Tom Tancredo
in [Golf]
|
From: MNMikeW on 9 Feb 2010 17:44 "John B." <johnb505(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:0f1e0fe2-94a1-4c7a-ad10-3547471c68d6(a)a32g2000yqm.googlegroups.com... All govt. agencies that have money left over at the end of the fiscal year have to give it back to the Treasury. ==================== Yeah, that will happen, lol!
From: MNMikeW on 9 Feb 2010 17:50 "William Clark" <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in message news:wclark2-EE6CED.16071509022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > In article <hksb74$6jb$1(a)speranza.aioe.org>, > "Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> wrote: > >> "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote in message >> news:7tdouaFpc3U1(a)mid.individual.net... >> > >> > Obama wanted an across the board tax on the "cadillac health plans". >> > The >> > Unions told him, oh no you don't. >> >> Don't forget that the Unions also do the President's bidding. Let's not >> forget the SEIU thug violence at early tea party rallies. Once they got >> the >> bad press the goons were called off. You don't see any more SEIU thugs >> at >> tea parties. > > And actually you never did in the first place. Other than in your own > mind and a questionable staged video. Staged? The charges against 6 people envolved were also staged?
From: Carbon on 9 Feb 2010 18:27 On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 07:29:41 -0500, BAR wrote: > In article <4b7095db$0$31033$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>, > nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com says... >> On Mon, 08 Feb 2010 07:08:32 +0000, assimilate wrote: >>> On 7-Feb-2010, Carbon <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote: >>> >>>> I did a seminar course in literary theory. It was actually pretty >>>> interesting: Kant, Goethe, and yes, Marx, Saussure, Benjamin, >>>> Sarte, Frye, Heidegger, Derrida, Barthes, Foucault, Bloom, Achebe, >>>> Fish... >>> >>> Half the list after Marx is derivative of him >> >> Marx is an important historical figure. There is nothing wrong with >> ideas per se, even ideas which are unpopular. And I believe it's >> wrong to dismiss things out of hand without understanding what they >> are. > > Marxist economic and political theory when put into practical > application has failed and failed miserably. Marx is an important historical figure. There is nothing wrong with ideas per se, even ideas which are unpopular. And I believe it's wrong to dismiss things out of hand without understanding what they are.
From: Carbon on 9 Feb 2010 18:28 On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 12:44:09 -0600, MNMikeW wrote: > <bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message > news:rgc1n592jgnmbeulflha9pqlhts06hlf75(a)4ax.com... >> On Mon, 08 Feb 2010 19:36:06 -0500, Jack Hollis <xsleeper(a)aol.com> >> wrote: >>>On 08 Feb 2010 22:58:59 GMT, Carbon <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> >>>wrote: >>>>On Mon, 08 Feb 2010 10:57:50 -0600, MNMikeW wrote: >>>>> <bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message >>>>> news:0cd0n5d7b7js63sc8987hu8897sk565qiv(a)4ax.com... >>>>>> On Mon, 8 Feb 2010 10:00:18 -0600, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Who do you think makes his decisions? Names. >>>>> >>>>> Nancy Pelosi Rahm "dead fish" Emanual Andy Stern and his SEIU >>>>> thugs. >>>>> >>>>> just to name a few. >>>> >>>>You're delusional. >>> >>>The legislative agenda is completely in the hands of Nancy and Harry. >>>Obama isn't even in the loop. Obama will sign anything they send >>>him. he doesn't even know what's in the legislation. >>> >>>Other than that, Obama does what Emanuel and his Union bosses tell >>>him to do. >> >> You know this for sure, right? Just more ultra-right babbling. > > As compared to Carbs ultra-left babbling? Feel free to be specific.
From: Carbon on 9 Feb 2010 18:32
On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 07:37:23 -0500, BAR wrote: > In article <4b709928$0$5102$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>, > nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com says... >> On Mon, 08 Feb 2010 07:16:59 +0000, assimilate wrote: >>> On 7-Feb-2010, Carbon <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote: >>> >>>> The fact remains that Bert's original charge--Democrats worked the >>>> hardest to disenfranchise Blacks--is completely dubious when the >>>> racists migrated en masse to the Republican party nearly half a >>>> century ago. >>> >>> If that's all you got than you got nothing. The racist card is an >>> act of desperation. >> >> It wasn't my claim. Your Bert was accusing the Democrats with working >> harder to disenfranchise Blacks than the Republicans did. It's a >> ridiculous claim in light of what has gone on for the last 40+ years. > > Now I belong. I don't think Bill-O and the libertarians would want me. > > It wasn't a claim, it is a fact. > > When you are told to vote Democrat because we, the Democrats, will > take care of you. And, you realize that you are being used for the > election only and then once the election is over you are told to sit > down and shut up, what do you call that? Babbling Bertie strikes again. |