Tom Tancredo
in [Golf]
|
From: William Clark on 15 Feb 2010 19:30 In article <7ttejaF22bU1(a)mid.individual.net>, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > "William Clark" <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in message > news:wclark2-FC3F01.10380213022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > > In article <MPG.25dfa9bb46dfe5e2989bab(a)news.giganews.com>, > > BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: > > > >> In article <clark-D77901.17405412022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio- > >> state.edu>, clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu says... > >> > > >> > In article > >> > <3cebfbd0-3631-4c3a-a13d-daa58a9cda12(a)q27g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>, > >> > Dinosaur_Sr <frostback2002(a)att.net> wrote: > >> > > >> > > On Feb 12, 11:12 am, assimil...(a)borg.org wrote: > >> > > > On 12-Feb-2010, William Clark > >> > > > <cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> > >> > > > wrote: > >> > > > > >> > > > > > >Oh, bullshit, Jack. We've been over that again and again - > >> > > > > > >he's as > >> > > > > > >dumb > >> > > > > >> > > > > > >as paint. > >> > > > > >> > > > > > I can't wait to see your Yale degree or your Harvard degree. > >> > > > > >> > > > > Actually, it's from Oxford. Game, set, and match. > >> > > > > >> > > > it is a piece of paper & will not substitute for wisdom or > >> > > > character. > >> > > > > >> > > > -- > >> > > > bill-o > >> > > > >> > > Oxford is no big deal anyways. 3 years to get a Ph.D. You go to a > >> > > lecture now and then and write some sort of paper at the end of the > >> > > year and if the good ole boys like it, you advance. Totally lame, and > >> > > outdated, at least in science. An Ohio State Ph.D. in science > >> > > prepares > >> > > you 1000X better than does Oxford. > >> > > >> > Now you are really showing yourself to be dumb. Grow up. > >> > >> How many years of formal schooling have you had from the time you > >> completed your secondary education? Being punked out as doctoral > >> candidate does count. > > > > What in the world are you talking about? By this apparent criterion, > > Palin's multi-year meanderings around six minor universities and > > community colleges would qualify her as educated - which she clearly is > > not. > > "that means your life is devoted to trying (unsuccessfully) to tear down > anyone with even > modest achievements in life. How very sad." No, the PalmPalin has no discernible achievements, so she does not even qualify.
From: William Clark on 15 Feb 2010 19:31 In article <4b79e03e$0$4847$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>, Carbon <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote: > On Mon, 15 Feb 2010 11:30:40 -0600, MNMikeW wrote: > > "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message > > news:4b75eb36$0$5121$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... > >> On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 07:36:08 -0600, MNMikeW wrote: > >>> "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message > >>> news:4b749767$0$5110$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... > >>>> On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 17:21:30 -0600, MNMikeW wrote: > >>>>> "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message > >>>>> news:4b748e2c$0$5095$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... > >>>>>> On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 12:51:42 -0600, MNMikeW wrote: > >>>>>>> <bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message > >>>>>>> news:eni8n5d2ni49tgp0j8pd0dc4p0jroki97j(a)4ax.com... > >>>>>>>> On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 12:58:12 -0500, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> In article <sof8n5drfaqjkerbbv1ubt2f5ts6ta5i8l(a)4ax.com>, > >>>>>>>>> bknight(a)conramp.net says... > >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 11:21:44 -0500, BAR <screw(a)you.com> > >>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> In article <nta8n5p2g17si7haj18qn7kif0vi0k4kre(a)4ax.com>, > >>>>>>>>>>> bknight(a)conramp.net says... > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 10:04:37 -0500, BAR <screw(a)you.com> > >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> The TelePrompter "BS" hasn't been wiped off the table. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Obama has a long way to go before he can claim to be > >>>>>>>>>>>>> weaned off of the TelePrompter. > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Cripes Bert. Didn't you see the whipping he gave the repub > >>>>>>>>>>>> congressmen, all off the cuff? > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> In your dreams only. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Enough so that the Senators don't want to be embarrassed too. > >>>>>>>>>> They won't subject themselves to such a drubbing. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> In your dreams only. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Bert! This has been widely publicized. He offered to meet > >>>>>>>> with them and they said no, not as a large group, just with a > >>>>>>>> few of the leaders. They obviously don't want a repeat of the > >>>>>>>> representatives' poor showing. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> And the only people saying it was a "drubbing" are left wing > >>>>>>> blogs. The meeting they want to have on the 25th is just as > >>>>>>> bogus. Obama has stated he has no plans on starting over on > >>>>>>> healthcare. So whatever proposals are presented by the Repubs, > >>>>>>> they will be rejected. The people want a "do-over" on this and > >>>>>>> so do most Repubs. Obama will not allow that so basically it > >>>>>>> comes down to nothing more than more Obama Kabuki theater. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Jesus. You guys say you've watched it. Are you all blind, or > >>>>>> what? > >>>>> > >>>>> We dont have blinders on like you. > >>>> > >>>> No, Mike. According to the ceaseless Fox News narrative, Obama is > >>>> helpless without a teleprompter. He debated the GOP for over an > >>>> hour, all of them lined up with prepared questions. Not only did he > >>>> not fall apart, he gave no ground whatsoever. In fact he did very > >>>> well. It's that simple. The entire narrative is ridiculous and > >>>> stupid. > >>> > >>> I said he did very well. He by no means "drubbed" anyone. > >> > >> I'm glad you conceded that much. Most of your fellow travelers are in > >> denial. As for how well he did, I'm 100% certain that the GOP will > >> never, ever invite Obama to another unscripted live television > >> debate. Read into that what you will. > > > > There is nothing Obama does that is unscripted. > > Really. So at the recent GOP debate he, what, somehow got hold of their > in advance? Mike, how likely do you think that would have been? In PalmPalin's case, guaranteed. And she still couldn't handle it without scribbling her "core values" on her palm.
From: BAR on 15 Feb 2010 19:31 In article <4b79dfb3$0$4851$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>, nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com says... > > On Mon, 15 Feb 2010 08:23:24 -0500, BAR wrote: > > In article <4b7893f6$0$5103$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>, > > nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com says... > > > >> You haven't commented on Obama's performance in the recent live > >> televised debate. Why is that? Could it be that you're so desperate > >> to believe Obama is helpless without a teleprompter that you block > >> out all evidence to the contrary? Perhaps your obvious bias is > >> influencing your predictions about Obama's favorability ratings. > > > > Ok, I'll play. It was not a debate. It was a ask a quesiton and > > receive an answer session. > > Correct. It was actually tougher than a debate. They were lined up with > carefully prepared question after carefully prepared question, and they > still got nowhere. I am quite certain that the GOP will never invite > Obama to a live, unscripted television debate of this type again. Here we go again. What is your definition of a debate? What Obama did was not debating. Obama was asked a question, Obama's response was whatever he wanted to talk about. The questioner did not get the oppourtunity to ask a follow-up question. Hell, even a press conference has more in commone with a debate than Obama not directly responding to the questions asked by the Republicans.
From: BAR on 15 Feb 2010 19:33 In article <4b79e07b$0$4847$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>, nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com says... > You know the picture of her with writing on her hand is from like 1990, > correct? Does that mean she has been stupid or senile for 20 years?
From: BAR on 15 Feb 2010 19:35
In article <wclark2-0A8EC3.19242415022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio- state.edu>, wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com says... > > Have you learnt the difference between Barbara Boxer and Diane Feinstein > yet? Both liberal idiots from California. |