Tiger Woods hires Ari Fleischer
in [Golf]
|
Prev: Tommy two gloves
Next: Atlanta area golf courses?
From: William Clark on 19 Mar 2010 13:41 In article <hnvvat$589$1(a)speranza.aioe.org>, "Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> wrote: > "William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in message > news:clark-14EE76.08075319032010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > > In article <4ba3502d$0$26945$bbae4d71(a)news.suddenlink.net>, > > > > Nice one - trying to lie your way out of claiming I had no publications, > > and then going oh so quiet when I put down a $5K challenge for every 50 > > I could produce. Feigning ignorance because you think your original post > > has rolled off everyone's newsreaders by now is the height of dishonesty. > > I recall posting about you not being published. I won't deny that. I still > haven't seen any evidence that you have. Well, in the spirit of ol' Dino, I challenged you to put $5K down for every 50 publications I could produce. Come on, surely you are good for that?
From: MNMikeW on 19 Mar 2010 13:51 "William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in message news:clark-48E375.13393319032010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > In article <80hj0qFfpmU1(a)mid.individual.net>, > "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > >> "William Clark" <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in message >> news:wclark2-0F750A.19164218032010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... >> > In article <MPG.260c78c2781469d1989cf3(a)news.giganews.com>, >> > BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: >> > >> >> In article <wclark2-DF300B.18392718032010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio- >> >> state.edu>, wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com says... >> >> > >> >> > In article <80fi2iFnmU1(a)mid.individual.net>, >> >> > "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: >> >> > >> >> > > "William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in >> >> > > message >> >> > > news:clark-585214.16035418032010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... >> >> > > > In article <MPG.260bdd8664c3668e989ceb(a)news.giganews.com>, >> >> > > > BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: >> >> > > > >> >> > > >> In article >> >> > > >> <wclark2-A8E0DF.21214917032010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio- >> >> > > >> state.edu>, wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com says... >> >> > > >> > >> >> > > >> > In article <f3t2q5tni7fc1evjg4glb5h58tocubi2rq(a)4ax.com>, >> >> > > >> > Howard Brazee <howard(a)brazee.net> wrote: >> >> > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > On Wed, 17 Mar 2010 08:57:07 -0400, BAR <screw(a)you.com> >> >> > > >> > > wrote: >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > >> > > >> Because it clearly irritates the hell out of you to be >> >> > > >> > > >> reminded >> >> > > >> > > >> that >> >> > > >> > > >> your party faithful idolize such an ill-equipped dingbat >> >> > > >> > > >> :=) >> >> > > >> > > > >> >> > > >> > > >Are you talking about the Democrats and Obama? There sure >> >> > > >> > > >is >> >> > > >> > > >quite a >> >> > > >> > > >bit >> >> > > >> > > >of buyers remorse going around ever since Obama took the >> >> > > >> > > >oath >> >> > > >> > > >of >> >> > > >> > > >office. >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > >> > > Sure the Democrats are upset that we didn't get the >> >> > > >> > > promised >> >> > > >> > > change. >> >> > > >> > > But the Republican press is doing everything they can to >> >> > > >> > > convince >> >> > > >> > > moderates that the Right wing is crazy. >> >> > > >> > >> >> > > >> > However, unfortunately for the GoP, the loony fringe is >> >> > > >> > running >> >> > > >> > the >> >> > > >> > show. >> >> > > >> >> >> > > >> The only conclusion is that Democrats in Congress and the White >> >> > > >> House >> >> > > >> are incompetent. How else can the loony fringe from the right >> >> > > >> be >> >> > > >> besting >> >> > > >> them every step of the way? >> >> > > > >> >> > > > They are not, They are just misusing loopholes in procedures for >> >> > > > the >> >> > > > sole purpose of impeding the legislative program of an elected >> >> > > > majority. >> >> > > >> >> > > LOL!! I remember when dissent was patriotic. Well, when the Dems >> >> > > were >> >> > > the >> >> > > minority that is. >> >> > >> >> > Dissent involves constructive alternatives, not simply blindly >> >> > trying >> >> > anything just to make an opponent fail. >> >> >> >> Not if you are happy with the status quo. >> > >> > No, you have to provide a constructive alternative. Not just try to >> > destroy. >> >> That's been done. You choose to ignore it just like the Dems. > > Oh, really, when was that? As you often say Clark, "Google is your friend".
From: Moderate on 19 Mar 2010 13:58 "William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in message news:clark-B66F28.13412119032010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > In article <hnvvat$589$1(a)speranza.aioe.org>, > "Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> wrote: > >> "William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in message >> news:clark-14EE76.08075319032010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... >> > In article <4ba3502d$0$26945$bbae4d71(a)news.suddenlink.net>, >> > >> > Nice one - trying to lie your way out of claiming I had no >> > publications, >> > and then going oh so quiet when I put down a $5K challenge for every 50 >> > I could produce. Feigning ignorance because you think your original >> > post >> > has rolled off everyone's newsreaders by now is the height of >> > dishonesty. >> >> I recall posting about you not being published. I won't deny that. I >> still >> haven't seen any evidence that you have. > > Well, in the spirit of ol' Dino, I challenged you to put $5K down for > every 50 publications I could produce. Come on, surely you are good for > that? Not interested. I am certain you will come up with some last minute excuse as to why you weren't wrong, just like you did with Dene.
From: William Clark on 19 Mar 2010 16:38 In article <80hrsgF5dmU1(a)mid.individual.net>, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > "William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in message > news:clark-48E375.13393319032010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > > In article <80hj0qFfpmU1(a)mid.individual.net>, > > "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > > > >> "William Clark" <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in message > >> news:wclark2-0F750A.19164218032010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > >> > In article <MPG.260c78c2781469d1989cf3(a)news.giganews.com>, > >> > BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: > >> > > >> >> In article <wclark2-DF300B.18392718032010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio- > >> >> state.edu>, wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com says... > >> >> > > >> >> > In article <80fi2iFnmU1(a)mid.individual.net>, > >> >> > "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > >> >> > > >> >> > > "William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in > >> >> > > message > >> >> > > news:clark-585214.16035418032010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > >> >> > > > In article <MPG.260bdd8664c3668e989ceb(a)news.giganews.com>, > >> >> > > > BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > >> In article > >> >> > > >> <wclark2-A8E0DF.21214917032010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio- > >> >> > > >> state.edu>, wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com says... > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > >> > In article <f3t2q5tni7fc1evjg4glb5h58tocubi2rq(a)4ax.com>, > >> >> > > >> > Howard Brazee <howard(a)brazee.net> wrote: > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > >> > > On Wed, 17 Mar 2010 08:57:07 -0400, BAR <screw(a)you.com> > >> >> > > >> > > wrote: > >> >> > > >> > > > >> >> > > >> > > >> Because it clearly irritates the hell out of you to be > >> >> > > >> > > >> reminded > >> >> > > >> > > >> that > >> >> > > >> > > >> your party faithful idolize such an ill-equipped dingbat > >> >> > > >> > > >> :=) > >> >> > > >> > > > > >> >> > > >> > > >Are you talking about the Democrats and Obama? There sure > >> >> > > >> > > >is > >> >> > > >> > > >quite a > >> >> > > >> > > >bit > >> >> > > >> > > >of buyers remorse going around ever since Obama took the > >> >> > > >> > > >oath > >> >> > > >> > > >of > >> >> > > >> > > >office. > >> >> > > >> > > > >> >> > > >> > > Sure the Democrats are upset that we didn't get the > >> >> > > >> > > promised > >> >> > > >> > > change. > >> >> > > >> > > But the Republican press is doing everything they can to > >> >> > > >> > > convince > >> >> > > >> > > moderates that the Right wing is crazy. > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > >> > However, unfortunately for the GoP, the loony fringe is > >> >> > > >> > running > >> >> > > >> > the > >> >> > > >> > show. > >> >> > > >> > >> >> > > >> The only conclusion is that Democrats in Congress and the White > >> >> > > >> House > >> >> > > >> are incompetent. How else can the loony fringe from the right > >> >> > > >> be > >> >> > > >> besting > >> >> > > >> them every step of the way? > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > They are not, They are just misusing loopholes in procedures for > >> >> > > > the > >> >> > > > sole purpose of impeding the legislative program of an elected > >> >> > > > majority. > >> >> > > > >> >> > > LOL!! I remember when dissent was patriotic. Well, when the Dems > >> >> > > were > >> >> > > the > >> >> > > minority that is. > >> >> > > >> >> > Dissent involves constructive alternatives, not simply blindly > >> >> > trying > >> >> > anything just to make an opponent fail. > >> >> > >> >> Not if you are happy with the status quo. > >> > > >> > No, you have to provide a constructive alternative. Not just try to > >> > destroy. > >> > >> That's been done. You choose to ignore it just like the Dems. > > > > Oh, really, when was that? > > > As you often say Clark, "Google is your friend". But clearly not yours.
From: William Clark on 19 Mar 2010 16:39
In article <ho0e08$4ag$1(a)speranza.aioe.org>, "Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> wrote: > "William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in message > news:clark-B66F28.13412119032010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > > In article <hnvvat$589$1(a)speranza.aioe.org>, > > "Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> wrote: > > > >> "William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in message > >> news:clark-14EE76.08075319032010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > >> > In article <4ba3502d$0$26945$bbae4d71(a)news.suddenlink.net>, > >> > > >> > Nice one - trying to lie your way out of claiming I had no > >> > publications, > >> > and then going oh so quiet when I put down a $5K challenge for every 50 > >> > I could produce. Feigning ignorance because you think your original > >> > post > >> > has rolled off everyone's newsreaders by now is the height of > >> > dishonesty. > >> > >> I recall posting about you not being published. I won't deny that. I > >> still > >> haven't seen any evidence that you have. > > > > Well, in the spirit of ol' Dino, I challenged you to put $5K down for > > every 50 publications I could produce. Come on, surely you are good for > > that? > > Not interested. I am certain you will come up with some last minute excuse > as to why you weren't wrong, just like you did with Dene. No, I will simply produce the 50 (times "x") publications necessary to relieve you of your $5K, and give it to charity. You, on the other hand .. . . |