Right. Bert. Why do you put up with this? He doesn't argue....he merely insults. -Greg
From: Moderate on 9 Jun 2010 14:06 "John B." <johnb505(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:65734ed6-416b-4a73-aeba-7e8af72b4a05(a)q12g2000yqj.googlegroups.com... On Jun 9, 9:37 am, Jack Hollis <xslee...(a)aol.com> wrote: > On Tue, 8 Jun 2010 19:09:13 -0700 (PDT), "John B." > > <johnb...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >It's FEMA, not FIMA, and they completely fucked up in NO. And Bush did > >absolutely nothing until people started screaming at him. > > >The government has no equivalent to FEMA for responding to underwater > >oil leaks. > > >Why do you flatly refuse to be objective? > > I'm being objective. Bush took a lot of heat for Katrina and Obama's > taking a lot of heat for the oil spill. No you're not. Bush deserved it and Obama doesn't. ******************************************************* That is objective?
From: William Clark on 9 Jun 2010 14:08 In article <huo955$fts$1(a)speranza.aioe.org>, "Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> wrote: > "William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in message > news:clark-C95BA3.08372209062010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > > In article <hum9h0$4ec$1(a)speranza.aioe.org>, > > "Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> wrote: > > > >> "John B." <johnb505(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > >> news:56ad3d9c-bbe2-4147-a3e8-4c8ff3f5af0c(a)a30g2000yqn.googlegroups.com... > >> > >> And your view is that the EPA should have been able to keep millions > >> of barrels of oil from reaching shore? You've got to be kidding. > >> ******************************************************** > >> > >> My view is that the President sat on his hands for a month, before > >> approving > >> the sand berms last week. Governor Jindal's requests were ignored as > >> Obama > >> did nothing. > > > > So, genius, tell us all how sand berms help with the underwater > > catastrophe that threatens to wipe out the entire eco-system and food > > chain on the Gulf floor, and render it completely dead and sterile? Come > > on, you have been repeatedly asked for a solution, and all you can come > > up with is silly, and incorrect, finger pointing > *********************************************************** > > Oil is lighter than water. It is unclear how much oil if any is on the Gulf > floor. a) that depends on the particular distillate, and b) it isn't after it has been sprayed wit dispersant, which makes it sink. Duh. > > The sand berms would protect the sensitive marsh areas. Too little, too > late from Obama. OK, so as per usual you evade/miss the point. Cameras and other sensing systems have already detected massive underwater oil plumes that will do far more serious and long term damage than even the oil coming on shore and into the marshes. Here, go educate yourself: http://tiny.cc/p6fv5
From: bknight on 9 Jun 2010 14:33
On Wed, 9 Jun 2010 11:18:44 -0700, "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote: > >There is a double standard at play here, Bobby. Brown routinely makes >outrageous statements and he rarely receives a rebuke from you or Carbs. >You certainly don't insult him. I've been critical here, but mostly in private posts with Randy when I think he's out of line, but you didn't address your situation with Alan and Billy. In keeping with our "co-existing", I don't get involved with you on that. To that end you should avoid remarks about my posts to Bert. > >Furthermore, much of what Bert posts is reasoned. Almost nothing is reasoned. It's all about how it affects Bert, hence my statement " The sun never sets on the inflated self-absorption of Bert the Shallow". He even agreed. > He is not shallow. I disagree. He's extremely shallow, posts before thinking, doesn't do enough background, is a braggart, and thinks that murder is an answer to a political problem. Enmity isn't a strong enough word for my thoughts of him. > As >for what I would do if I was in his situation, I'd plonk you. LOL. You know full well that this won't happen. He's to vain not to want to know what others here think of him. > > Incidentally, you mentioned that you were thinking about the iPhone 4G. I bought the 3G last month. They are great toys, but as phones aren't really very good. BK |