The BP debacle (was: Need a job??)
in [Golf]
|
Prev: funny thing
Next: Bongo stampede at World Cup
From: BAR on 10 Jun 2010 06:40 In article <91a016hkmk5qjbbbvi2s8ji76lihfvm5p7(a)4ax.com>, bknight(a)conramp.net says... > > On Wed, 9 Jun 2010 19:33:18 -0400, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: > > >In article <clark-C95BA3.08372209062010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio- > >state.edu>, clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu says... > >> > My view is that the President sat on his hands for a month, before approving > >> > the sand berms last week. Governor Jindal's requests were ignored as Obama > >> > did nothing. > >> > >> So, genius, tell us all how sand berms help with the underwater > >> catastrophe that threatens to wipe out the entire eco-system and food > >> chain on the Gulf floor, and render it completely dead and sterile? Come > >> on, you have been repeatedly asked for a solution > >> > > > >http://oceancurrents.rsmas.miami.edu/atlantic/loop-current.html > > Ok Greg, now tell us that he shows any reasoning with this. This > link shows nothing relative to the lower depth threat of the oil > spill. He just found a site that he thinks no one will read regarding > currents in the Gulf of Mexico, which is a non-sequitur to Clark's > question. He's pitiful. Bobby your inability to understand that ocean currents not only run on the surface but run at depths is typical of your knee-jerk reaction to facts that you don't want to understand or accept. The water a 3,000 feet below the surface in the Gulf of Mexico is not stagnant. http://www.waterencyclopedia.com/Mi-Oc/Ocean-Currents.html But, I expect that you won't understand this link either.
From: William Clark on 10 Jun 2010 08:01 In article <87ac78Fa2eU1(a)mid.individual.net>, "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote: > "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote in message > news:87ab6rF3uuU1(a)mid.individual.net... > > > > Bert is a one-eyed idiot, who posts partisan nonsense. No surprise that > > > you are his fan-boy, though. It says a lot about you. > > > > You are one of the most partisan people here. > > .....not to mention, ignorant. > > -Greg I think you would actually have to know something, anything, to make a call like that. You fail.
From: William Clark on 10 Jun 2010 08:02 In article <403a3e75-e8e7-4669-b838-8c9cac0e40c6(a)35g2000vbj.googlegroups.com>, "John B." <johnb505(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Jun 9, 7:33�pm, BAR <sc...(a)you.com> wrote: > > In article <clark-C95BA3.08372209062...(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio- > > state.edu>, cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu says... > > > > > > My view is that the President sat on his hands for a month, before > > > > approving the sand berms last week. �Governor Jindal's requests were > > > > ignored as Obama did nothing. > > > > > So, genius, tell us all how sand berms help with the underwater > > > catastrophe that threatens to wipe out the entire eco-system and food > > > chain on the Gulf floor, and render it completely dead and sterile? Come > > > on, you have been repeatedly asked for a solution > > > > http://oceancurrents.rsmas.miami.edu/atlantic/loop-current.html > > Thanks for this faux demonstration of your erudition, but nothing in > this paper answers the question you were asked. But how would you know > that? You don't even know what it says. It's all he could find on the wingnut web blogs. Other than that, he is bereft of any clue.
From: William Clark on 10 Jun 2010 08:04 In article <MPG.267a8b3caa82be5598a03f(a)news.giganews.com>, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: > In article <91a016hkmk5qjbbbvi2s8ji76lihfvm5p7(a)4ax.com>, > bknight(a)conramp.net says... > > > > On Wed, 9 Jun 2010 19:33:18 -0400, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: > > > > >In article <clark-C95BA3.08372209062010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio- > > >state.edu>, clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu says... > > >> > My view is that the President sat on his hands for a month, before > > >> > approving > > >> > the sand berms last week. Governor Jindal's requests were ignored as > > >> > Obama > > >> > did nothing. > > >> > > >> So, genius, tell us all how sand berms help with the underwater > > >> catastrophe that threatens to wipe out the entire eco-system and food > > >> chain on the Gulf floor, and render it completely dead and sterile? Come > > >> on, you have been repeatedly asked for a solution > > >> > > > > > >http://oceancurrents.rsmas.miami.edu/atlantic/loop-current.html > > > > Ok Greg, now tell us that he shows any reasoning with this. This > > link shows nothing relative to the lower depth threat of the oil > > spill. He just found a site that he thinks no one will read regarding > > currents in the Gulf of Mexico, which is a non-sequitur to Clark's > > question. He's pitiful. > > Bobby your inability to understand that ocean currents not only run on > the surface but run at depths is typical of your knee-jerk reaction to > facts that you don't want to understand or accept. The water a 3,000 > feet below the surface in the Gulf of Mexico is not stagnant. > > http://www.waterencyclopedia.com/Mi-Oc/Ocean-Currents.html > > But, I expect that you won't understand this link either. Oh, and you, I suppose, are an expert on ocean currents? We know that the deep water is not stagnant - that is why these undersea plumes are moving across the Gulf. Duh.
From: William Clark on 10 Jun 2010 08:04
In article <huosh3$gk4$1(a)speranza.aioe.org>, "Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> wrote: > "William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in message > news:clark-C2A5C6.16024809062010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > > In article <huono5$7v9$1(a)speranza.aioe.org>, > > "Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> wrote: > > > >> "William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in message > >> news:clark-2731C8.14083209062010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > >> > > >> > OK, so as per usual you evade/miss the point. Cameras and other sensing > >> > systems have already detected massive underwater oil plumes that will > >> > do > >> > far more serious and long term damage than even the oil coming on shore > >> > and into the marshes. Here, go educate yourself: > >> > > >> > http://tiny.cc/p6fv5 > >> > >> According to the article the lower section of the floating plumes contain > >> very low concentration of oil making it less likely for the oil to sweep > >> the > >> gulf floor. > >> > >> The article does not address whether this is more serious than oil in the > >> marshes. > >> > >> We know that Obama waited a month to approve assistance to the marsh > >> areas. > > > > > > So a "six-mile wide, 22 mile long long oil plume" is nothing, is it? And > > that is just one of the plumes that have been spotted. Not to mention > > the fact that the well is still pouring out oil. And you still want to > > bet on it not contaminating the ocean floor? OK, dream on. > > I simply posted information from your source. If you disagree, read your > source. In other words, you are utterly incapable of comprehension. As we all knew. |