The BP debacle (was: Need a job??)
in [Golf]
|
Prev: funny thing
Next: Bongo stampede at World Cup
From: dene on 9 Jun 2010 16:38 "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote in message news:87ab6rF3uuU1(a)mid.individual.net... > > Bert is a one-eyed idiot, who posts partisan nonsense. No surprise that > > you are his fan-boy, though. It says a lot about you. > > You are one of the most partisan people here. ......not to mention, ignorant. -Greg
From: Carbon on 9 Jun 2010 17:51 On Wed, 09 Jun 2010 09:40:36 -0500, Moderate wrote: > "William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in > message > news:clark-C95BA3.08372209062010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > >> So, genius, tell us all how sand berms help with the underwater >> catastrophe that threatens to wipe out the entire eco-system and food >> chain on the Gulf floor, and render it completely dead and sterile? >> Come on, you have been repeatedly asked for a solution, and all you >> can come up with is silly, and incorrect, finger pointing > > Oil is lighter than water. It is unclear how much oil if any is on > the Gulf floor. > > The sand berms would protect the sensitive marsh areas. Too little, > too late from Obama. You're a joke.
From: Carbon on 9 Jun 2010 17:55 On Wed, 09 Jun 2010 09:31:05 -0500, Moderate wrote: > "John B." <johnb505(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > news:c13ad6a6-3c42-45d9-924f-1c9263a7196e(a)j4g2000yqh.googlegroups.com... >> On Jun 9, 7:20 am, Moderate <nos...(a)nomail.com> wrote: >>> "John B." <johnb...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> And the largest freshwater marsh in the continental U.S., winter >>>> range for most migratory waterfowl in N. America, may be completely >>>> destroyed. >>> >>> While Obama sat on his hands. >> >> You just keep telling yourself that, Mod. And have a nice glass of >> warm milk and some cookies. > > It is a matter of record. The interpretation is a matter of bias.
From: Carbon on 9 Jun 2010 18:01 On Wed, 09 Jun 2010 13:06:48 -0500, Moderate wrote: > "John B." <johnb505(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > news:65734ed6-416b-4a73- > aeba-7e8af72b4a05(a)q12g2000yqj.googlegroups.com... >> On Jun 9, 9:37 am, Jack Hollis <xslee...(a)aol.com> wrote: >>> On Tue, 8 Jun 2010 19:09:13 -0700 (PDT), "John B." >>> <johnb...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> It's FEMA, not FIMA, and they completely fucked up in NO. And Bush >>>> did absolutely nothing until people started screaming at him. >>>> >>>> The government has no equivalent to FEMA for responding to >>>> underwater oil leaks. >>>> >>>> Why do you flatly refuse to be objective? >>> >>> I'm being objective. Bush took a lot of heat for Katrina and Obama's >>> taking a lot of heat for the oil spill. >> >> No you're not. Bush deserved it and Obama doesn't. > > That is objective? Yes. Bush and his handlers appointed a grossly unqualified cronie to head up FEMA while folding it into the DHS and stripping it of any budgetary control. Suddenly you have this important agency with no budget being run by some clown that no one took seriously. Bush's bungling was a disaster waiting to happen. You will not find similar incompetence in Obama's handling of BP's oil spill, no matter how desperately you want to.
From: Carbon on 9 Jun 2010 18:02
On Wed, 09 Jun 2010 14:40:01 -0500, Moderate wrote: > "Jack Hollis" <xsleeper(a)aol.com> wrote in message > news:q2qv06laac2tofrd766m75o6mh857d930t(a)4ax.com... >> On Wed, 9 Jun 2010 08:36:05 -0700 (PDT), "John B." <johnb505(a)gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>>> I'm being objective. =A0Bush took a lot of heat for Katrina and >>>> Obama's taking a lot of heat for the oil spill. =A0 >>> >>>No you're not. Bush deserved it and Obama doesn't. >> >> No, you've got it backwards. Obama deserves it and Bush didn't. > > Let's be objective. Bush was expected to prevent acts of God. Obama is > not accountable for companies the government inspects, approves and > regulates. You are incapable of rational thought. |