Tom Tancredo
in [Golf]
|
From: MNMikeW on 15 Feb 2010 12:20 "William Clark" <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in message news:wclark2-B3D61E.12232213022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > In article > <b33ef4c0-206d-44a8-a5b2-84e3e97ccad8(a)h2g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>, > Dinosaur_Sr <frostback2002(a)att.net> wrote: > >> On Feb 13, 10:39 am, William Clark <wcla...(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> >> wrote: >> > In article >> > <6ea6aa0b-dd0f-4933-bfd0-2b763861e...(a)b2g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>, >> > >> > >> > >> > Dinosaur_Sr <frostback2...(a)att.net> wrote: >> > > On Feb 12, 2:01 pm, William Clark <cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio- >> > > state.edu> wrote: >> > > > In article <7tljlbFg5...(a)mid.individual.net>, >> > >> > > > "dene" <d...(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote: >> > > > > "William Clark" <cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in >> > > > > message >> > > > >news:clark-13ED1E.09503912022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... >> > > > > > In article <hl3k94$33...(a)speranza.aioe.org>, >> > > > > > "Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> wrote: >> > >> > > > > > > "dene" <d...(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote in message >> > > > > > >news:7tjvqjFuvU1(a)mid.individual.net... >> > >> > > > > > > > "William Clark" <wcla...(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in >> > > > > > > > message >> > > > > > > >news:wclark2-C14662.20553411022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.ed >> > > > > > > >u... >> > >> > > > > > > >> Oh, bullshit, Jack. We've been over that again and again - >> > > > > > > >> he's as >> > > > > dumb >> > > > > > > >> as paint. >> > >> > > > > > > > Hmmm....what does that say about the intelligence of Gore, >> > > > > > > > Kerry, or >> > > > > the >> > > > > > > > American electorate who elected this dummy. >> > >> > > > > > > I always enjoy watching idiots like Clark talk about other >> > > > > > > people's >> > > > > > > intelligence. What a boob. >> > >> > > > > > Yu and Intelligence don;t belong in the same sentence. Go find >> > > > > > some. >> > >> > > > > I'm waiting for an intelligent answer to my question, Clark. >> > >> > > > > -Greg >> > >> > > > Well, Bush is the one they elected (supposedly), so it is a >> > > > frightening >> > > > indictment of the Americn electorate. >> > >> > > Hardly in the same league as electing any Labour Party candidate in >> > > any context! >> > >> > Get back on your meds - quickly. >> >> So you agree with me that electing Labour party candidates is a >> frightening indictment of the British electorate. > > No, I agree that you need to start taking your medication again. You are > becoming delusionally schizophrenic. Classic Clark denial.
From: MNMikeW on 15 Feb 2010 12:22 "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote in message news:7tnausFr8tU1(a)mid.individual.net... > > "William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in message > news:clark-880F44.14010212022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... >> In article <7tljlbFg5aU1(a)mid.individual.net>, >> "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote: >> >> > "William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in message >> > news:clark-13ED1E.09503912022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... >> > > In article <hl3k94$337$1(a)speranza.aioe.org>, >> > > "Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> wrote: >> > > >> > > > "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote in message >> > > > news:7tjvqjFuvU1(a)mid.individual.net... >> > > > > >> > > > > "William Clark" <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in message >> > > > > > news:wclark2-C14662.20553411022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... >> > > > >> >> > > > >> Oh, bullshit, Jack. We've been over that again and again - he's > as >> > dumb >> > > > >> as paint. >> > > > > >> > > > > Hmmm....what does that say about the intelligence of Gore, Kerry, > or >> > the >> > > > > American electorate who elected this dummy. >> > > > >> > > > I always enjoy watching idiots like Clark talk about other people's >> > > > intelligence. What a boob. >> > > >> > > Yu and Intelligence don;t belong in the same sentence. Go find some. >> > >> > I'm waiting for an intelligent answer to my question, Clark. >> > >> > -Greg >> >> Well, Bush is the one they elected (supposedly), so it is a frightening >> indictment of the Americn electorate. > > Exactly why do you live here, Clark? > > -Greg > > To give America the perfect example of a pompous British asshat.
From: assimilate on 15 Feb 2010 12:28 On 15-Feb-2010, Carbon <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote: > > Perhaps because his numbers didn't bounce due to it? IMO, people are > > starting to tire with O precisely because he is all talk, so his talk > > fails to move any longer. > > First he's so incoherent he can't get by without a teleprompter, and now > he's all talk. Which is it? I'm not sure where your incomprehension comes from. The two concepts are not mutually exclusive. He is all talk, IOW, he promises large and delivers nothing. This is exactly what "the rubes" that voted for him are finding out. He is alleged to be a great speaker when properly prepared and prompted. I have never thought so, because, to me, a great speaker has to have great content; Obama has never had content, but he says nothing better than anyone else I've ever heard. -- bill-o
From: MNMikeW on 15 Feb 2010 12:29 "William Clark" <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in message news:wclark2-FC3F01.10380213022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > In article <MPG.25dfa9bb46dfe5e2989bab(a)news.giganews.com>, > BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: > >> In article <clark-D77901.17405412022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio- >> state.edu>, clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu says... >> > >> > In article >> > <3cebfbd0-3631-4c3a-a13d-daa58a9cda12(a)q27g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>, >> > Dinosaur_Sr <frostback2002(a)att.net> wrote: >> > >> > > On Feb 12, 11:12 am, assimil...(a)borg.org wrote: >> > > > On 12-Feb-2010, William Clark >> > > > <cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> >> > > > wrote: >> > > > >> > > > > > >Oh, bullshit, Jack. We've been over that again and again - >> > > > > > >he's as >> > > > > > >dumb >> > > > >> > > > > > >as paint. >> > > > >> > > > > > I can't wait to see your Yale degree or your Harvard degree. >> > > > >> > > > > Actually, it's from Oxford. Game, set, and match. >> > > > >> > > > it is a piece of paper & will not substitute for wisdom or >> > > > character. >> > > > >> > > > -- >> > > > bill-o >> > > >> > > Oxford is no big deal anyways. 3 years to get a Ph.D. You go to a >> > > lecture now and then and write some sort of paper at the end of the >> > > year and if the good ole boys like it, you advance. Totally lame, and >> > > outdated, at least in science. An Ohio State Ph.D. in science >> > > prepares >> > > you 1000X better than does Oxford. >> > >> > Now you are really showing yourself to be dumb. Grow up. >> >> How many years of formal schooling have you had from the time you >> completed your secondary education? Being punked out as doctoral >> candidate does count. > > What in the world are you talking about? By this apparent criterion, > Palin's multi-year meanderings around six minor universities and > community colleges would qualify her as educated - which she clearly is > not. "that means your life is devoted to trying (unsuccessfully) to tear down anyone with even modest achievements in life. How very sad."
From: MNMikeW on 15 Feb 2010 12:29
"Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message news:4b75ea2a$0$21064$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... > On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 06:40:46 +0000, assimilate wrote: >> On 11-Feb-2010, William Clark <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> >> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Fact is the TEA party convention drew far fewer people than >>>>> anticipated, and even with Fox News cheerleading it for all it was >>>>> worth, it was pretty much a bust for anyone other than the loony >>>>> right rednecks. >>>> >>>> that's because the convention is not reflective of the nature of the >>>> movement, which is a bottom-up, decentralized affair. >>> >>> Right. With crib notes scrawled on the palm of your hand. I get it. >> >> Get your jolies while you can, 2010 will be ugly for you lefties. > > You know Bill, I think you're right. But Obama will still win a second > term. Sounds like a bet? |