Prev: funny thing
Next: Bongo stampede at World Cup
From: John B. on 11 Jun 2010 15:58 On Jun 11, 2:42 pm, Jack Hollis <xslee...(a)aol.com> wrote: > On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 19:37:29 -0500, bkni...(a)conramp.net wrote: > >Its one thing to have intelligence, another to evince it. He came off > >as bumbling, inept and frankly dim-witted. You can talk IQ all you > >want, but if you didn't see the myriads of faux pas he committed > >almost weekly, you were in a coma for eight years. > > >BK > > Bush's difficulties speaking don't come anywhere near what Obama has > done. That's why Obama never speaks without a Teleprompter. > > If you think Bush is dumb because of speaking errors they you have to > conclude that Obama is much dumber. Obama's 57 states outdoes anythng > Bush ever did by far. It is patently false that Obama never speaks without a teleprompter. As for the 57 states remark, you know damn well that it was a slip of the tongue. The fact that you're still hung up on that suggests that you can't point to any gaffes he has made since then. And that was 2 years ago.
From: MNMikeW on 11 Jun 2010 16:34 "John B." <johnb505(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:4624d3e2-ecd8-4989-9f91-8067f02a67db(a)y11g2000yqm.googlegroups.com... On Jun 11, 2:25 pm, "MNMikeW" <MNMiik...(a)aol.com> wrote: > "John B." <johnb...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > news:70314499-6e8e-43e3-b8f9-51de16484453(a)x27g2000yqb.googlegroups.com... > On Jun 11, 11:31 am, "MNMikeW" <MNMiik...(a)aol.com> wrote: > > > > > > > "BAR" <sc...(a)you.com> wrote in message > > >news:MPG.267c143d8c9812ca98a04c(a)news.giganews.com... > > > > In article <b54ecf73-3361-4a00-9970-64785f0cfed8 > > > @x27g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>, johnb...(a)gmail.com says... > > > >> On Jun 10, 9:30 pm, Howard Brazee <how...(a)brazee.net> wrote: > > >> > On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 19:37:29 -0500, bkni...(a)conramp.net wrote: > > >> > >Its one thing to have intelligence, another to evince it. He came > > >> > >off > > >> > >as bumbling, inept and frankly dim-witted. You can talk IQ all you > > >> > >want, but if you didn't see the myriads of faux pas he committed > > >> > >almost weekly, you were in a coma for eight years. > > > >> > Sure. But Obama was the one who mentioned 57 states. > > > >> That was an obvious slip of the tongue. Does anyone actually believe > > >> that Obama thinks there are 57 states? > > > > It is not an obvious slip of the tongue. When you were in school how > > > many states were there? How many stars were in the blue field of the > > > flag and why? How many strips an in the flag and why? These are things > > > that every US citizen should know. It is just like the three branches > > > of > > > government, thow houses in the federal legislature. Some things you > > > should just know. > > > > But, 57 states and not being allowed to visit Alaska and Hawaii? It > > > isn't excusable by any stretch, not for someone running for the office > > > of President of the US. > > > Imagine if Bush had said it. Of course it would have been proof positive > > that Bush was a retard. But of course with Obama, he merely misspoke. If > > it > > wasn't for double standards, the left would have no standards. > > The difference, Mike, is that Obama made this one famous gaffe, > whereas Bush made a million of them. > > =============================== > Like???? I can't believe you don't remember. But here are a few: http://politicalhumor.about.com/library/blbushisms.htm ============ http://politicalhumor.about.com/od/barackobama/a/obama-isms.htm
From: Moderate on 11 Jun 2010 16:48 "John B." <johnb505(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:3652c079-d015-45df-930d-726e5acb5be1(a)s9g2000yqd.googlegroups.com... On Jun 11, 2:42 pm, Jack Hollis <xslee...(a)aol.com> wrote: > On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 19:37:29 -0500, bkni...(a)conramp.net wrote: > >Its one thing to have intelligence, another to evince it. He came off > >as bumbling, inept and frankly dim-witted. You can talk IQ all you > >want, but if you didn't see the myriads of faux pas he committed > >almost weekly, you were in a coma for eight years. > > >BK > > Bush's difficulties speaking don't come anywhere near what Obama has > done. That's why Obama never speaks without a Teleprompter. > > If you think Bush is dumb because of speaking errors they you have to > conclude that Obama is much dumber. Obama's 57 states outdoes anythng > Bush ever did by far. It is patently false that Obama never speaks without a teleprompter. As for the 57 states remark, you know damn well that it was a slip of the tongue. The fact that you're still hung up on that suggests that you can't point to any gaffes he has made since then. And that was 2 years ago. ********************************************************* When Obama misspeaks it is a slip of the tongue. When Bush misspeaks he is an idiot. Admittedly President Bush made a lot of misspeaks, but he was President for eight years. Obama will only have four years to rack them up. That is objectivity.
From: bknight on 11 Jun 2010 16:57 On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 15:48:25 -0500, "Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> wrote: >When Obama misspeaks it is a slip of the tongue. >When Bush misspeaks he is an idiot. Glad you faced up to that. BK
From: John B. on 11 Jun 2010 17:27
On Jun 11, 4:48 pm, "Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> wrote: > "John B." <johnb...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > news:3652c079-d015-45df-930d-726e5acb5be1(a)s9g2000yqd.googlegroups.com... > On Jun 11, 2:42 pm, Jack Hollis <xslee...(a)aol.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 19:37:29 -0500, bkni...(a)conramp.net wrote: > > >Its one thing to have intelligence, another to evince it. He came off > > >as bumbling, inept and frankly dim-witted. You can talk IQ all you > > >want, but if you didn't see the myriads of faux pas he committed > > >almost weekly, you were in a coma for eight years. > > > >BK > > > Bush's difficulties speaking don't come anywhere near what Obama has > > done. That's why Obama never speaks without a Teleprompter. > > > If you think Bush is dumb because of speaking errors they you have to > > conclude that Obama is much dumber. Obama's 57 states outdoes anythng > > Bush ever did by far. > > It is patently false that Obama never speaks without a teleprompter. > As for the 57 states remark, you know damn well that it was a slip of > the tongue. The fact that you're still hung up on that suggests that > you can't point to any gaffes he has made since then. And that was 2 > years ago. > ********************************************************* > > When Obama misspeaks it is a slip of the tongue. > When Bush misspeaks he is an idiot. > > Admittedly President Bush made a lot of misspeaks, but he was President for > eight years. Obama will only have four years to rack them up. > > That is objectivity. That is not objectivity. Obama has made one - repeat, ONE - verbal gaffe. By this point in his administration, Bush had made dozens. And, he was unable to speak intelligently about any subject. |