From: William Clark on 9 Feb 2010 21:32 In article <ds54n517jos4gubruo9hrabq9v08deanbh(a)4ax.com>, Jack Hollis <xsleeper(a)aol.com> wrote: > On 09 Feb 2010 23:27:03 GMT, Carbon <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> > wrote: > > >Marx is an important historical figure. There is nothing wrong with > >ideas per se, even ideas which are unpopular. And I believe it's wrong > >to dismiss things out of hand without understanding what they are. > > Do you feel the same way about Mein Kampf? Absolutely - "know thine enemies . . "
From: bknight on 9 Feb 2010 21:33 On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 21:20:00 -0500, Jack Hollis <xsleeper(a)aol.com> wrote: >On 09 Feb 2010 23:27:03 GMT, Carbon <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> >wrote: > >>Marx is an important historical figure. There is nothing wrong with >>ideas per se, even ideas which are unpopular. And I believe it's wrong >>to dismiss things out of hand without understanding what they are. > >Do you feel the same way about Mein Kampf? Are you drunk? The only thing that Marx had in common with Hitler was that he was German. He was a philosopher, historian, political theorist, and revolutionary. He had nothing to do with militarism. I don't care for his politics,but his manifesto is not at all comparable to Mein Kampf, a pseudo biography of Adolf, replete with anti Jewish propaganda. BK
From: Jack Hollis on 9 Feb 2010 21:39 On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 20:02:37 -0600, bknight(a)conramp.net wrote: >You know Jack, I might be willing to discuss this with Mike, or >Ketchum, or another conservative, but you, and a couple of others here >are so inane with the ultra-right messages that I won't waste my time. >Of all the posts that you've delivered here for instance the one about >Palin possibly being elected president renders you certifiable insane. > >BK Right now, the polls show that she's the leading contender for the Republican nomination. I'd gladly vote for her over Obama.
From: BAR on 9 Feb 2010 21:43 In article <db2a27f5-440d-4f27-bbd9-e395f15e5b36 @b10g2000vbh.googlegroups.com>, johnb505(a)gmail.com says... > > On Feb 9, 5:44�pm, "MNMikeW" <MNMiik...(a)aol.com> wrote: > > "John B." <johnb...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > > > news:0f1e0fe2-94a1-4c7a-ad10-3547471c68d6(a)a32g2000yqm.googlegroups.com... > > All govt. agencies that have money left over at the end of the > > fiscal year have to give it back to the Treasury. > > ==================== > > > > Yeah, that will happen, lol! > > It does happen. Furniture.
From: bknight on 9 Feb 2010 21:46
On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 21:39:17 -0500, Jack Hollis <xsleeper(a)aol.com> wrote: >On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 20:02:37 -0600, bknight(a)conramp.net wrote: > >>You know Jack, I might be willing to discuss this with Mike, or >>Ketchum, or another conservative, but you, and a couple of others here >>are so inane with the ultra-right messages that I won't waste my time. >>Of all the posts that you've delivered here for instance the one about >>Palin possibly being elected president renders you certifiable insane. >> >>BK > >Right now, the polls show that she's the leading contender for the >Republican nomination. I'd gladly vote for her over Obama. That figures. You have no common sense. BK |