From: bknight on 8 Feb 2010 23:28 On Tue, 9 Feb 2010 03:46:50 GMT, assimilate(a)borg.org wrote: > >On 8-Feb-2010, Carbon <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote: > >> > Jury is still out on Palin. >> >> In what respect, Bill? > >she is still active and could serve in public office again. If the GOP has any possibility of winning in '12 it sure won't be with her on the ticket. BK
From: dene on 9 Feb 2010 01:58 <bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message news:rgc1n592jgnmbeulflha9pqlhts06hlf75(a)4ax.com... > On Mon, 08 Feb 2010 19:36:06 -0500, Jack Hollis <xsleeper(a)aol.com> > wrote: > > >On 08 Feb 2010 22:58:59 GMT, Carbon <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> > >wrote: > > > >>On Mon, 08 Feb 2010 10:57:50 -0600, MNMikeW wrote: > >>> <bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message > >>> news:0cd0n5d7b7js63sc8987hu8897sk565qiv(a)4ax.com... > >>>> On Mon, 8 Feb 2010 10:00:18 -0600, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Who do you think makes his decisions? Names. > >>> > >>> Nancy Pelosi > >>> Rahm "dead fish" Emanual > >>> Andy Stern and his SEIU thugs. > >>> > >>> just to name a few. > >> > >>You're delusional. > > > >The legislative agenda is completely in the hands of Nancy and Harry. > >Obama isn't even in the loop. Obama will sign anything they send him. > >he doesn't even know what's in the legislation. > > > >Other than that, Obama does what Emanuel and his Union bosses tell him > >to do. > > You know this for sure, right? Just more ultra-right babbling. > > BK It has the same credibility as the lefties asserting that Cheney controlled Bush. Truth be told....nobody knows (yet) what goes beyond either of those closed doors. -Greg
From: dene on 9 Feb 2010 02:04 <assimilate(a)borg.org> wrote in message news:vL4cn.17558$5n.6066(a)newsfe23.iad... > > On 8-Feb-2010, "John B." <johnb505(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > Far smaller? You're going to have a tough time proving that. Without > > the stimulus, would we have unemployment below 10% today? Would GDP > > have grown 2.2% in the third quarter of 2009 and 5.7% in the fourth? > > The Federal Government has intervened in two and only two recessions: this > one and the Great Depression. See a pattern? Yeah....and it wasn't the "Deal" that ended the Great Depression. It was WW2. -Greg
From: dene on 9 Feb 2010 02:09 <bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message news:a2p1n551rk6l1347r88pr3qlrmrk7cbpsn(a)4ax.com... > On Tue, 9 Feb 2010 03:46:50 GMT, assimilate(a)borg.org wrote: > > > > >On 8-Feb-2010, Carbon <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote: > > > >> > Jury is still out on Palin. > >> > >> In what respect, Bill? > > > >she is still active and could serve in public office again. > > If the GOP has any possibility of winning in '12 it sure won't be with > her on the ticket. > > BK Agree....for now, but look how many dismissed Ronald Reagan as a B movie star. Somehow...he turned out ok. She could evolve into a serious contender but as it stands now, she has zippo chance of becoming our next President in 2012. -Greg
From: BAR on 9 Feb 2010 07:28
In article <5b21fb1c-d6da-4085-a6de-f4a2b21f8042 @o26g2000vbd.googlegroups.com>, johnb505(a)gmail.com says... > > On Feb 8, 5:27�pm, BAR <sc...(a)you.com> wrote: > > In article <c2f8726d-f6fa-4290-9377-dc1ea84e0491 > > @a32g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>, johnb...(a)gmail.com says... > > > > > > > > > > > We'd be 787 billion richer and have a far smaller government.- Hide quoted > > > > > text - > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > Far smaller? You're going to have a tough time proving that. Without > > > > the stimulus, would we have unemployment below 10% today? Would GDP > > > > have grown 2.2% in the third quarter of 2009 and 5.7% in the fourth? > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > More than likely yes.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > You don't know that. Neither do the Tea Partiers and neither do I. If > > > Obama hadn't done the things he did to rescue the economy and end the > > > recesssion (which has ended) we could be in a severe depression now. > > > Nobody on the right seems to want to consider that. > > > > John B, you support Bush completely and his rescue of the economy in the > > form of TARP? > > Yes, I supported the TARP. You supported Bush's economic recovery policies that Obama continued through Summers and Giethner? I just want to get it on the record that you supported the Bush economic policies. |