The BP debacle (was: Need a job??)
in [Golf]
|
Prev: funny thing
Next: Bongo stampede at World Cup
From: Carbon on 11 Jun 2010 21:05 On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 10:31:22 -0500, MNMikeW wrote: > "BAR" <screw(a)you.com> wrote in message > news:MPG.267c143d8c9812ca98a04c(a)news.giganews.com... >> In article <b54ecf73-3361-4a00-9970-64785f0cfed8 >> @x27g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>, johnb505(a)gmail.com says... >>> On Jun 10, 9:30 pm, Howard Brazee <how...(a)brazee.net> wrote: >>>> On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 19:37:29 -0500, bkni...(a)conramp.net wrote: >>>> >>>>> Its one thing to have intelligence, another to evince it. He came >>>>> off as bumbling, inept and frankly dim-witted. You can talk IQ all >>>>> you want, but if you didn't see the myriads of faux pas he >>>>> committed almost weekly, you were in a coma for eight years. >>>> >>>> Sure. But Obama was the one who mentioned 57 states. >>> >>> That was an obvious slip of the tongue. Does anyone actually believe >>> that Obama thinks there are 57 states? >> >> It is not an obvious slip of the tongue. When you were in school how >> many states were there? How many stars were in the blue field of the >> flag and why? How many strips an in the flag and why? These are things >> that every US citizen should know. It is just like the three branches >> of government, thow houses in the federal legislature. Some things you >> should just know. >> >> But, 57 states and not being allowed to visit Alaska and Hawaii? It >> isn't excusable by any stretch, not for someone running for the office >> of President of the US. > > Imagine if Bush had said it. Of course it would have been proof positive > that Bush was a retard. But of course with Obama, he merely misspoke. If > it wasn't for double standards, the left would have no standards. Not by that alone. There were hundreds, thousands of similar gaffes. You true believers are so desperate to say Obama is as bad or worse. It's ridiculous.
From: Carbon on 11 Jun 2010 21:07 On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 20:21:45 -0400, BAR wrote: >You are a sycophant. What is a sycophant?
From: Carbon on 11 Jun 2010 21:21 On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 19:22:29 -0400, BAR wrote: > In article <4c116eab$0$5019$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>, > nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com says... >> On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 18:27:16 -0400, BAR wrote: >>> In article <6la216t6u94660h3nsocutd6o0cpd26dnk(a)4ax.com>, >>> xsleeper(a)aol.com says... >>>> On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 11:02:07 -0500, bknight(a)conramp.net wrote: On >>>> Thu, 10 Jun 2010 11:45:18 -0400, Jack Hollis <xsleeper(a)aol.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> On Wed, 9 Jun 2010 19:26:48 -0400, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> It really is sad to see a grown man following the lead of >>>>>>> talking head, pundits, and has been movie makers. >>>>>> >>>>>> I looks like Obama's handlers get up in the morning and watch the >>>>>> TV News shows and read the poll numbers and then decide what to >>>>>> tell Obama to say. >>>>> >>>>> If so, its good to have someone in the White House who has the >>>>> intelligence to understand them. We went 8 years without that. >>>> >>>> I doubt that Obama is as smart as Bush. It's possible, but >>>> unlikely. >>> >>> The only reason why we haven't seen Obama's grades from are because >>> Obama doesn't want to be embarrassed like Gore and Kerry were. >> >> Cite. > > Common sense. Got nothin', huh? I am truly shocked.
From: BAR on 12 Jun 2010 08:05 In article <4c12e122$0$12465$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>, nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com says... > > On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 19:22:29 -0400, BAR wrote: > > In article <4c116eab$0$5019$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>, > > nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com says... > >> On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 18:27:16 -0400, BAR wrote: > >>> In article <6la216t6u94660h3nsocutd6o0cpd26dnk(a)4ax.com>, > >>> xsleeper(a)aol.com says... > >>>> On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 11:02:07 -0500, bknight(a)conramp.net wrote: On > >>>> Thu, 10 Jun 2010 11:45:18 -0400, Jack Hollis <xsleeper(a)aol.com> > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>>> On Wed, 9 Jun 2010 19:26:48 -0400, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> It really is sad to see a grown man following the lead of > >>>>>>> talking head, pundits, and has been movie makers. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I looks like Obama's handlers get up in the morning and watch the > >>>>>> TV News shows and read the poll numbers and then decide what to > >>>>>> tell Obama to say. > >>>>> > >>>>> If so, its good to have someone in the White House who has the > >>>>> intelligence to understand them. We went 8 years without that. > >>>> > >>>> I doubt that Obama is as smart as Bush. It's possible, but > >>>> unlikely. > >>> > >>> The only reason why we haven't seen Obama's grades from are because > >>> Obama doesn't want to be embarrassed like Gore and Kerry were. > >> > >> Cite. > > > > Common sense. > > Got nothin', huh? I am truly shocked. Prove me wrong, lets see Obama's grades from Columbia.
From: Carbon on 12 Jun 2010 08:13
On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 08:05:47 -0400, BAR wrote: > In article <4c12e122$0$12465$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>, > nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com says... >> On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 19:22:29 -0400, BAR wrote: >>> In article <4c116eab$0$5019$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>, >>> nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com says... >>>> On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 18:27:16 -0400, BAR wrote: >>>>> In article <6la216t6u94660h3nsocutd6o0cpd26dnk(a)4ax.com>, >>>>> xsleeper(a)aol.com says... >>>>>> On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 11:02:07 -0500, bknight(a)conramp.net wrote: On >>>>>> Thu, 10 Jun 2010 11:45:18 -0400, Jack Hollis <xsleeper(a)aol.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> On Wed, 9 Jun 2010 19:26:48 -0400, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> It really is sad to see a grown man following the lead of >>>>>>>>> talking head, pundits, and has been movie makers. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I looks like Obama's handlers get up in the morning and watch >>>>>>>> the TV News shows and read the poll numbers and then decide >>>>>>>> what to tell Obama to say. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If so, its good to have someone in the White House who has the >>>>>>> intelligence to understand them. We went 8 years without that. >>>>>> >>>>>> I doubt that Obama is as smart as Bush. It's possible, but >>>>>> unlikely. >>>>> >>>>> The only reason why we haven't seen Obama's grades from are >>>>> because Obama doesn't want to be embarrassed like Gore and Kerry >>>>> were. >>>> >>>> Cite. >>> >>> Common sense. >> >> Got nothin', huh? I am truly shocked. > > Prove me wrong, lets see Obama's grades from Columbia. Would you also like me to prove that the earth is not flat? |