Tom Tancredo
in [Golf]
|
From: MNMikeW on 15 Feb 2010 12:30 "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message news:4b75eb36$0$5121$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... > On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 07:36:08 -0600, MNMikeW wrote: >> "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message >> news:4b749767$0$5110$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... >>> On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 17:21:30 -0600, MNMikeW wrote: >>>> "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message >>>> news:4b748e2c$0$5095$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... >>>>> On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 12:51:42 -0600, MNMikeW wrote: >>>>>> <bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message >>>>>> news:eni8n5d2ni49tgp0j8pd0dc4p0jroki97j(a)4ax.com... >>>>>>> On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 12:58:12 -0500, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> In article <sof8n5drfaqjkerbbv1ubt2f5ts6ta5i8l(a)4ax.com>, >>>>>>>> bknight(a)conramp.net says... >>>>>>>>> On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 11:21:44 -0500, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> In article <nta8n5p2g17si7haj18qn7kif0vi0k4kre(a)4ax.com>, >>>>>>>>>> bknight(a)conramp.net says... >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 10:04:37 -0500, BAR <screw(a)you.com> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> The TelePrompter "BS" hasn't been wiped off the table. Obama >>>>>>>>>>>> has a long way to go before he can claim to be weaned off of >>>>>>>>>>>> the TelePrompter. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Cripes Bert. Didn't you see the whipping he gave the repub >>>>>>>>>>> congressmen, all off the cuff? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> In your dreams only. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Enough so that the Senators don't want to be embarrassed too. >>>>>>>>> They won't subject themselves to such a drubbing. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> In your dreams only. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Bert! This has been widely publicized. He offered to meet with >>>>>>> them and they said no, not as a large group, just with a few of >>>>>>> the leaders. They obviously don't want a repeat of the >>>>>>> representatives' poor showing. >>>>>> >>>>>> And the only people saying it was a "drubbing" are left wing >>>>>> blogs. The meeting they want to have on the 25th is just as >>>>>> bogus. Obama has stated he has no plans on starting over on >>>>>> healthcare. So whatever proposals are presented by the Repubs, >>>>>> they will be rejected. The people want a "do-over" on this and so >>>>>> do most Repubs. Obama will not allow that so basically it comes >>>>>> down to nothing more than more Obama Kabuki theater. >>>>> >>>>> Jesus. You guys say you've watched it. Are you all blind, or what? >>>> >>>> We dont have blinders on like you. >>> >>> No, Mike. According to the ceaseless Fox News narrative, Obama is >>> helpless without a teleprompter. He debated the GOP for over an hour, >>> all of them lined up with prepared questions. Not only did he not >>> fall apart, he gave no ground whatsoever. In fact he did very well. >>> It's that simple. The entire narrative is ridiculous and stupid. >> >> I said he did very well. He by no means "drubbed" anyone. > > I'm glad you conceded that much. Most of your fellow travelers are in > denial. As for how well he did, I'm 100% certain that the GOP will > never, ever invite Obama to another unscripted live television debate. > Read into that what you will. There is nothing Obama does that is unscripted.
From: MNMikeW on 15 Feb 2010 12:33 "William Clark" <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in message news:wclark2-FBDC21.12282913022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > In article > <b19f4efa-7bb1-4b8f-a32b-cda057bc9fc7(a)g28g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>, > Dinosaur_Sr <frostback2002(a)att.net> wrote: > >> On Feb 13, 10:39 am, William Clark <wcla...(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> >> wrote: >> > In article >> > <5e353fb8-3c85-4195-9a10-94a54f990...(a)u9g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>, >> > >> > >> > >> > Dinosaur_Sr <frostback2...(a)att.net> wrote: >> > > On Feb 12, 11:32 am, William Clark <cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio- >> > > state.edu> wrote: >> > > > In article >> > > > <3cebfbd0-3631-4c3a-a13d-daa58a9cd...(a)q27g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>, >> > >> > > > Dinosaur_Sr <frostback2...(a)att.net> wrote: >> > > > > On Feb 12, 11:12 am, assimil...(a)borg.org wrote: >> > > > > > On 12-Feb-2010, William Clark >> > > > > > <cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> >> > > > > > wrote: >> > >> > > > > > > > >Oh, bullshit, Jack. We've been over that again and again - >> > > > > > > > >he's as >> > > > > > > > >dumb >> > >> > > > > > > > >as paint. >> > >> > > > > > > > I can't wait to see your Yale degree or your Harvard >> > > > > > > > degree. >> > >> > > > > > > Actually, it's from Oxford. Game, set, and match. >> > >> > > > > > it is a piece of paper & will not substitute for wisdom or >> > > > > > character. >> > >> > > > > > -- >> > > > > > bill-o >> > >> > > > > Oxford is no big deal anyways. 3 years to get a Ph.D. You go to a >> > > > > lecture now and then and write some sort of paper at the end of >> > > > > the >> > > > > year and if the good ole boys like it, you advance. Totally lame, >> > > > > and >> > > > > outdated, at least in science. An Ohio State Ph.D. in science >> > > > > prepares >> > > > > you 1000X better than does Oxford. >> > >> > > > Of course. Except that Oxford doesn't give Ph. Ds, it gives D. >> > > > Phils. >> > > > Can't expect you to know that, though, just like your "materials >> > > > science" journal publications. You are a self proclaimed expert on >> > > > everything, and master of nothing. >> > >> > > I suppose you need BS like that to fall back on when all else has >> > > been lost! No doubt they don't give B.Sc's either, they give "Science >> > > Baccalaureates"! >> > >> > Dino, this is simply pathetic - even for you. >> >> Really? Again, if that sort of BS is all you got to fall back on, you >> are the one who is pathetic. I'm not claiming anything other than >> Oxford is, and has been no big deal in science for quite some time, >> which is a fact to me. > > Well, that might warrant a rebuttal if it came from a scientist, but > from someone with no funded research and only eight "publications", it > is like having a gnat land on your neck. Swatted away in a second. Sad > again. "that means your life is devoted to trying (unsuccessfully) to tear down anyone with even modest achievements in life. How very sad."
From: MNMikeW on 15 Feb 2010 12:34 "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message news:4b75ed2d$0$5077$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... > On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 07:34:03 -0600, MNMikeW wrote: >> "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message >> news:4b7494aa$0$31017$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... >>> On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 10:14:21 -0800, dene wrote: >>>> "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote in message >>>> news:7tiptpFq3qU1(a)mid.individual.net... >>>>> <bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message >>>>> news:nta8n5p2g17si7haj18qn7kif0vi0k4kre(a)4ax.com... >>>>>> On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 10:04:37 -0500, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> The TelePrompter "BS" hasn't been wiped off the table. Obama has >>>>>>> a long way to go before he can claim to be weaned off of the >>>>>>> TelePrompter. >>>>>>> >>>>>> Cripes Bert. Didn't you see the whipping he gave the repub >>>>>> congressmen, all off the cuff? >>>>> >>>>> Whipping is subjective. >>>> >>>> Agree. Saw the whole thing. Both sides rose to the occasion and it >>>> was a healthy exchange. "Whipping" is a gross overstatement. >>> >>> The GOP lined up for an hour and asked him prepared question after >>> prepared question. They gained no ground whatsoever. Call it whatever >>> you want. The Republicans know what happened and will never invite >>> him to another debate like this again. >> >> Pulhleese. Like they're scared of Obama. > > They are now. You keep telling yourself that Carbs.
From: MNMikeW on 15 Feb 2010 12:35 "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message news:4b75ed61$0$5077$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... > On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 07:41:27 -0600, MNMikeW wrote: >> <assimilate(a)borg.org> wrote in message >> news:uE6dn.71265$RS6.56746(a)newsfe15.iad... >>> On 11-Feb-2010, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Obama desperately needs the Palin distraction. As long as his allies >>>> in the liberal press talk about Palin 24/7 it detracts from his >>>> miserable polling numbers. Not to mention his socialist takeover of >>>> the US. >>> >>> nothing else would explain the obession with someone out of public >>> office for 6-9 months >> >> Yes funny they are not all over the Edwards circus. Oh, that's right, >> he's a Democrat. > > He's a has-been. Your hypocrisy is astounding.
From: MNMikeW on 15 Feb 2010 12:38
"Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message news:4b76cdc7$0$5096$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... > On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 07:18:11 -0600, Moderate wrote: >> "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message >> news:4b7497cf$0$5110$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... >>> On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 15:19:44 -0800, dene wrote: >>>> <bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message >>>> news:heu8n5t5m6bopoc55sburstujj9897ii1t(a)4ax.com... >>>>> On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 13:31:23 -0800 (PST), Dinosaur_Sr >>>>> <frostback2002(a)att.net> wrote: >>>> >>>>> You're kidding. Biden wasted Palin in debate, and he's a >>>>> lightweight. She's a joke that is riding a wave of simple minds. >>>> >>>> In your dreams. Palin did just fine with Blabben. >>> >>> She was drilled night and day going into the debate and managed to >>> repeat a bunch of memorized sound bites, mostly without embarrassing >>> herself. It's not like she did well. >> >> Well I guess that qualifies her to be President. Obama is nothing >> more than a talking head. He is the Commander in Chief, yet he >> doesn't know what a Corpsman is. > > Watch the recent live unscripted debate between Obama and the GOP. ....but conveniently ignore other stupid things he does.... |