From: William Clark on
In article <8ciutcFudnU1(a)mid.individual.net>,
"MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote:

> "Dave B" <debco99(a)hm.com> wrote in message
> news:hig866hlmfvd9qd09c0ak32nrb164ljk59(a)4ax.com...
> > On Thu, 12 Aug 2010 10:15:33 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >>Yes. They are both full of themselves.
> >
> > Who Clark and Obama?
> > db
>
> Clark to. ;-)

I think you mean "too". But don't let a little grammar spoil the day -
after all, your hero Dubya made a living out of trashing it.
From: Carbon on
On Thu, 12 Aug 2010 14:56:08 -0500, Moderate wrote:
> "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote in message
> news:8cis0aFck7U1(a)mid.individual.net...
>
>> Yes Clark, we get it. Any criticism of Tiger or Obama is racist. The
>> liberal mantra.
>
> Any discussion with a liberal follows the same pattern.
>
> "You are a racist," "It is Bush's fault."
>
> They seem to be easily trained.

I salute your willingness to go down that road when nearly everything
you say is a witless platitude.
From: Frank Ketchum on

"dugjustdug" <prestigerealty(a)yvn.com> wrote in message
news:54cd7af4-c123-4190-beab-3f34f56b003d(a)l6g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
On Aug 12, 9:35 am, "MNMikeW" <MNMiik...(a)aol.com> wrote:
> It was simply Clarks lame attempt to play the race card. AGAIN.

Oh, I know that. ;-) But, I think he's too smart a guy to use that
silly tactic. Whether you agree or disagree with his opinion on
things, he tends to think his positions out. This ploy is below him.

- - -

Then why is it his only answer to anything? You might want to re-examine
his "positions".


From: Frank Ketchum on

"William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in message
news:clark-60321A.11042912082010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu...
> In article <aiv76651l2ausjsev1etdbahk4hg66e738(a)4ax.com>,
> bknight(a)conramp.net wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 12 Aug 2010 05:44:59 -0600, Howard Brazee <howard(a)brazee.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >On Thu, 12 Aug 2010 06:40:58 -0400, Horvath1758(a)net.net wrote:
>> >
>> >>>I personally hope he misses the cut, Pavin does not select him and he
>> >>>sits
>> >>>out the rest of the year. I am tired of the Tiger show.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>I agree. I think he's washed up. Stick a fork in him, he's done.
>> >
>> >As a bad player, I'm fascinated when David Duval is contending. My
>> >fantasies like it when someone gets bad and then good again.
>> >
>> >Whenever Tiger gets his head together he will be worth watching again.
>>
>> True. What I can't fathom is hoping that someone plays badly. Then,
>> I don't harbor hatred or animosity, for those way more talented than
>> most.
>>
>> BK
>
> It's like those who simply wish Obama to fail, as opposed to rationally
> opposing policies they don;t like. Obama, Tiger, do we sense one factor
> common to both of them here? Hmmm.


What you fail to note is that I am a Tiger fan.
Don't let facts interfere with your conclusions.


From: bknight on
On Thu, 12 Aug 2010 20:38:36 -0400, "Frank Ketchum"
<nospam(a)thanksanyway.fu> wrote:

>
>"William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in message
>news:clark-60321A.11042912082010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu...

>>
>> It's like those who simply wish Obama to fail, as opposed to rationally
>> opposing policies they don;t like. Obama, Tiger, do we sense one factor
>> common to both of them here? Hmmm.

I'm not so sure that this is true across the board.
>
>
>What you fail to note is that I am a Tiger fan.
>Don't let facts interfere with your conclusions.
>
Last night you wrote:

>>I personally hope he misses the cut, Pavin does not select him and he sits
>>out the rest of the year. I am tired of the Tiger show.

Somehow that doesn't register as a Tiger fan Frank.

BK