From: MNMikeW on

"Dave B" <debco99(a)hm.com> wrote in message
news:hig866hlmfvd9qd09c0ak32nrb164ljk59(a)4ax.com...
> On Thu, 12 Aug 2010 10:15:33 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com>
> wrote:
>
>>Yes. They are both full of themselves.
>
> Who Clark and Obama?
> db

Clark to. ;-)


From: Moderate on

"MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote in message
news:8cis0aFck7U1(a)mid.individual.net...
>
> Yes Clark, we get it. Any criticism of Tiger or Obama is racist. The
> liberal mantra.

Any discussion with a liberal follows the same pattern.

"You are a racist," "It is Bush's fault."

They seem to be easily trained.


From: Moderate on

"dugjustdug" <prestigerealty(a)yvn.com> wrote in message
news:54cd7af4-c123-4190-beab-3f34f56b003d(a)l6g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
On Aug 12, 9:35 am, "MNMikeW" <MNMiik...(a)aol.com> wrote:
> It was simply Clarks lame attempt to play the race card. AGAIN.

Oh, I know that. ;-) But, I think he's too smart a guy to use that
silly tactic. Whether you agree or disagree with his opinion on
things, he tends to think his positions out. This ploy is below him.
********************************************************

He parrots everything Carbon says. Woof!


From: Moderate on

"MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote in message
news:8ciuovFtgeU1(a)mid.individual.net...
>
> "William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in message
> news:clark-D124B7.14410212082010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu...
>> In article <8cis29Fd0bU1(a)mid.individual.net>,
>> "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote:
>>
>>> "dugjustdug" <prestigerealty(a)yvn.com> wrote in message
>>> news:54cd7af4-c123-4190-beab-3f34f56b003d(a)l6g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
>>> On Aug 12, 9:35 am, "MNMikeW" <MNMiik...(a)aol.com> wrote:
>>> > It was simply Clarks lame attempt to play the race card. AGAIN.
>>>
>>> Oh, I know that. ;-) But, I think he's too smart a guy to use that
>>> silly tactic. Whether you agree or disagree with his opinion on
>>> things, he tends to think his positions out. This ploy is below him.
>>>
>>> ========================
>>> He uses that tactic all the time. It's the only card he has in his deck.
>>
>> At least my deck is full.
>
> You keep telling yourself that.

Most people remove the Joker from the deck.


From: William Clark on
In article <i41jql$7d7$1(a)speranza.aioe.org>,
"Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> wrote:

> "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote in message
> news:8ciuovFtgeU1(a)mid.individual.net...
> >
> > "William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in message
> > news:clark-D124B7.14410212082010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu...
> >> In article <8cis29Fd0bU1(a)mid.individual.net>,
> >> "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> "dugjustdug" <prestigerealty(a)yvn.com> wrote in message
> >>> news:54cd7af4-c123-4190-beab-3f34f56b003d(a)l6g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
> >>> On Aug 12, 9:35 am, "MNMikeW" <MNMiik...(a)aol.com> wrote:
> >>> > It was simply Clarks lame attempt to play the race card. AGAIN.
> >>>
> >>> Oh, I know that. ;-) But, I think he's too smart a guy to use that
> >>> silly tactic. Whether you agree or disagree with his opinion on
> >>> things, he tends to think his positions out. This ploy is below him.
> >>>
> >>> ========================
> >>> He uses that tactic all the time. It's the only card he has in his deck.
> >>
> >> At least my deck is full.
> >
> > You keep telling yourself that.
>
> Most people remove the Joker from the deck.

Then we would no longer have you around, would we? On second thoughts,
maybe that's not such a bad idea . . . .