Tom Tancredo
in [Golf]
|
From: Alan Baker on 8 Feb 2010 14:12 In article <clark-F7529F.08023708022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu>, William Clark <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote: > In article <alangbaker-EA28F9.19091307022010(a)news.shawcable.com>, > Alan Baker <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote: > > > In article > > <clark-D65648.22083507022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu>, > > William Clark <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote: > > > > > In article <tTHbn.75092$JE2.71270(a)newsfe09.iad>, assimilate(a)borg.org > > > wrote: > > > > > > > On 7-Feb-2010, William Clark <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > But if one guy with money will vote to evict ten poor people, we will > > > > > call that "democracy"? I don't think so. > > > > > > > > eviction is a result of not meeting one's contractual obligations and > > > > not > > > > of > > > > some vote taken. > > > > > > No, it can also be the result of someone buying out and tearing up a > > > valid contract of a fully paid up tenant. > > > > > > You need to get out more. > > > > Give a concrete example. > > Alan, grow up a little - you only have to read your local papers to see > incidents like this. You are starting to sound like Bertie. Come on William: Give a concrete example of how you can "buy out" a valid contract except with the other party to it... > > > > And then deal with the fact that you've assumed that those tenants will > > have no vote... > > No, I am assuming they are effectively disenfranchised because someone > has multiple votes and cancels them out and then has additional votes > that count. Sorry, but no. No one has discussed the scale at which additional votes would be alloted, so you don't know that one person's vote can "effectively disenfranchise" ten. -- Alan Baker Vancouver, British Columbia <http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg>
From: Moderate on 8 Feb 2010 14:47 "John B." <johnb505(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:ae8a32c0-f97f-4e25-ad48-467fb695fa32(a)o3g2000vbo.googlegroups.com... > In a speech to the Tea Party convention, Tancredo said Obama was a > "committed socialist ideologue," who was elected by people who can't > read or write. He said a civics literacy test should be a prerequisite > for voting. I'm just wondering what the Republicans here think about > this. Do you defend him? I don't defend him. He reminds me of how silly the Democrats sounded when they said the same thing after President Bush's reelection. Maybe he was using satire. I didn't hear the speech.
From: Moderate on 8 Feb 2010 14:52 "John B." <johnb505(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:06180c7e-0b9e-43ad-8e0b-dcbac3729fa8(a)m31g2000yqb.googlegroups.com... Tell us Mike -- what would have happened if Obama and Congress had not passed the stimulus? ******************************************************* Probably the same thing that did happen since most of the first stimulus has yet to be spent.
From: bknight on 8 Feb 2010 16:07 On Mon, 8 Feb 2010 13:04:26 -0600, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > ><bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message >news:7kn0n518v5f21gs2jo01qnst1gmi84n715(a)4ax.com... >> On Mon, 8 Feb 2010 12:36:20 -0600, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> >> wrote: >> >> >>>> All politicians have advisors, but no one "handles" Obama. >>>> >>>> BK >>> >>>Riiiiight. In that case no one handled Bush then either. >>> >> >> They didn't have to. Cheney made most decisions alone. >> >> BK > >Talk about urban legends. Guess who decied to try KSM in civilian court? >Wasent Obama. > > Not his call. BK
From: MNMikeW on 8 Feb 2010 16:15
<bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message news:f8v0n5di4q87fntitcl71vjghenh2tfqpb(a)4ax.com... > On Mon, 8 Feb 2010 13:04:26 -0600, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> > wrote: > >> >><bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message >>news:7kn0n518v5f21gs2jo01qnst1gmi84n715(a)4ax.com... >>> On Mon, 8 Feb 2010 12:36:20 -0600, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>>>> All politicians have advisors, but no one "handles" Obama. >>>>> >>>>> BK >>>> >>>>Riiiiight. In that case no one handled Bush then either. >>>> >>> >>> They didn't have to. Cheney made most decisions alone. >>> >>> BK >> >>Talk about urban legends. Guess who decied to try KSM in civilian court? >>Wasent Obama. >> >> > Not his call. > > BK You mean Holder made the decision alone? Gasp! |