From: William Clark on
In article <4b79e07b$0$4847$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>,
Carbon <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote:

> On Mon, 15 Feb 2010 11:40:01 -0600, MNMikeW wrote:
> > "William Clark" <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in message
> > news:wclark2-56C41F.21534213022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu...
> >> In article <MPG.25e0f00f67ae0047989bb6(a)news.giganews.com>, BAR
> >> <screw(a)you.com> wrote:
> >>> In article <wclark2-9805B4.14134813022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-
> >>> state.edu>, wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com says...
> >>> > In article <MPG.25e0b2f129e9b2f4989bb5(a)news.giganews.com>, BAR
> >>> > <screw(a)you.com> wrote:
> >>> > > In article <wclark2-3D25E9.12292413022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-
> >>> > > state.edu>, wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com says...
> >>> > > > In article <de2e5548-0783-4608-a88a-
> >>> > > > d906c877ba54(a)36g2000yqu.googlegroups.com>, Dinosaur_Sr
> >>> > > > <frostback2002(a)att.net> wrote:
> >>> > > > > On Feb 13, 11:05 am, Carbon <nob...(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com>
> >>> > > > > wrote:
> >>> > > > > > On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 07:18:11 -0600, Moderate wrote:
> >>> > > > > > > "Carbon" <nob...(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in
> >>> > > > > > > message
> >>> > > > > > >news:4b7497cf$0$5110$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com...
> >>> > > > > > >> On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 15:19:44 -0800, dene wrote:
> >>> > > > > > >>> <bkni...(a)conramp.net> wrote in message
> >>> > > > > > >>>news:heu8n5t5m6bopoc55sburstujj9897ii1t(a)4ax.com...
> >>> > > > > > >>>> On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 13:31:23 -0800 (PST), Dinosaur_Sr
> >>> > > > > > >>>> <frostback2...(a)att.net> wrote:
> >>> > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > >>>> You're kidding. Biden wasted Palin in debate, and
> >>> > > > > > >>>> he's a lightweight. She's a joke that is riding a
> >>> > > > > > >>>> wave of simple minds.
> >>> > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > >>> In your dreams. Palin did just fine with Blabben.
> >>> > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > >> She was drilled night and day going into the debate and
> >>> > > > > > >> managed to repeat a bunch of memorized sound bites,
> >>> > > > > > >> mostly without embarrassing herself. It's not like she
> >>> > > > > > >> did well.
> >>> > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > > Well I guess that qualifies her to be President. Obama
> >>> > > > > > > is nothing more than a talking head. He is the Commander
> >>> > > > > > > in Chief, yet he doesn't know what a Corpsman is.
> >>> > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > Watch the recent live unscripted debate between Obama and
> >>> > > > > > the GOP.
> >>> > > > >
> >>> > > > > Debate? A debate has a form, that was one person asking a
> >>> > > > > question, another replying and then moving on to some other
> >>> > > > > question. Hardly a debate. In that form there is no
> >>> > > > > viewpoint expressed other than that of the person answering
> >>> > > > > the questions. A joke maybe, but no debate.
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > Then how come SarahQuitter couldn't manage even a scripted Q&A
> >>> > > > without scrawling notes on her palm like some 3rd grader?
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Why not ask Barbara Boxer?
> >>> >
> >>> > Because I am asking you.
> >>>
> >>> Again, missing the point Billy. If writing on your hand is good
> >>> enough for Barbara Boxer it should be good enough for everyone?
> >>
> >> So you do agree about SarahQuitter, then? Good.
> >
> > Clark agrees that Barbara Boxer is a 3rd grader.
>
> You know the picture of her with writing on her hand is from like 1990,
> correct?

And he doesn't know the picture isn't of Barbara Boxer, either. Par for
the course.
From: William Clark on
In article
<c4b41158-aba5-4d06-9388-708c745cff9f(a)d27g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>,
Dinosaur_Sr <frostback2002(a)att.net> wrote:

> On Feb 13, 12:23�pm, William Clark <wcla...(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com>
> wrote:
> > In article
> > <b33ef4c0-206d-44a8-a5b2-84e3e97cc...(a)h2g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>,
> >
> >
> >
> > �Dinosaur_Sr <frostback2...(a)att.net> wrote:
> > > On Feb 13, 10:39�am, William Clark <wcla...(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > In article
> > > > <6ea6aa0b-dd0f-4933-bfd0-2b763861e...(a)b2g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>,
> >
> > > > �Dinosaur_Sr <frostback2...(a)att.net> wrote:
> > > > > On Feb 12, 2:01�pm, William Clark <cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-
> > > > > state.edu> wrote:
> > > > > > In article <7tljlbFg5...(a)mid.individual.net>,
> >
> > > > > > �"dene" <d...(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > "William Clark" <cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in
> > > > > > > message
> > > > > > >news:clark-13ED1E.09503912022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu...
> > > > > > > > In article <hl3k94$33...(a)speranza.aioe.org>,
> > > > > > > > �"Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > > > "dene" <d...(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote in message
> > > > > > > > >news:7tjvqjFuvU1(a)mid.individual.net...
> >
> > > > > > > > > > "William Clark" <wcla...(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in
> > > > > > > > > > message
> > > > > > > > > >news:wclark2-C14662.20553411022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-stat
> > > > > > > > > >e.ed
> > > > > > > > > >u...
> >
> > > > > > > > > >> Oh, bullshit, Jack. We've been over that again and again -
> > > > > > > > > >> he's as
> > > > > > > dumb
> > > > > > > > > >> as paint.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > Hmmm....what does that say about the intelligence of Gore,
> > > > > > > > > > Kerry, or
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > American electorate who elected this dummy.
> >
> > > > > > > > > I always enjoy watching idiots like Clark talk about other
> > > > > > > > > people's
> > > > > > > > > intelligence. �What a boob.
> >
> > > > > > > > Yu and Intelligence don;t belong in the same sentence. Go find
> > > > > > > > some.
> >
> > > > > > > I'm waiting for an intelligent answer to my question, Clark.
> >
> > > > > > > -Greg
> >
> > > > > > Well, Bush is the one they elected (supposedly), so it is a
> > > > > > frightening
> > > > > > indictment of the Americn electorate.
> >
> > > > > Hardly in the same league as electing any Labour Party candidate in
> > > > > any context!
> >
> > > > Get back on your meds - quickly.
> >
> > > So you agree with me that electing Labour party candidates is a
> > > frightening indictment of the British electorate.
> >
> > No, I agree that you need to start taking your medication again. You are
> > becoming delusionally schizophrenic.
>
> What qualifications do you presume to have to make such a diagnosis?

Observation. Simple observation.
From: William Clark on
In article <7tte2tFus6U1(a)mid.individual.net>,
"MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote:

> "William Clark" <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in message
> news:wclark2-B3D61E.12232213022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu...
> > In article
> > <b33ef4c0-206d-44a8-a5b2-84e3e97ccad8(a)h2g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>,
> > Dinosaur_Sr <frostback2002(a)att.net> wrote:
> >
> >> On Feb 13, 10:39 am, William Clark <wcla...(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> > In article
> >> > <6ea6aa0b-dd0f-4933-bfd0-2b763861e...(a)b2g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>,
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Dinosaur_Sr <frostback2...(a)att.net> wrote:
> >> > > On Feb 12, 2:01 pm, William Clark <cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-
> >> > > state.edu> wrote:
> >> > > > In article <7tljlbFg5...(a)mid.individual.net>,
> >> >
> >> > > > "dene" <d...(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote:
> >> > > > > "William Clark" <cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in
> >> > > > > message
> >> > > > >news:clark-13ED1E.09503912022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu...
> >> > > > > > In article <hl3k94$33...(a)speranza.aioe.org>,
> >> > > > > > "Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > > > > > "dene" <d...(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote in message
> >> > > > > > >news:7tjvqjFuvU1(a)mid.individual.net...
> >> >
> >> > > > > > > > "William Clark" <wcla...(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in
> >> > > > > > > > message
> >> > > > > > > >news:wclark2-C14662.20553411022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state
> >> > > > > > > >.ed
> >> > > > > > > >u...
> >> >
> >> > > > > > > >> Oh, bullshit, Jack. We've been over that again and again -
> >> > > > > > > >> he's as
> >> > > > > dumb
> >> > > > > > > >> as paint.
> >> >
> >> > > > > > > > Hmmm....what does that say about the intelligence of Gore,
> >> > > > > > > > Kerry, or
> >> > > > > the
> >> > > > > > > > American electorate who elected this dummy.
> >> >
> >> > > > > > > I always enjoy watching idiots like Clark talk about other
> >> > > > > > > people's
> >> > > > > > > intelligence. What a boob.
> >> >
> >> > > > > > Yu and Intelligence don;t belong in the same sentence. Go find
> >> > > > > > some.
> >> >
> >> > > > > I'm waiting for an intelligent answer to my question, Clark.
> >> >
> >> > > > > -Greg
> >> >
> >> > > > Well, Bush is the one they elected (supposedly), so it is a
> >> > > > frightening
> >> > > > indictment of the Americn electorate.
> >> >
> >> > > Hardly in the same league as electing any Labour Party candidate in
> >> > > any context!
> >> >
> >> > Get back on your meds - quickly.
> >>
> >> So you agree with me that electing Labour party candidates is a
> >> frightening indictment of the British electorate.
> >
> > No, I agree that you need to start taking your medication again. You are
> > becoming delusionally schizophrenic.
>
> Classic Clark denial.

Have you learnt the difference between Barbara Boxer and Diane Feinstein
yet?
From: Carbon on
On Mon, 15 Feb 2010 17:28:06 +0000, assimilate wrote:
> On 15-Feb-2010, Carbon <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
>
>>> Perhaps because his numbers didn't bounce due to it? IMO, people are
>>> starting to tire with O precisely because he is all talk, so his
>>> talk fails to move any longer.
>>
>> First he's so incoherent he can't get by without a teleprompter, and
>> now he's all talk. Which is it?
>
> I'm not sure where your incomprehension comes from. The two concepts
> are not mutually exclusive. He is all talk, IOW, he promises large and
> delivers nothing. This is exactly what "the rubes" that voted for him
> are finding out. He is alleged to be a great speaker when properly
> prepared and prompted. I have never thought so, because, to me, a
> great speaker has to have great content; Obama has never had content,
> but he says nothing better than anyone else I've ever heard.

Speaking of incomprehension, the subject was how well he was able to
speak without a teleprompter. The answer to that is: very well. That
someone from the far right disagrees with him really doesn't mean much.
From: William Clark on
In article
<e753220d-786f-46b0-a9e3-f0afab2c3318(a)u9g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>,
Dinosaur_Sr <frostback2002(a)att.net> wrote:

> On Feb 13, 12:26�pm, William Clark <wcla...(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com>
> wrote:
> > In article
> > <b8033c9b-c8e1-42a5-9512-80e740b82...(a)15g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>,
> >
> >
> >
> > �Dinosaur_Sr <frostback2...(a)att.net> wrote:
> > > On Feb 13, 10:43�am, William Clark <wcla...(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > In article <4b75eca0$0$5077$9a6e1...(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>,
> >
> > > > �Carbon <nob...(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
> > > > > On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 18:06:19 -0500, BAR wrote:
> > > > > > In article <clark-EDF568.17402212022...(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-
> > > > > > state.edu>, cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu says...
> > > > > >> In article <MPG.25df7e125badc04a989...(a)news.giganews.com>,
> > > > > >> �BAR <sc...(a)you.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > > >>> Literate and poor or ignorant and rich?
> >
> > > > > >> Well, you are ignorant, but I doubt you are rich.
> >
> > > > > > You'd be surprised how much this dumb ignorant idiot has.
> >
> > > > > You think money makes you a better person? Guess what, Paris Hilton
> > > > > agrees with you.
> >
> > > > And bragging about (supposedly) having money is a sign of no class. Like
> > > > pretending to have proof that your soul mate published in journals in a
> > > > field he doesn't know anything about.
> >
> > > Kinda like some fool claiming that he is an accomplished person
> > > because of the name of the school that gave him a degree. I, OTOH,
> > > have actually published in the area of materials science, and that
> > > fact for some reason bothers you...which can only mean you are envious!
> >
> > No, you have not. Fourth author in a chemistry proceedings of a
> > conference you didn't even go to is absolutely NOT a materials science
> > publication. Any more than mine in the IADR Proceedings makes me a
> > dentist. Poor effort on your part.
> >
> > You suffer from a serious inferiority complex, that means your life is
> > devoted to trying (unsuccessfully) to tear down anyone with even modest
> > achievements in life. How very sad.
>
> I see, so you found the ACS Symposium series presentation and
> publication! Nope, doesn't make me a chemist, nor a seamstress (-
> ster!) but silk is a material and the work done was in materials
> science. There is one other publication in a much more significant
> journal and another presentation at an international conference...I
> even have a picture of me with everyone at the conference!

And it sure doesn't make you even remotely anything to do with materials
science. Chemists are always claiming to be "materials scientists",
because there is more funding there than in their field. Silk is a
textile, and this was a chemistry proceedings and not peer reviewed in
the accepted way. Sorry - you lose. The other "publications" are equally
bogus.
>
> In any event, it remains interesting that you are so consumed by the
> fact that I have done a bit of work in the area of materials science!

Sorry, but you have not. I am more interested in the fact that you have
to lie about it, in order to try to run down another academic. Doesn;t
say a lot for your professional ethics, now does it?