From: John B. on
On Jun 11, 2:42 pm, Jack Hollis <xslee...(a)aol.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 19:37:29 -0500, bkni...(a)conramp.net wrote:
> >Its one thing to have intelligence, another to evince it.  He came off
> >as  bumbling, inept and frankly dim-witted. You can talk IQ all you
> >want, but if you didn't see the myriads of faux pas he committed
> >almost weekly, you were in a coma for eight years.  
>
> >BK
>
> Bush's difficulties speaking don't come anywhere near what Obama has
> done.  That's why Obama never speaks without a Teleprompter.
>
> If you think Bush is dumb because of speaking errors they you have to
> conclude that Obama is much dumber.  Obama's 57 states outdoes anythng
> Bush ever did by far.

It is patently false that Obama never speaks without a teleprompter.
As for the 57 states remark, you know damn well that it was a slip of
the tongue. The fact that you're still hung up on that suggests that
you can't point to any gaffes he has made since then. And that was 2
years ago.
From: MNMikeW on

"John B." <johnb505(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
news:4624d3e2-ecd8-4989-9f91-8067f02a67db(a)y11g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...
On Jun 11, 2:25 pm, "MNMikeW" <MNMiik...(a)aol.com> wrote:
> "John B." <johnb...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:70314499-6e8e-43e3-b8f9-51de16484453(a)x27g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
> On Jun 11, 11:31 am, "MNMikeW" <MNMiik...(a)aol.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > "BAR" <sc...(a)you.com> wrote in message
>
> >news:MPG.267c143d8c9812ca98a04c(a)news.giganews.com...
>
> > > In article <b54ecf73-3361-4a00-9970-64785f0cfed8
> > > @x27g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>, johnb...(a)gmail.com says...
>
> > >> On Jun 10, 9:30 pm, Howard Brazee <how...(a)brazee.net> wrote:
> > >> > On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 19:37:29 -0500, bkni...(a)conramp.net wrote:
> > >> > >Its one thing to have intelligence, another to evince it. He came
> > >> > >off
> > >> > >as bumbling, inept and frankly dim-witted. You can talk IQ all you
> > >> > >want, but if you didn't see the myriads of faux pas he committed
> > >> > >almost weekly, you were in a coma for eight years.
>
> > >> > Sure. But Obama was the one who mentioned 57 states.
>
> > >> That was an obvious slip of the tongue. Does anyone actually believe
> > >> that Obama thinks there are 57 states?
>
> > > It is not an obvious slip of the tongue. When you were in school how
> > > many states were there? How many stars were in the blue field of the
> > > flag and why? How many strips an in the flag and why? These are things
> > > that every US citizen should know. It is just like the three branches
> > > of
> > > government, thow houses in the federal legislature. Some things you
> > > should just know.
>
> > > But, 57 states and not being allowed to visit Alaska and Hawaii? It
> > > isn't excusable by any stretch, not for someone running for the office
> > > of President of the US.
>
> > Imagine if Bush had said it. Of course it would have been proof positive
> > that Bush was a retard. But of course with Obama, he merely misspoke. If
> > it
> > wasn't for double standards, the left would have no standards.
>
> The difference, Mike, is that Obama made this one famous gaffe,
> whereas Bush made a million of them.
>
> ===============================
> Like????

I can't believe you don't remember. But here are a few:
http://politicalhumor.about.com/library/blbushisms.htm

============
http://politicalhumor.about.com/od/barackobama/a/obama-isms.htm



From: Moderate on

"John B." <johnb505(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
news:3652c079-d015-45df-930d-726e5acb5be1(a)s9g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...
On Jun 11, 2:42 pm, Jack Hollis <xslee...(a)aol.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 19:37:29 -0500, bkni...(a)conramp.net wrote:
> >Its one thing to have intelligence, another to evince it. He came off
> >as bumbling, inept and frankly dim-witted. You can talk IQ all you
> >want, but if you didn't see the myriads of faux pas he committed
> >almost weekly, you were in a coma for eight years.
>
> >BK
>
> Bush's difficulties speaking don't come anywhere near what Obama has
> done. That's why Obama never speaks without a Teleprompter.
>
> If you think Bush is dumb because of speaking errors they you have to
> conclude that Obama is much dumber. Obama's 57 states outdoes anythng
> Bush ever did by far.

It is patently false that Obama never speaks without a teleprompter.
As for the 57 states remark, you know damn well that it was a slip of
the tongue. The fact that you're still hung up on that suggests that
you can't point to any gaffes he has made since then. And that was 2
years ago.
*********************************************************

When Obama misspeaks it is a slip of the tongue.
When Bush misspeaks he is an idiot.

Admittedly President Bush made a lot of misspeaks, but he was President for
eight years. Obama will only have four years to rack them up.

That is objectivity.


From: bknight on
On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 15:48:25 -0500, "Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com>
wrote:

>When Obama misspeaks it is a slip of the tongue.
>When Bush misspeaks he is an idiot.

Glad you faced up to that.

BK
From: John B. on
On Jun 11, 4:48 pm, "Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> wrote:
> "John B." <johnb...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:3652c079-d015-45df-930d-726e5acb5be1(a)s9g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...
> On Jun 11, 2:42 pm, Jack Hollis <xslee...(a)aol.com> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 19:37:29 -0500, bkni...(a)conramp.net wrote:
> > >Its one thing to have intelligence, another to evince it. He came off
> > >as bumbling, inept and frankly dim-witted. You can talk IQ all you
> > >want, but if you didn't see the myriads of faux pas he committed
> > >almost weekly, you were in a coma for eight years.
>
> > >BK
>
> > Bush's difficulties speaking don't come anywhere near what Obama has
> > done. That's why Obama never speaks without a Teleprompter.
>
> > If you think Bush is dumb because of speaking errors they you have to
> > conclude that Obama is much dumber. Obama's 57 states outdoes anythng
> > Bush ever did by far.
>
> It is patently false that Obama never speaks without a teleprompter.
> As for the 57 states remark, you know damn well that it was a slip of
> the tongue. The fact that you're still hung up on that suggests that
> you can't point to any gaffes he has made since then. And that was 2
> years ago.
> *********************************************************
>
> When Obama misspeaks it is a slip of the tongue.
> When Bush misspeaks he is an idiot.
>
> Admittedly President Bush made a lot of misspeaks, but he was President for
> eight years.  Obama will only have four years to rack them up.
>
> That is objectivity.

That is not objectivity. Obama has made one - repeat, ONE - verbal
gaffe. By this point in his administration, Bush had made dozens. And,
he was unable to speak intelligently about any subject.
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59
Prev: funny thing
Next: Bongo stampede at World Cup