The BP debacle (was: Need a job??)
in [Golf]
|
Prev: funny thing
Next: Bongo stampede at World Cup
From: Howard Brazee on 9 Jun 2010 21:07 On 09 Jun 2010 22:01:58 GMT, Carbon <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote: >Yes. Bush and his handlers appointed a grossly unqualified cronie to >head up FEMA while folding it into the DHS and stripping it of any >budgetary control. Suddenly you have this important agency with no >budget being run by some clown that no one took seriously. Bush's >bungling was a disaster waiting to happen. Bush also folded it into DHS, giving it responsibility for responding to an attack on our soil. Whether or not this was a good idea, Katrina was a test on how well we would respond to such an attack. -- "In no part of the constitution is more wisdom to be found, than in the clause which confides the question of war or peace to the legislature, and not to the executive department." - James Madison
From: Carbon on 9 Jun 2010 21:44 On Wed, 09 Jun 2010 23:24:14 +0000, Moderate wrote: > Carbon <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote: >> On Wed, 09 Jun 2010 14:40:01 -0500, Moderate wrote: >>> "Jack Hollis" <xsleeper(a)aol.com> wrote in message >>> news:q2qv06laac2tofrd766m75o6mh857d930t(a)4ax.com... >>>> On Wed, 9 Jun 2010 08:36:05 -0700 (PDT), "John B." >>>> <johnb505(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I'm being objective. =A0Bush took a lot of heat for Katrina and >>>>>> Obama's taking a lot of heat for the oil spill. =A0 >>>>> >>>>> No you're not. Bush deserved it and Obama doesn't. >>>> >>>> No, you've got it backwards. Obama deserves it and Bush didn't. >>> >>> Let's be objective. Bush was expected to prevent acts of God. Obama >>> is not accountable for companies the government inspects, approves >>> and regulates. >> >> You are incapable of rational thought. > > Is it rational to hurl insults in every single post? I mostly only do it when you claim to be objective. Newsflash: no one is objective. Especially you.
From: Moderate on 9 Jun 2010 22:45 Carbon <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote: > On Wed, 09 Jun 2010 23:24:14 +0000, Moderate wrote: > > Carbon <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote: > >> On Wed, 09 Jun 2010 14:40:01 -0500, Moderate wrote: > >>> "Jack Hollis" <xsleeper(a)aol.com> wrote in message > >>> news:q2qv06laac2tofrd766m75o6mh857d930t(a)4ax.com... > >>>> On Wed, 9 Jun 2010 08:36:05 -0700 (PDT), "John B." > >>>> <johnb505(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> I'm being objective. =A0Bush took a lot of heat for Katrina and > >>>>>> Obama's taking a lot of heat for the oil spill. =A0 > >>>>> > >>>>> No you're not. Bush deserved it and Obama doesn't. > >>>> > >>>> No, you've got it backwards. Obama deserves it and Bush didn't. > >>> > >>> Let's be objective. Bush was expected to prevent acts of God. > > > > Obama > >>> is not accountable for companies the government inspects, approves > >>> and regulates. > >> > >> You are incapable of rational thought. > > > > Is it rational to hurl insults in every single post? > > I mostly only do it when you claim to be objective. Newsflash: no one > is > objective. Especially you. > That is mostly only not true. The majority of your posts are nothing more than insults.
From: BAR on 10 Jun 2010 06:23 In article <403a3e75-e8e7-4669-b838-8c9cac0e40c6@ 35g2000vbj.googlegroups.com>, johnb505(a)gmail.com says... > > On Jun 9, 7:33�pm, BAR <sc...(a)you.com> wrote: > > In article <clark-C95BA3.08372209062...(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio- > > state.edu>, cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu says... > > > > > > My view is that the President sat on his hands for a month, before approving the sand berms last week. �Governor Jindal's requests were ignored as Obama did nothing. > > > > > So, genius, tell us all how sand berms help with the underwater > > > catastrophe that threatens to wipe out the entire eco-system and food > > > chain on the Gulf floor, and render it completely dead and sterile? Come > > > on, you have been repeatedly asked for a solution > > > > http://oceancurrents.rsmas.miami.edu/atlantic/loop-current.html > > Thanks for this faux demonstration of your erudition, but nothing in > this paper answers the question you were asked. But how would you know > that? You don't even know what it says. You are completely useless John.
From: BAR on 10 Jun 2010 06:32
In article <4c10436d$0$8425$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>, nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com says... > > On Wed, 09 Jun 2010 23:24:14 +0000, Moderate wrote: > > Carbon <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote: > >> On Wed, 09 Jun 2010 14:40:01 -0500, Moderate wrote: > >>> "Jack Hollis" <xsleeper(a)aol.com> wrote in message > >>> news:q2qv06laac2tofrd766m75o6mh857d930t(a)4ax.com... > >>>> On Wed, 9 Jun 2010 08:36:05 -0700 (PDT), "John B." > >>>> <johnb505(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> I'm being objective. =A0Bush took a lot of heat for Katrina and > >>>>>> Obama's taking a lot of heat for the oil spill. =A0 > >>>>> > >>>>> No you're not. Bush deserved it and Obama doesn't. > >>>> > >>>> No, you've got it backwards. Obama deserves it and Bush didn't. > >>> > >>> Let's be objective. Bush was expected to prevent acts of God. Obama > >>> is not accountable for companies the government inspects, approves > >>> and regulates. > >> > >> You are incapable of rational thought. > > > > Is it rational to hurl insults in every single post? > > I mostly only do it when you claim to be objective. Newsflash: no one is > objective. Especially you. Somebody please gently tap the arm of the record player so that it moves to the next grove, it is stuck on this one and we are tired of hearing it being repeated. |