Tom Tancredo
in [Golf]
|
From: Carbon on 8 Feb 2010 18:07 On Mon, 08 Feb 2010 07:16:59 +0000, assimilate wrote: > On 7-Feb-2010, Carbon <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote: > >> The fact remains that Bert's original charge--Democrats worked the >> hardest to disenfranchise Blacks--is completely dubious when the >> racists migrated en masse to the Republican party nearly half a century >> ago. > > If that's all you got than you got nothing. The racist card is an act of > desperation. It wasn't my claim. Your Bert was accusing the Democrats with working harder to disenfranchise Blacks than the Republicans did. It's a ridiculous claim in light of what has gone on for the last 40+ years.
From: MNMikeW on 8 Feb 2010 18:10 "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message news:4b709733$0$5102$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... > On Mon, 08 Feb 2010 10:57:50 -0600, MNMikeW wrote: >> <bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message >> news:0cd0n5d7b7js63sc8987hu8897sk565qiv(a)4ax.com... >>> On Mon, 8 Feb 2010 10:00:18 -0600, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: >> >>> Who do you think makes his decisions? Names. >> >> Nancy Pelosi >> Rahm "dead fish" Emanual >> Andy Stern and his SEIU thugs. >> >> just to name a few. > > You're delusional. And you're in complete denial. No shock there I guess.
From: MNMikeW on 8 Feb 2010 18:11 "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message news:4b70976e$0$5102$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... > On Mon, 08 Feb 2010 11:30:50 -0600, MNMikeW wrote: >> <bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message >> news:lch0n5tpvfqkk7nkjd7lv3m1jkcfa8io31(a)4ax.com... >>> On Mon, 8 Feb 2010 10:57:50 -0600, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Who do you think makes his decisions? Names. >>>> >>>>Nancy Pelosi Rahm "dead fish" Emanual Andy Stern and his SEIU thugs. >>>> >>>>just to name a few. >>>> >>> If you actually believe that you're nuts, but it makes for a typical >>> right-wing urban legend, akin to the birth certificate folderol. >>> >> And if you actually believe Obama dosent have "handlers" you are >> equally nuts. > > Trained seals have handlers. Obama has advisors. You mean Czars don't you? Handlers, advisors, Czars. Same thing.
From: Howard Brazee on 8 Feb 2010 18:27 On Mon, 8 Feb 2010 13:06:04 -0600, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: >Tell us Mike -- what would have happened if Obama and Congress had not >passed the stimulus? Or alternatively implemented the stimulus in a different direction - maybe valuing lots of jobs over Big Business? -- "In no part of the constitution is more wisdom to be found, than in the clause which confides the question of war or peace to the legislature, and not to the executive department." - James Madison
From: John B. on 8 Feb 2010 19:05
On Feb 8, 5:27 pm, BAR <sc...(a)you.com> wrote: > In article <c2f8726d-f6fa-4290-9377-dc1ea84e0491 > @a32g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>, johnb...(a)gmail.com says... > > > > > > > We'd be 787 billion richer and have a far smaller government.- Hide quoted > > > > text - > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > Far smaller? You're going to have a tough time proving that. Without > > > the stimulus, would we have unemployment below 10% today? Would GDP > > > have grown 2.2% in the third quarter of 2009 and 5.7% in the fourth? > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > More than likely yes.- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > You don't know that. Neither do the Tea Partiers and neither do I. If > > Obama hadn't done the things he did to rescue the economy and end the > > recesssion (which has ended) we could be in a severe depression now. > > Nobody on the right seems to want to consider that. > > John B, you support Bush completely and his rescue of the economy in the > form of TARP? Yes, I supported the TARP. |